Something like the ASRock M8 can be difficult to benchmark.  Ultimately what benchmark results we get will essentially be dependent on the hardware a user adds in, and what we have placed in the build will be different to what any other user will do.  Also, there is almost no cross correlation from previous reviews for heat/noise, as Dustin was our case reviewer and I have no other starting point.  Nonetheless, I have repeated the majority of my usual benchmarks in the system, as well as tried to copy Dustin’s benchmark routine for comparison points.  Our test setup is as follows:

Test Setup

ASRock M8 Barebones Build
  Component Price
Chassis ASRock M8 $550
CPU Intel i7-4765T 4C/8T 35W 2.0 GHz (3.0 GHz Turbo) $400
Motherboard ASRock Z87-M8  
Memory G.Skill SO-DIMM DDR3-1866 C9 1.35V 2x8 GB Kit $160
GPU MSI HD7950 Twin Frozr II $320
Power Supply ASRock M8 450W Bronze made by FSP  
SSD OCZ Vertex 3 480GB $485
Storage Toshiba 750GB 2.5" HDD $67
ODD ASRock M8  

Total   $1982

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our test bed:

Thank you to ASRock for providing the M8 review sample.
Thank you to Intel for providing the i7-4765T CPU used in this review.
Thank you to G.Skill for providing the Ripjaws SO-DIMM 1866 C9 memory kit for this review.

A note on the G.Skill memory kit – up until the opportunity to review the ASRock M8, I was under the impression that SO-DIMM memory kits, for the most part, were set at DDR3-1600 CAS 9 at the high end.  Around the same time, G.Skill launched their Ripjaws SO-DIMM memory range, featuring 8GB modules at speeds higher than 1600 C9.  These were at 1866 C10 (Performance Index rise from 178 to 187), and the two 2x8 GB modules are currently on sale for $160.

Power Consumption

Power Consumption
Long Idle 55 W
Idle 44 W
OCCT 83 W
Metro 242 W

Despite using a 200W TDP graphics card and a 35W TDP CPU, the total system draw under Metro is 242W – more than adequate for the 450W bronze power supply used.  The limiting factor it would seem is temperatures, at which point the system would not be able to exhaust enough heat.

Temperatures

Temperatures
  CPU GPU
Idle 35 ºC 35 ºC
OCCT CPU Load 60 ºC 36 ºC
Furmark 42 ºC 76 ºC

While under load, it was clear when the GPU was being stressed from the top of the case – it became warm to touch, almost uncomfortable if held for a long time.  Although I would be satisfied with these temperatures in the long term – no game stresses the system as much as Furmark.

Windows 7 POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized.  A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized).  As part of our testing, we are now going to look at the POST Boot Time - this is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 7 starts loading.  (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)  These results are subject to human error, so please allow +/- 1 second in these results.

POST (Power-On Self-Test) Time

At 13 seconds the M8 is not a slouch, but not the speediest boot up sequence we have had for Z87.  There's still some margin to go for a sub 10-second POST.

Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5

In part due to reader requests, we are pleased to include Rightmark Audio Analyzer results in our benchmark suite.  The premise behind Rightmark:AA is to test the input and output of the audio system to determine noise levels, range, harmonic distortion, stereo crosstalk and so forth.  Rightmark:AA should indicate how well the sound system is built and isolated from electrical interference (either internally or externally).  For this test we connect the Line Out to the Line In using a short six inch 3.5mm to 3.5mm high-quality jack, turn the OS speaker volume to 100%, and run the Rightmark default test suite at 192 kHz, 24-bit.  The OS is tuned to 192 kHz/24-bit input and output, and the Line-In volume is adjusted until we have the best RMAA value in the mini-pretest.  We look specifically at the Dynamic Range of the audio codec used on board, as well as the Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise.

Rightmark: AA, Dynamic Range, 24-bit / 192 kHzRightmark: AA, THD+N, 24-bit / 192 kHz

Despite using a Creative audio codec on the motherboard, the final results are bottom of our small pile - dynamic range seems alright enough, but THD+N needs a rethink.

USB Backup

For this benchmark, we run CrystalDiskMark to determine the ideal sequential read and write speeds for the USB port using our 240 GB OCZ Vertex3 SSD with a SATA 6 Gbps to USB 3.0 converter.  Then we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer.  The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are the videos used in the WinRAR test.  In an update to pre-Z87 testing, we also run MaxCPU to load up one of the threads during the test which improves general performance up to 15% by causing all the internal pathways to run at full speed.

