The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Review: Featuring EVGA
by Ryan Smith on September 26, 2014 10:00 AM ESTTotal War: Rome 2
The second strategy game in our benchmark suite, Total War: Rome 2 is the latest game in the Total War franchise. Total War games have traditionally been a mix of CPU and GPU bottlenecks, so it takes a good system on both ends of the equation to do well here. In this case the game comes with a built-in benchmark that plays out over a forested area with a large number of units, definitely stressing the GPU in particular.
For this game in particular we’ve also gone and turned down the shadows to medium. Rome’s shadows are extremely CPU intensive (as opposed to GPU intensive), so this keeps us from CPU bottlenecking nearly as easily.
Yet again we have a situation where the winner and loser is effectively decided by the resolution in use. GTX 970 will trail at 4K, only to take a slight lead at 1440p. As we’ve stated before 1440p and 1080p are going to be the sweet spots for GTX 970 based on its $329 price tag, so for GTX 970 this means it’s winning or tying in the resolutions where it matters the most.
Of course if you factor in the FTW overclock then the point becomes moot. With the GTX 970 and R9 290XU tracking so close together, the higher clock speeds mean that a GTX 970 card can push ahead of R9 290XU on average.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
155 Comments
View All Comments
Laststop311 - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link
330 for this is a steal. Very few cases one even needs a 980. Even so I am still buying the 980 I keep my hpus for a long time, still using radeon 5870 nowThe-Fox - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link
Thanks Ryan ! great article, enjoyed reading it as much as I did the one on the GTX 980.GTX 970 proves to be an excellent card in terms of VFM, its a rare event in the high end GFX card market.
I would love to see GTX 970 in an SLI benchmark and see how it handles UHD (read 4K) games.
With its price point and performance it begs for a dual SLI setup.
Nfarce - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link
Guru3D has done it. It's highly impressive.Nfarce - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link
I've got two reference cooler EVGA 970s (superclocked) coming from NewEgg on Tuesday. I'm not a big overclocker on GPUs as I'm on air and want all possible heat blown out the back, but can't wait. Coming from a single 680 and having recently moved up to 1440p, and not having to upgrade my Corsair 750W gold PS, it's just an absolute zero brainer.Great review Ryan and thanks for continuing to show older games like Crysis Warhead and Grid 2 (which I use as a reference to compare with Grid Autosport benches)!
Scimitar11 - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link
Great article as usual. I just signed up to ask: Will you do any reviews/comparisons of the semi-reference cards with the cheaper blower style coolers for the 970? There are quite a few options out there (at least two non-ACX EVGA cards for example). I would love to know just how much difference there is in temps and noise, and possibly performance between the various cooler types.AndrewJacksonZA - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link
Ryan, are you using the horrendously bad stock AMD coolers for the 290X noise and temperature readings?kwrzesien - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link
Looks like NVIDIA did pretty awesome dealing with the surprise that they had to produce another generation on TSMC 28nm. Frankly these will probably be the best cards made for years to come since they really have 28nm figured out and Maxwell is bringing huge performance/watt. It will be interesting to see if they even make a 960 - would it be a further crippled GM204 or something else, maybe the first 20nm chip?So in classic AnandTech style it would be awesome to get an article on the inside story at NVIDIA about what they have gone through with Apple sucking up the first batch of 20nm at TSMC. I know they made some public noise about it - and think about it from the corporate perspective - they were used to getting first dibs on each die shrink and using that in the top-tier products. Now they are stuck a node behind, they may have to prioritize Tegra and mobile chips on 20nm first and leave desktop parts always a year behind. If that keeps workstation parts behind as well I can see why they would be pissed.
ppi - Monday, September 29, 2014 - link
When can we expect image quality tests?mr.techguru - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link
Why you did not mention EVGA has been caught with there chips being not aligned on the heat sink correctly..(Tho, they replied with it being how its suppose to be).Asus is always just a solid company to fall back on..
and gigabyte is generally the same way.
As for the 970's... MSI>Gigabyte>ASUS>EVGA.
EVGA's Problem: http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/evga-geforce-gtx-...
Everything you need to know about the MSI 970: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_geforce_g...
Gigaplex - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link
Neither of those links work