Company of Heroes 2

Our second benchmark in our benchmark suite is Relic Games’ Company of Heroes 2, the developer’s World War II Eastern Front themed RTS. For Company of Heroes 2 Relic was kind enough to put together a very strenuous built-in benchmark that was captured from one of the most demanding, snow-bound maps in the game, giving us a great look at CoH2’s performance at its worst. Consequently if a card can do well here then it should have no trouble throughout the rest of the game.

Our first strategy game is also our first game that is flat out AFR incompatible, and as a result the only way to get the best performance out of Company of Heroes 2 is with the fastest single-GPU card available. To that end this is a very clear victory for the 290X, and in fact will be the largest lead for the 290X of all of our benchmarks. At 2560 it’s a full 29% faster than the GTX 780, which all but puts the 290X in a class of its own. This game also shows some of the greatest gains for the 290X over the 280X, with the 290X surpassing its Tahti based predecessor by an equally chart topping 41%. It’s not clear what it is at this time that Company of Heroes 2 loves about 290X in particular, but as far as this game is concerned AMD has put together an architecture that maps well to the game’s needs.

Briefly, because of a lack of AFR compatibility 4K is only barely attainable with any kind of GPU setup. In fact we’re only throwing in the scale-less SLI/CF numbers to showcase that fact. We had to dial down our quality settings to Low on CoH2 in order to get a framerate above 30fps; even though we can be more liberal about playable framerates on strategy games, there still needs to be a cutoff for average framerates around that point. As a result 280X, GTX Titan, and 290X are the only cards to make that cutoff, with 290X being the clear winner. But the loss in quality to make 4K achievable is hardly worth the cost.

 

Moving on to minimum framerates, we see that at its most stressful points that nothing, not even 290X, can keep its minimums above 30fps. For a strategy game this is bearable, but we certainly wouldn’t mind more performance. AMD will be pleased though, as their performance advantage over the GTX 780 is only further extended here; a 29% average performance advantage becomes a 43% minimum performance advantage at 2560.

Finally, while we don’t see any performance advantages from AFR on this game we did run our FCAT benchmarks anyhow to quickly capture the delta percentages. Company of Heroes 2 has a higher than average variance even among single cards, which results in deltas being above 5%. The difference between 5% and 7% is not going to be too significant in practice here, but along with AMD’s performance advantage they do have slightly more consistent frame times than the GTX 780. Though in both the case of the 280X and the 290X we’re looking at what are essentially the same deltas, so while the 290X improves on framerates versus the 280X, it doesn’t bring with it any improvements in frame time consistency.

Metro: Last Light Bioshock Infinite
Comments Locked

396 Comments

View All Comments

  • Bloodcalibur - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    Your dumb ass paid $350 extra for computing performance when all you do is game LOL!
  • eddieveenstra - Sunday, October 27, 2013 - link

    +10
  • blau808 - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    The 780ti will easily beat the 290 for price/performance
  • Black Obsidian - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    So you're anticipating greater than Titan performance for less than 290X pricing?

    If so, you might be interested in this bridge I have for sale. It's in Brooklyn. In good shape, available real cheap.
  • Bloodcalibur - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    Titan is a gaming/workstation hybrid. That's why it costs $350 more than 780 with only a small gaming performance increase. You sounded really ignorant there lolol.
  • erple2 - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    Too easy. Too easy. You need to actually read the post Above you before commenting on the price comparison.
  • rituraj - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    No.
  • Naxirian - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    Lol.... except it loses to the 780 in a bunch of benchmarks, a card that has already been on the market for 6 months and costs exactly the same as the R9 290X does. Not to mention the 780 Ti is due out next month, and from the looks of these benchmarks, will probably murder the 290X whilst being in the same price range. AMD are late to the party yet again. Wonder what they'll do when Nvidia launch the 800 series next year lol. Probably wait 9 months and then launch another out-dated gen like this time.
  • extide - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    What planet are you on? The 290x is $100 cheaper, NOT the same price. AMD also had the 7970 out before nVidia had any 28nm cards out, so they weren't behind. Right now the 290x is the best bang/buck card period, and if you game in 4K it is THE best card. Facts are facts man....
  • QuantumPion - Thursday, October 24, 2013 - link

    According to the benchmarks it is only faster than the Titan at 4k resolution (probably due to its 4 gb ram and higher memory bandwidth). At normal resolutions it is about on par with the 780 depending on the game. So it is about on par with the 780 and ~$50 cheaper - we've yet to see what the 780 Ti can do though. Why the article claims the 290X is faster than the Titan and only $550 makes it seem like it was written before the actual benchmarks were performed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now