Battery Life

One of the big draws of the larger form factor is battery life. Due to fundamental scaling issues, a bigger phone should be able to achieve greater battery life than a small one. This is because a smartphone's PCB generally remains constant in size, so it becomes an increasingly smaller proportion of the overall device size. This leaves increasingly large areas where batteries fill in the gap. In order to quantify just how big of a difference this makes when going from 4.7" to 5.5", we turn to our standardized battery life test suite. For those unfamiliar with our testing, the display is calibrated to 200 nits and all background tasks are disabled in order to ensure that only the foreground task is active in our tests.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

As we previously discussed, the iPhone 6 Plus performs quite admirably in the WiFi web browsing test. As expected, there's a healthy bump over the iPhone 6, but it's not quite a massive leap as a larger battery size might suggest.

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Once again, we see a similar pattern with the LTE web browsing test. Since both phones are based on the same platform, it makes sense that their results track quite closely together as we're only scaling display and battery size within the context of these tests.

However, the web browsing test is a mostly display-bound test, even if there is an SoC efficiency aspect that can make a significant difference. In order to better test SoC efficiency and get an idea of the dynamic range that a phone has in battery life, we turn to our compute-bound tests. Unfortunately, Basemark OS II stops the test too early due to low battery notifications in iOS, so we cannot use that test for a proper comparison to other phones.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

As shown in these charts, the iPhone 6 Plus manages to sustain a significant boost in battery life when compared to the iPhone 6, and performance is almost identical as well. It seems that the iPhone 6 Plus begins to throttle towards the end of the test simply because it has more time to generate heat rather than any real difference in cooling, as skin temperatures were also around 43C on the iPhone 6 Plus in this test. It's also important to note that the iPhone 6 Plus is rendering at 2208x1242 internally in order to keep proper scaling with the 163 points per inch system that iOS has, which accounts for part of the performance delta.

Overall, battery life on the iPhone 6 Plus ranges between about 20% higher to 40% higher depending on the balance of display power and SoC/baseband power in any given situation. Heavily display-bound situations will be closer to the 20% higher figure while more SoC-bound tasks will tend toward 40% or even higher. Purely idle situations should see even greater improvements as any situation where the display is off will see linear scaling with battery size.

Charge Time

Charge time is one of the key metrics for getting a holistic picture of battery life, as it's impossible to really understand whether a phone will be able to stay mobile as needed without considering recharging. In some cases such as a trade show or travel, it doesn't matter if a phone lasts 20% longer than the competition if it loses all the time gained in time spent on a charger. In order to test this, power is tracked from when the phone is connected to the charger to when it reaches the lowest power draw state on the AC adapter.

Charge Time

Unfortunately, the included charger is the same 5W charger that we've seen for years now. As a result, the iPhone 6 Plus is constrained by the relatively low maximum power that it can put out. Those that wish for faster charging should look into getting an iPad A/C adapter as the iPhone 6 Plus will charge faster when connected to it.

Introduction and "Bendgate" Display and Camera
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    well CR has stated that IP6+ bends under what? 60lb's of force applied at dead center of the phone. Which compares to roughly 100+ (130 seems to be the usual number) lbs of force required to bend or damage other devices.

    I agree CR isn't in apple's pocket. They just gently on apple's parade. Gentle like
  • trololololol - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    The HTC One M8 fared the worst.
  • Laxaa - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    The problem is that there seems to be a structural weakness near the volume buttons. That's what people are reporting and that's what CR should have tested.
  • douglaswilliams - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Two quotes:
    "It's also important to note that the iPhone 6 Plus is rendering at 2208x1242 internally in order to keep proper scaling with the 163 points per inch system that iOS has, which accounts for part of the performance delta."
    and
    "The use of the 2208x1242 resolution with downscaling..."

    Why would the iPhone 6 Plus render at such a high resolution?
    How much of performance hit is taken due to this extra unused rendering?

    There is also not much info on graphics performance in general. With the 6+ having 2.07x as many pixels as the 6, but the same GPU, I would expect it to take a huge graphics performance hit.
    Can you comment on this? Perhaps there is some data in the iPhone 6 review - I haven't read that yet.

    Thank you.
  • uhuznaa - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    The downscaling happens in specialized hardware right on the SoC (much like video decoding), shouldn't have much (if any) impact on performance.
  • solipsism - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Has he mentions, to keep proper scaling. The Retina devices scaled at 2x, this scales at 3x. 2208x1242 is a perfect 3x scaling, but that physical display (probably for multiple reasons) wasn't viable at this time for the device.
  • Applebot - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    A dumbed-down lazy review. I expect better from Anandtech.
  • solipsism - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    What exactly is dumbed down about it? Did you not see that the full review of the iPhone 6 series is in another article?
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Well just about everything really :)

    That's kinda the point. Its a review that you can usually find on engadget. With a conclusion to match. (I am talking about the wording not the content of the conclusion)
  • hlovatt - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    That is unfair comment; the combined 6 & 6+ reviews are the most detailed I have seen on the web, do you have 2 or 3 more detailed reviews to support your assertion?

    If not you should apologise for denigrating the hard work AnandTech put into all their testing.

    If AnandTech isn't supported there will be no in-depth reviews at all.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now