USB 2.0 Copy Times

USB 3.0 Copy Times

If anything our USB transfer speeds are pretty much in the gutter - USB 2.0 had issues in peak throughput, leading to the worst XFast timing we have seen, and basic USB 3.0 performance is likewise pretty poor.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing.  In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority.  Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests, such as audio, will be further down the line.  So if the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.  If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time, resulting in an empty audio buffer – this leads to characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks.  Having a bigger buffer and correctly implemented system drivers obviously helps in this regard.  The DPC latency checker measures how much time is processing DPCs from driver invocation – the lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes.  Results are measured in microseconds and taken as the peak latency while cycling through a series of short HD videos - under 500 microseconds usually gets the green light, but the lower the better.

DPC Latency Maximum

ASRock does really well in our DPC Latency test, being the best Z87 motherboard we have tested so far.  It magically comes under the 145-150 microsecond barrier we had been seeing up until this point.

ASRock M8: BIOS and Software ASRock M8: CPU and Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

78 Comments

View All Comments

  • IanCutress - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    How so? Please send me an email (ian AT anandtech DOT com) with suggestions and comments.
  • Navvie - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    BMW designed this? Clearly not the same guys who design their cars.... if their cars were this fugly, nobody would by them, ever.

    Also some of the sentence structures in this article are hard to read...
    eg. "ASRock now come to the market with the M8 barebones based on a BMW design for the Z87 platform, at half the width of the Bitfenix Prodigy and a high build quality."

    Makes me think the design for the case is based on BMW's design for the Z87. Some far off successor to their Z3 and Z4 cars.

    "ASRock now come to the market with the M8, a barebones for their Z87 platform, designed by BMW." Would be better, but still not right.
  • CknSalad - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    It's good to see the SFF market finally gaining much needed steam with intriguing products such as this one. That said, I honestly prefer small shoebox-sized cases like the sg05 or the small tower cases like the crowd-funded Ncase M1, which I actually currently own :D.

    I'm okay with mid-tower and full tower cases as there will always be a want/need for an enthusiast market, but the DIY desktop market really needs to start making a lot more M-Atx cases that are around the size of the Silverstone SG10 or TJ08-E. If more cases like the Asrock M8 come up, I'm sure that the desktop market will garner more interest from the Average Joe consumer.
  • ImSpartacus - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    "The mini-ITX motherboard designed specifically for the chassis forgoes any significant power delivery and heatsink design, which is perhaps an oversight – for this build I went for a an i7 CPU but a low power 'T' model SKU so as not to overload or burn out the power delivery. ASRock state that the fans they supply below the motherboard help with the VRM cooling and thus nothing should stop a user placing an i7-4770K into the system, but overclocking longevity might be limited. I decided to apply some brain and use common sense for our test build here."

    This paragraph feels a little un-Anandtech.

    I'm used to reasoned arguments supported by buckets of objective data. This paragraph feels further from that and closer to FUD territory.

    Granted, I have no reason to agree or disagree with the point raised in that paragraph, but that's really the problem. For me, an Anandtech article educates its audience and let's the audience do most of the conclusion-determining.
  • kyuu - Saturday, January 4, 2014 - link

    Can't say I agree. This is a tech blog, not a science journal. The writers' personal opinions and foibles come into play all the time, and that's fine.
  • Death666Angel - Monday, January 6, 2014 - link

    So he should have pushed the platform until it burns out to prove or disprove what they said? What exactly is the FUD part for you? Seems like he gave us the AsRock PR line and his assessment of it. Going much further would increase the cost and risk by quite a lot, something he probably thought was not needed, and I have to agree.
  • ol1bit - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    Seems pricey. I built a media/steam PC with Window 7 for much cheaper than that. Runs everything I want it to, plus is stylish. an i3, 4GB, Nivida 650.

    Case isn't made anymore, but can be seen here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000CQBISA/ref=oh...
  • Jonpet - Saturday, January 4, 2014 - link

    What`s with that presentation? Please place common object for size reference in at least one photo!Thanks.
  • CalaverasGrande - Saturday, January 4, 2014 - link

    at that BOM it is almost getting into New Mac Pro price range.
    Though the comparable Mac would have less storage, but a better CPU and GPU (well...debatable).
    It certainly would have faster ram and external connectivity.
  • Death666Angel - Monday, January 6, 2014 - link

    How is 50% cheaper getting into Mac Pro price range?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now