Tablet Performance

The tablet performance comparison is as ridiculous as it's ever been. Surface Pro 3 is substantially faster than any ARM based tablet on the market. Web pages load quicker and you can play a completely different caliber of game on the device.

SunSpider 1.0.2 Benchmark  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Tablet GPU Performance

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

All news isn't good though on the tablet front. Surface Pro 3 still struggles to behave completely like a tablet, despite finally gaining support for Connected Standby. Waking up the device from sleep still requires around 1300ms, a period that sounds small but feels like an eternity compared to an Android or iOS tablet.

WiFi

Marvell remains Microsoft's partner of choice when it comes to the WiFi implementation on Surface Pro 3. The updated design features a Marvell Avastar 88W8897 SoC supporting 2-stream 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0. The SoC also features NFC support but it's not leveraged in Surface Pro 3.

WiFi performance is better than on Surface Pro 2. Peak performance improves from around 160Mbps to 260Mbps when connected at an 866Mbps link rate. I didn't notice any weird behavior or poor performance when connecting to WiFi networks, although as 2-stream 802.11ac implementations go this is hardly the fastest.

WiFi Performance - UDP

Laptop Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • jeffkibuule - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    30% lower power consumption, 30-40% increase in GPU performance.
  • Morawka - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    It will have either or, not both. It will either use 30% less power at the same performance (GPU included) or use the same power with a 30% increase in performance. You cant have both unless there is a new architecture, and broadwell is simply a haswell shrink.

    Sure they can take the power savings and add more GPU EU's but that's gonna negate the power savings.
  • Laxaa - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    Skylake is after Broadwell, right? Maybe wait for that one?

    I am lookin into buying a new laptop next year, and as a graphic designer, the Surface Pro 3 looks appealing because of the pen. CPU performance seems fine for my needs, but I want lower power consumption and a better GPU(If I had to choose I'd take a better GPU) The size looks fine, and I'm not sure if I'd like it to be tinner. 9.1 mm is still pretty thin.
  • mkozakewich - Monday, June 30, 2014 - link

    I've found that putting everything on low-power mode is still usable, but gives me an extra hour or two of battery life (on the original Surface Pro, even). Everything should be fluid enough for you with the latest one.
    Just make sure that issue with the edges of the screen is gone, with the move to NTrig.
  • Krysto - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    Not the best laptop, not the best tablet. I think that pretty much sums up Surface in general. It's an all-compromise device.
  • eddman - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    You lug your laptop AND tablet around while those who are tired of it or don't have the means to do so, take an SP3.

    Is it really that hard to see what and who a surface pro is meant for?
  • name99 - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    This argument only works if you're frequently in the position of having to carry both.
    A far more common situation is, for example, you take your laptop to school/work and use it to do laptoppy things well, an you use your table at home to do tabletty things well.

    Sure if you are, for example, a journalist or traveling salesman you may be in the position of wanting to carry tablet and laptop functionality with you, and S Pro may make sense. But I think the journalist point of view (for obvious reasons) gets rather more attention on the internet than is warranted by the relevant fraction of people with these sorts of requirements.
  • PaulC543 - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    No, the argument doesn't -only- work as you outlined, there's any number of reasons one might prefer a single device.

    I don't travel much, but when I do, I need a system capable of making revisions to work if need be. I have no need for the amount of text entry that would make a traditional laptop more attractive, so a tablet that could run my desktop programs was ideal. I can use it around the house for tabletty things, dock it and use it for real work, and take it when traveling to do both tabletty and work tasks.

    People really need to accept that there are other use scenarios than their own. It really seems to be a mental block for the people who don't get the value of the Surface. I'm not saying the audience who do get the Surface is huge, it's clearly not, but it seems to be big enough to support Microsoft's continued development of the device, and that's all that really matters.

    I don't comment on and criticize server products, because I have neither the knowledge, need or interest in the hardware that serves the market. I really wish people who don't have the knowledge, need or interest in the market the Surface serves would kindly refrain from criticizing since it's almost entirely baseless and/or misplaced.
  • gken8 - Tuesday, July 1, 2014 - link

    let me shed light on this, the legal profession loves this tablet.
  • ymcpa - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    There is also the position where you might carry only one device but frequently find that you wish you had another device with you. For example, you might be using a laptop for work but when you go on a break, you wish you had a tablet with you to do some browsing or to watch a video. Or you are on vacation with your tablet but you get a call from work asking for some info and you wish you had your laptop with you.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now