Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

Some of the miscellaneous aspects of interest in the WD My Book Duo include RAID rebuild and power consumption. The LEDs in front begin to flash red when the volume enters a degraded state (and also during the rebuild process). The WD Drive Utilities provides insights into the health of the array. We simulated drive loss by pulling out one of the disks during data transfer (the array was obviously configured in RAID 1). The hardware LED status immediately began flashing red. The monitoring program also reflected the degradation, but, only after the drive had been dismounted and remounted. Inserting the removed disk into a PC's SATA slot didn't show the stored data (as expected, since this is hardware RAID). The gallery below provides more insight into our RAID rebuild evaluation.

The unit does not support hot-swapping drives (unlike the 2big Thunderbolt 2). After dismounting, a new WD Red drive of the same capacity was inserted. At this juncture, WD provides us two ways to rebuild RAID - either by pressing the reset button on the back of the unit, or, via the WD Drive Utilities software interface. We took the latter approach, as evidenced in the above gallery.

Coming to the business end of the review, the WD My Book Duo is a very attractive solution for users looking to get high speed access to large amounts of data. Advertised speeds are reached for certain types of workloads. USB 3.0 support is now almost universal, and eSATA is losing favour in the mass market. Therefore, the choice of a USB 3.0-only interface for this RAID-enabled DAS solution looks perfect. The inclusion of a two additional USB 3.0 ports in a hub configuration enhances the versatility of the unit. It makes sure that average users (who are not focused on getting maximum bandwidth to their peripherals all the time) don't need to 'sacrifice' a USB 3.0 port in their systems. There is also a comprehensive software suite to take advantage of the high-speed DAS.

There are really no negatives to talk about with respect to the My Book Duo. While earlier DAS units from Western Digital allowed only certain drives to be used for RAID rebuilds (by including a firmware check before allowing the rebuild), the My Book Duo has no such problems. Western Digital confirmed that the Red and Green drives are certified for rebuilds, but there are no restrictions in place regarding usage of any other SATA drive model of the appropriate capacity. Potential areas of improvement, however, include support for hot-swapping drives and provision for data recovery from a RAID 1-member drive directly connected to a PC.

Performance Evaluation
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • BillT2014 - Monday, July 14, 2014 - link

    I've never before heard that a raid1 component drive might not be universally readable. All the controller is supposed to do is make the two drives identical. A single component of the RAID should be readable by any other system that supports that filesystem.
  • jamyryals - Monday, July 14, 2014 - link

    Would this, or something similar from another manufacturer, work connection to a USB 2.0 port? I would like to use this connected to an older machine, but I don't really want to add a USB 3.0 adapter card. If the device slowed to USB 2.0 speeds that would be fine.
  • celestialgrave - Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - link

    How hot did the drives get? Did the fan ever have to spin up to full speed? How would you characterize the fan noise?
  • BillT2014 - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    Still waiting for an explanation of this sentence:

    " Inserting the removed disk into a PC's SATA slot didn't show the stored data (as expected, since this is hardware RAID)."

    This defies all sense. RAID is RAID whether it is software or hardware. Maybe the reason the drive wasn't readable is because it was a RAID 0 component? That would never be readable as such under any circumstances. But a RAID 1 drive should always be readable.

    Well?
  • BillT2014 - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link

    The final sentence also defies everything we know about RAID:

    "Potential areas of improvement, however, include support for hot-swapping drives and provision for data recovery from a RAID 1-member drive directly connected to a PC."

    The reviewer ought to know that if a RAID 1-member drive, directly connected to a PC, is not recoverable, then the problem is the reviewer, not the drive.

    One might wonder if the reviewer was unwittingly testing a RAID 0 member?

    These issues should be addressed and the review should be corrected. It's amazing that it has stood so long like this.
  • yeub - Sunday, March 29, 2020 - link

    thanks for much for the post
    https://aboutdogfence.com/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now