Benchmark Configuration

All tests were done on Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS. We tested the HP Moonshot remotely. Our special thanks goes out to the team of HP EMEA Moonshot Discovery Lab of Grenoble (France). We tested both the Supermicro MicroCloud and the different motherboard configurations in our lab.

ASRock's C2750D4I

CPU Intel Atom C2750
RAM 4x 8GB DDR3 @1600 or
4x 16GB DDR3 @1333 (Intelligent Memory)
Internal Disks 1x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard ASRock C2750D4I
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

Intel's Xeon E3-1200 v3 – ASUS P9D-MH

CPU Intel Xeon processor E3-1240 v3
Intel Xeon processor E3-1230L v3
RAM 4x 8GB DDR3 @1600
Internal Disks 1x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard ASUS P9D-MH
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

Intel's Xeon E3-1200 v2

CPU Intel Xeon processor E3-1220 v2
Intel Xeon processor E3-1265L v2
RAM 4x 8GB DDR3 @1600
Internal Disks 1x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard Intel S1200BTL
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

Supermicro's MicroCloud SYS-5038ML-H8TRF

We enabled four nodes, each with an Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3. Each node was configured with:

CPU Intel Xeon processor E3-1230L v3
RAM 4x 8GB DDR3 @1600
Internal Disks 1x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard Super X10SLD-F
PSU Dual Supermicro PWS-1K62P-1R (1.6 KW, 80+ Platinum) for 4 nodes

We first tested with only one PSU, but that did not work out as the firmware kept all Xeons at their minimum clock speed of 800 MHz. Only with both PSUs active were the Xeon able to use all their p-states. Supermicro confirmed that four active nodes should be enough to make the PSU run efficiently.

HP Moonshot

We tested two different cartridges: the m400 and the m300. Below you can find the specs of the m400:

CPU/SoC AppliedMicro X-Gene 2.4
RAM 8x 8GB DDR3 @ 1600
Internal Disks m2 2280 Solid State 120GB
Cartridge m400

And the m300:

CPU/SoC Atom C2750 2.4
RAM 8x 8GB DDR3 @ 1600
Internal Disks m2 2280 Solid State 120GB
Cartridge m300

Other Notes

Both servers are fed by a standard European 230V (16 Amps max.) power line. The room temperature is monitored and kept at 23°C by our Airwell CRACs. We use the Racktivity ES1008 Energy Switch PDU to measure power consumption in our lab. We used the HP Moonshot ILO to measure the power consumption of the cartridges.

Quick Overview of the SoCs Bandwidth
Comments Locked

47 Comments

View All Comments

  • gdansk - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    xgene is not looking so great. Even if it is 50% more efficient as they promise they'll still be behind Atom.
  • Samus - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    HP Moonshot chassis are still *drool*
  • Krysto - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    The main problem with the non-Intel systems is not only that they use older processes compared to Intel, but that they use older processes even compared to the rest of the non-Intel chip industry. AMD is typically always behind 1 process node among non-Intel chip makers. If they'd at least use the cutting edge processes as they become available from non-Intel processes, maybe they'd stand a chance, especially now that the gap in process technologies is shrinking.
  • Samus - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    AMD simply isn't as bad as people continually make them out to be. Yes, they're "behind" Intel but it's all in the approach. We are talking about two engineering houses that share nothing in common but a cross licensing agreement. AMD has very competitive CPU's to Intel's i5's for nearly half the price, but yes, they use more power (at times 1/3 more.)

    But facts are facts: AMD is the second high-tech CPU manufacture in the world. Not Qualcomm, not Samsung. It's pretty obvious AMD engineering talent spreads more diversity than anyone other than Intel, and potentially superior to Intel on GPU design (although this has obviously been shifting over the years as Intel hires more "GPU talent.")

    AMD in servers is a hard pill to swallow though. If purchasing based on price alone, it can be a compelling alternative, but for rack space or low-energy computing?
  • Taneli - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    AMD doesn't even make it in top 10 semiconductor companies in sales. Qualcomm is three, Samsung semicondutors six and Intel almost ten times the size of AMD.

    Outside of the gaming consoles they are being completely overrun by competition.
  • owan - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    I'm sorry, at one point I was an AMD fanboy, back when they actually deserved it based on their products, but you just sound like an apologist. Facts are the facts, FX processors aren't competitive with i5's in performance or power or performance/$ because they get smacked so hard they can't be cheap enough to make up for it. Their CPU designs are woefully out of date, their APU's are bandwidth starved and use way too much power to be useful in the one place they'd be great (mobile), and their lagging process tech means theres not much better coming on the horizon. I don't want to see them go, but at the rate ARM is eating up general computing share, it won't be long before AMD becomes completely irrelevant. It will be Intel vs. ARM and AMD will be an afterthought.
  • xenol - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    Qualcomm is used in pretty much used in most cell phones in the US to the point you'd think Qualcomm is the only SoC manufacturer. I'm pretty sure that's also how it looks in most of the other markets as Korea. Plus even if their SoCs aren't being used, they're modems are heavily used.

    If anything, Qualcomm is bigger than AMD. Or rather, Qualcomm is the Intel of the SoC market.
  • xenol - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    [Response to myself since I can't edit]
    Qualcomm's next major competitor is Apple. But that's about it.

    Also I meant to say other markets except Korea.
  • CajunArson - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    Bear in mind that the Atom parts were commercially available in 2013, so they are by no means brand-new technology and the 14nm Atom upgrades will definitely help power efficiency even if raw performance doesn't jump a whole lot.

    Anandtech is also a bit behind the curve because Intel is about to release Xeon-D (8 Broadwell cores and integrated I/O in a 45 watt TDP, or lower), which is designed for exactly this type of workload and is going to massively improve performance in the low-power envelope sphere:

    http://techreport.com/review/27928/intel-xeon-d-br...
  • SarahKerrigan - Monday, March 9, 2015 - link

    14nm server Atom isn't coming.

    http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1325955

    "Atom will become a consumer only SoC."

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now