Battery Life

Microsoft made no sacrifice in battery capacity in pursuit of Surface Pro 3's thin chassis design. The new tablet features an integrated 42Wh battery just like the previous two models. Charging duties are handled by an external 31W charger with a brand new magnetic connector. Microsoft never seemed to get a good MagSafe clone working in the previous models, so Surface Pro 3 abandons the previous design entirely in favor of something a bit more sensible.

The new connector no longer looks like an oversized MagSafe connector, and instead features a thin plastic insert that mates with the charge port on Surface Pro 3. Charge time hasn't changed, you can fully charge the device in around 2.62 hours:

Charge Time

The device-side connector features 40 pins but you only need 12 of them to charge the device. The remaining pins are used for Gigabit Ethernet, USB, DisplayPort (up to 4096 x 2304) and audio. Microsoft seems hell bent on avoiding Thunderbolt at all costs so instead of embracing the standard it has created a custom alternative of its own doing. The benefit to Microsoft's connector is it can obviously deliver more power than Thunderbolt can, the downside is that it can't send PCIe and thus you don't get support for any ultra high bandwidth external storage devices. I still would rather see Microsoft implement Thunderbolt as there's at least an existing ecosystem built around that but here we are three generations into Surface and if we haven't seen it by now I don't think we're ever going to.

The supplied power adapter includes a USB charge port capable of delivering 1A at 5V.

As Surface Pro 3 is designed to be both a laptop and a tablet I've run it through both our Windows laptop battery life tests and our tablet battery life tests.

Laptop Battery Life

As a laptop, Surface Pro 3 delivers comparable battery life to other optimized Haswell ULT designs. I threw in Sony's Vaio Pro 13 into the mix because it has a similar sized battery (37Wh vs. 42Wh) and is one of the most power efficient Windows Ultrabook platforms on the market. Surface Pro 3 manages to deliver similar battery life, which means it's a little less power efficient but the two are within the same range at least.

Compared to Surface Pro 1 and 2, Surface Pro 3 at worst delivers similar battery life and at best increases range on a single charge by up to 20%. We're looking at 3.75 hours - 7.6 hours of notebook usage on a single charge depending on usage.

It's worth noting that there's a substantial advantage in battery life if we look at the 13-inch MacBook Air running OS X. I only mention this because of Microsoft's insistence on comparing Surface Pro 3 to Apple's popular line of notebooks.

Battery Life 2013 - Light

Battery Life 2013 - Medium

Battery Life 2013 - Heavy

Tablet Battery Life

Tablet workloads are going to be far more display power bound than anything else. Here we see 7.58 - 8.03 hours of continuous usage, a slight regression compared to Surface Pro 2. Video playback remains more power hungry than web browsing, which is something I've noted in previous tablet-evaluations of Intel's Core silicon. I don't believe Intel's Core processors are very optimized for video decode power consumption. If anything is going to change with the move to Broadwell and Core M I suspect video decode power may be it.

Video Playback Battery Life (720p, 4Mbps HP H.264)

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Thickness, Thermals and Core: Understanding how Surface Pro 3 Got so Thin Display Analysis
Comments Locked

274 Comments

View All Comments

  • KaarlisK - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    My one niggle is a lack of build-to-order options.
    An i3 is enough for me, and a 128GB may be enough for me, but I want 8GB RAM.
  • joaoasousa - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    Yep, there's a missing 128 GB / 8 GB combination that would be a sweetspot for a lot of people. I hope MS listens to the feedback and opens up more combinations.
  • DanNeely - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    No need to open more combinations; just replace the current 4/128 model with an 8/128. Nothing other than a bottom tier windows computer should only have 4gb of ram any longer.
  • tacitust - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    4GB of RAM is nowhere near the same problem for most users when it's paired with an SSD (instead of an HDD).

    I have an old laptop with 3GB of memory. It was painful to use, because the swap file was so slow and I had to wait several seconds when switching between apps. I was considering upgrading to 4GB and perhaps even 8GB until I dropped in an SSD. Now there is no need, it's already so much faster.

    For power users or gamers using memory hungry applications perhaps 8GB would be a good idea, but for the vast majority of users who use a typical mobile workload, paying for the extra 4GB is very likely a waste of money.
  • andrewaggb - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    Personally I'd rather have 4gb of ram and a 256gb ssd than 8gb of ram and a 128gb ssd.

    or both... if it didn't drive the price up to $1350 without a cover...
  • joaoasousa - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    The analysis I saw on the web say that with SSD the 8 GB are only required for gaming (which you can't do anyway) and running VMs. The price jump from 4 GB/128 to 8 / 256 is too much, I'll probably go for the 4/128 one.
  • ccd1 - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    My biggest reservations at this point is the future. Skylake is likely to be here in 12-15 months. Also, MS has shown a willingness to continually innovate in this space. I anticipate another leap in sophistication for the Pro at that time.
  • skiboysteve - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    We have said that every iteration. This one looks significant, so if you're in the market... It's a good time to buy
  • ccd1 - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    But if I wait for Skylake, it might be 18-24 months before it is a dinosaur instead of 12! lol!
  • stanwood - Monday, June 23, 2014 - link

    This used to be how people felt about Apple products. Big win for MS that they were not scared to put out a pretty good Surface Pro and then iterate quickly.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now