Battery Life

One of the big draws of the larger form factor is battery life. Due to fundamental scaling issues, a bigger phone should be able to achieve greater battery life than a small one. This is because a smartphone's PCB generally remains constant in size, so it becomes an increasingly smaller proportion of the overall device size. This leaves increasingly large areas where batteries fill in the gap. In order to quantify just how big of a difference this makes when going from 4.7" to 5.5", we turn to our standardized battery life test suite. For those unfamiliar with our testing, the display is calibrated to 200 nits and all background tasks are disabled in order to ensure that only the foreground task is active in our tests.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

As we previously discussed, the iPhone 6 Plus performs quite admirably in the WiFi web browsing test. As expected, there's a healthy bump over the iPhone 6, but it's not quite a massive leap as a larger battery size might suggest.

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Once again, we see a similar pattern with the LTE web browsing test. Since both phones are based on the same platform, it makes sense that their results track quite closely together as we're only scaling display and battery size within the context of these tests.

However, the web browsing test is a mostly display-bound test, even if there is an SoC efficiency aspect that can make a significant difference. In order to better test SoC efficiency and get an idea of the dynamic range that a phone has in battery life, we turn to our compute-bound tests. Unfortunately, Basemark OS II stops the test too early due to low battery notifications in iOS, so we cannot use that test for a proper comparison to other phones.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

As shown in these charts, the iPhone 6 Plus manages to sustain a significant boost in battery life when compared to the iPhone 6, and performance is almost identical as well. It seems that the iPhone 6 Plus begins to throttle towards the end of the test simply because it has more time to generate heat rather than any real difference in cooling, as skin temperatures were also around 43C on the iPhone 6 Plus in this test. It's also important to note that the iPhone 6 Plus is rendering at 2208x1242 internally in order to keep proper scaling with the 163 points per inch system that iOS has, which accounts for part of the performance delta.

Overall, battery life on the iPhone 6 Plus ranges between about 20% higher to 40% higher depending on the balance of display power and SoC/baseband power in any given situation. Heavily display-bound situations will be closer to the 20% higher figure while more SoC-bound tasks will tend toward 40% or even higher. Purely idle situations should see even greater improvements as any situation where the display is off will see linear scaling with battery size.

Charge Time

Charge time is one of the key metrics for getting a holistic picture of battery life, as it's impossible to really understand whether a phone will be able to stay mobile as needed without considering recharging. In some cases such as a trade show or travel, it doesn't matter if a phone lasts 20% longer than the competition if it loses all the time gained in time spent on a charger. In order to test this, power is tracked from when the phone is connected to the charger to when it reaches the lowest power draw state on the AC adapter.

Charge Time

Unfortunately, the included charger is the same 5W charger that we've seen for years now. As a result, the iPhone 6 Plus is constrained by the relatively low maximum power that it can put out. Those that wish for faster charging should look into getting an iPad A/C adapter as the iPhone 6 Plus will charge faster when connected to it.

Introduction and "Bendgate" Display and Camera
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • krazyfrog - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Oh, no. You used the 'P' word.
  • dxkj - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Would have liked to see the charge times with the 2.1Amp charger, I know it doesnt ship with it (for some reason?), but it seems like it would be worth benchmarking to show the capabilities when you are in a pinch.
  • douglaswilliams - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Agreed. Many households that will be purchasing a 6+ will also have an iPad. When coming home from work to grab dinner before heading out again, I often will use my iPad charger to get a quick half hour of charge on my phone.
  • solipsism - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    It would have been nice to know. I'm also curious about potential wear-and-tear on the battery and charger since Apple hasn't offered a 10W (or larger charger) in the device at this point.
  • meditazen - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    "...it doesn't matter if a phone lasts 20% longer than the competition if it loses all the time gained to time spent on a charger".

    Such common sense and amazing I didn't consider this before. Love how insightful the reviewers are here compared to everywhere else. Keep up the good work.
  • solipsism - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    It's a ridiculous comment without some oddball scenario where that time is somehow tied to directly waiting for it to charge, which isn't likely the case, especially now with a longer lasting battery.
  • SirKnobsworth - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Depends on when you charge your phone. If you charge it during the day then charge time matters, but I usually plug my phone in at night so overall battery life matters more.
  • coldpower27 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    As has been said, irrelevant if you plug in before you go to sleep. Now I will likely be able to get through the whole day without charging lol.
  • anactoraaron - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    Consumer reports - the best PR spin source since 1999.

    Where did they purchase their unit - or was it cherry picked by apple? Nowhere in the report is it listed where they got their sample, only that they have a sample that they tested. I know someone with a deformed 6+ that I can most assuredly tell you that they did not intentionally do so. Funny how consumer reports was so swift to counter claims about the bending issue... Something here stinks
  • solipsism - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    It's laughable that you think CR is in Apple's pocket. They are just capitalizing on this non-issue like the the the anti-Apple media.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now