Performance Metrics

The NUC was evaluated using our standard test suite for low power desktops / industrial PCs. Note that some of the benchmarks are pretty recent (such as x264 v5.0 and 3D Mark 2013). Loaner samples haven't been tested with these new benchmarks. Therefore, the list of PCs in each graph are not the same.

Windows Experience Index:

Our NUC build clocks in at 5.3 in Windows 8's experience index. The weak point here is the HD5000 graphics, as expected.

Users looking for more graphics power within a similar form factor would do well to look at Gigabyte's BRIX Pro which comes with Intel's Iris Pro graphics.

Futuremark Benchmarks:

Futuremark PCMark 7

Futuremark 3DMark 11

Futuremark 3DMark 2013

Futuremark 3DMark 2013

Miscellaneous Benchmarks:

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R11.5

Video Encoding - x264 5.0

Video Encoding - x264 5.0

These are impressive benchmark numbers when the size of the system is taken into consideration.

Hardware and Setup Impressions Networking Performance and Streaming Aspects
Comments Locked

107 Comments

View All Comments

  • nico_mach - Saturday, January 4, 2014 - link

    That's why apple fans (repeat customers) purchase their PCs as soon as they're released, which is good for Apple PR.

    I think that difference is seriously overblown, however. The processor details, especially on a desktop PC, are getting more irrelevant.

    For HTPCs, the performance has been good enough for a while.
  • Jan-Willem Arnold - Sunday, January 25, 2015 - link

    Yes, the price will get close to a Mac Mini.
    And then:
    - A Mac Mini will retain its value over time very well. You can sell it after some years for a good price.With a NUC, you can probably forget about that.
    - OSX - which is great.
    - Thunderbolt ports
    - Better case
    - Built in power supply
    - Supports high end audio when you use a DAC, the clock form the DAC can trigger OSX, which is great.
    - Great drivers, everything works out of the box
    - They built it, tested it and will support it for you. Apple takes a lot of responsibility to make sure everything works well together, where other manufacturers offer just the bare hardware and ask almost the same amount.
  • cgalyon - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    I am curious how this compares to the less expensive BRIX models and the less expensive version of the NUC (around $250 at Newegg).
  • hfm - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    I must be the only one that didn't know what the F** a NUC was...

    Even their own site doesn't say unless you can see behind the play button on the video intro on the bottom..
    http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/nuc/overvie...

    That said, how is this different from other VESA mount units in the past?
  • xodusgenesis - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    Why would you choose this over a Raspberry PI for XBMC? $45<$600+
  • Alketi - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    xodusgenesis, the i3 NUC is more like $400, but to answer the question:
    1. Flawless playback of high-bit rate bluray rips.
    2. Support/passthrough for _all_ forms of HD multichannel audio.

    There are others, but those are my main reasons.
  • patterson32 - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    Are there quieter 3rd party fans available? I'd get one of the fanless cases but they're huge and can cost a lot compared to the board.
  • patterson32 - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    I hope this board layout, nano-ITX or pico-ITX gets more popular among motherboard and case makers. Sometimes, I want to put something together that may not actually be super small but want to have a lot of internal space for other things.
  • morganf - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    No comment on the CIR sensor? Did you try testing it with one or more types of remote controls to see how well it works and what it is compatible with?
  • quillaja - Friday, January 3, 2014 - link

    I have almost this same NUC build (but I went with 16gb RAM and a 240gb Intel SSD). So far I'm quite happy with it. My favorite thing is using DP 1.2 MST to drive 2 monitors. I'm glad all 4 usb ports are USB3, though I don't have any USB3 devices.

    The bad thing I encountered is drivers. Win 8.1 x64 didn't detect and install drivers for the AC7260 wifi card automatically, which of course handicapped the rest of the install due to lack of internet connection. Therefore I had to install most of the drivers manually, which, these days, is pretty lame in my opinion. There are still 3 "unknown" devices in device manager which haven't been addressed by windows.

    I've had this NUC since Thanksgiving, so hopefully MS/Intel have corrected the driver issue I experienced.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now