F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

F1 2013, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Bioshock Infinite, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Tomb Raider, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates
Scientific and Synthetic Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks: Sleeping Dogs, Company of Heroes 2 and Battlefield 4
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • frewster - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    The power delivery components are around the CPU socket. That heatsink is for the southbridge.
  • trowe37 - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    Not sure if I am correct but on the first page of the article it lists "1 x USB 3.0 Header
    2 x USB 3.0 Headers", however looking at the motherboard shouldn't it be "2 x USB 2.0 Headers"?
  • popej - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    Isn't ALC887 7.1 channel chip?
  • loimlo - Saturday, April 12, 2014 - link

    Thanks Ian. It's refreshing to see budget MB reviews. Hope to see more H81/B85, A85/A88 boards' reviews. It's the boards that people purchase/use most, but get reviewed least.
  • Questor - Saturday, April 12, 2014 - link

    I would like to see these smaller form factor boards with more PCI-express 4x type slots, rather than the PCI slot. This MSI board is perfect in every way for an upcoming build, except for the PCI slot. It's the deal breaker.
    Good review, thanks for your hard work.
  • joe15 - Wednesday, July 2, 2014 - link

    Do you know if it works fine with Ubuntu?
  • lateuser - Monday, September 18, 2017 - link

    I know I am late, but may I know what is the ideal temperature for this board? Mine averages 113 centigrade, and it appears as read in speccy, which gets me worried.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now