Metro: Last Light

As always, kicking off our look at performance is 4A Games’ latest entry in their Metro series of subterranean shooters, Metro: Last Light. The original Metro: 2033 was a graphically punishing game for its time and Metro: Last Light is in its own right too. On the other hand it scales well with resolution and quality settings, so it’s still playable on lower end hardware.

Metro: Last Light - 3840x2160 - High Quality

Metro: Last Light - 3840x2160 - Medium Quality

Metro: Last Light - 2560x1440 - High Quality

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality

As has become customary for us for the last couple of high-end video card reviews, we’re going to be running all of our 4K video card benchmarks at both high quality and at a lower quality level. In practice not even GTX 980 is going to be fast enough to comfortably play most of these games at 3840x2160 with everything cranked up – that is going to be multi-GPU territory – so for that reason we’re including a lower quality setting to showcase just what performance looks like at settings more realistic for a single GPU.

GTX 980 comes out swinging in our first set of benchmarks. If there was any doubt that it could surpass the likes of R9 290XU and GTX 780 Ti, then this first benchmark is a great place to set those doubts to rest. At all resolutions and quality settings it comes out on top, surpassing NVIDIA’s former consumer flagship by anywhere from a few percent to 12% at 4K with high quality settings. Otherwise against the R9 290XU it’s a consistent 13% lead at 2560 and 4K Medium.

In absolute terms this is enough performance to keep its average framerates well over 60fps at 2560, and even at 3840 Medium it comes just short of crossing the 60fps mark. High quality mode will take the wind out of GTX 980’s sails though, pushing framerates back into the borderline 30fps range.

Looking at NVIDIA’s last-generation parts for a moment, the performance gains over the lower tier GK110 based GTX 780 are around 25-35%. This is about where you’d expect to see a new GTX x80 card given NVIDIA’s quasi-regular 2 year performance upgrade cadence. And when extended out to a full 2 years, the performance advantage over GTX 680 is anywhere between 60% and 92% depending on the resolution we’re looking at. NVIDIA proclaims that GTX 980 will achieve 2x the performance per watt of GTX 680, and since GTX 980 is designed to operate at a lower TDP than GTX 680, as we can see it means performance over GTX 680 won’t quite be doubled in most cases.

The Test Company of Heroes 2
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • Stuka87 - Thursday, September 18, 2014 - link

    Why is it you guys are still using reference 290/290X cards for testing? Are they even being sold anymore?

    Oh, and I am having trouble believing nVidias claimed power consumption. It's certainly lower than a 780ti or 290x but not the 90W that is claimed according to the graphs.
  • arbit3r - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    looked at a few review sites, and its least 90watts some sites its a lot more but one that is closest is still about 90. AMD has been known to under state the true draw of their cards and even their CPU's. It tends to be higher then they say.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    We use reference cards whenever possible. And yes, the reference 290X is still being sold.

    That said, we include both normal and uber modes for this reason. Uber mode will be comparable to an open air (custom) 290X.
  • Stuka87 - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    Except when it comes to noise and heat, the open air cards are significantly better there. But I understand why you use reference cards.
  • bill5 - Thursday, September 18, 2014 - link

    Barely beating AMD's ancient R9 290X...doesn't look good for Nvidia's new generation considering AMD's new line is due soon at the high end. Yet they barely need it as their old line is close to competitive already!
  • arbit3r - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    it beats it using like 75-100+watts less power. On top of being overclocking monster where as AMD's card doesn't Overclock so much.
  • kron123456789 - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    I think the new top-end AMDs card will have TDP around 350-400W and have a cooler similar to 295X2 :)
  • jase240 - Thursday, September 18, 2014 - link

    Many of the pages are blank and show nothing for me, including the overclocking section.
  • Stuka87 - Thursday, September 18, 2014 - link

    If you read the first page, Ryan stated that things are still being uploaded.
  • SirMaster - Friday, September 19, 2014 - link

    Where are the Overclocking results?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now