Concluding the One max review is difficult. I have a lot of conflicting thoughts about the larger sized smartphones and the state of that market, which seems to serve two purposes independently. For users who either don’t want or can’t budget for a tablet, the larger sized phones seem to bridge a functional gap between smartphone and tablet. Simultaneously, there are users who want the larger screen just to have it, and maybe there’s the perception that the larger phones still have some elevated status that comes with it. There’s a regional bias at play here too, and the One max seems to be a product designed to cater maybe more to some regions where supersized smartphones make up a bigger part of the market than others.

For me, the One max is probably a new upper bound in terms of size. It’s a very large phone, and although it fits in the front pockets of my jeans and shorts, it’s sometimes a stretch to sit down comfortably with the One max in a pocket. In terms of ergonomics, the One max is very much a dual-hand device. 

The One max is really a product designed to fill out a hole in HTC’s One series portfolio than anything else, and doesn’t really change up the formula too much. It’s literally a scaled up version of the HTC One with few changes – OIS is unfortunately gone, the screen is obviously huge, there’s now a microSD card slot, and of course the new fingerprint sensor. Other than that though, the One max really is the One scaled up to gigantic size, with parts of the One mini tossed in for good measure.

I’ve said my part on the fingerprint sensor on the One max already. It works but isn’t the best or most intuitive implementation to date, although I think it’s fairly easy to make the case that nobody, not even Apple, has nailed a fingerprint sensor yet. The fingerprint scanner’s location on the back makes sense when you’re holding the One max in one hand, but becomes a problem when you’re using the phone on a flat surface. The use of a swipe sensor as well makes positioning on the back somewhat problematic unless you enroll fingers at a natural angle.

There’s also that elephant in the room about platform, specifically HTC’s inclusion of Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T instead of the faster Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 we’re seeing devices start shipping with right now. Although 8064 is still plenty fast and no slouch, there’s still a perceptible performance delta between an 8064 device and the newer 8974 phones I have on my desk now. I worry a lot about whether HTC will fall behind on platform, especially since it used to be the one OEM always shipping new Qualcomm silicon first. I have a feeling the One max saw platform change at the last minute, delaying its launch, but that's almost entirely speculation.

If you want a larger-screened smartphone and liked the One but have been waiting for a long time for the One max, by all means, get it. If you want a larger screened smartphone however, I think it’s easy to make the case that there are better devices out there right now. Had the One max arrived a month or two after the launch of the original One, this conclusion would've likely been a very different one. 

Cellular, WiFi, Speakerphone
Comments Locked

197 Comments

View All Comments

  • RYF - Tuesday, October 29, 2013 - link

    The problem with the relentless rant of commenters with regard of the requirement of the SD card is that they have, in fact, ignored the reality that all will want to stuff their phones with media.

    My anecdotal observations in my social circle show that they do not need 16GB/32GB+64Gb of storage. It is good to have but they do not need it. And I have received complaints from SGS3 user that the 16GB built in memory has caused a great deal of problems in game app installtion as these apps are not transferrable to SD card.

    The demands for SD card slot is okay. There are many phones out there to choose from. But to condemn Brian for expressing his thoughts and to criticitizing the every device manufacturers out there not to have the SD card slot is definitely irrational. We have choices here. And we should respect the different choices.
  • Sm0kes - Thursday, October 31, 2013 - link

    Agreed. Expandability is a feature that many value. I personally don't. To each their own.
  • willis936 - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    Love the review. I hadn't even heard of this phone coming out.

    I know it's a bit much to ask this but could you start doing a more intensive audio benchmark suite on phones and tablets? It's very often overlooked but a lot of people will use the devices they keep on them as sources (usually pull down from the cloud) and THD+N and response numbers and graphs would be very helpful in making decisions.
  • cheinonen - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    We have something in the works for this. Hopefully it happens soon, because it will be awesome when it does.
  • synaesthetic - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    Output impedance PLEASE.
  • Impulses - Monday, November 11, 2013 - link

    +1000
  • ZeDestructor - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    Still no review of any Sony gear....

    Any news on that Brian?
  • Brian Klug - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    I'll review it when they send it, still got nothing.

    -Brian
  • Myrandex - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    Too bad that statement doesn't apply to new Nokia phones :/
  • superflex - Tuesday, October 29, 2013 - link

    The phone for the 1%.
    Yeah, everybody's dying to hear about another Windows fail phone

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now