The Sapphire R9 280X Toxic Review
by Ryan Smith on October 10, 2013 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
- Radeon
- Sapphire
- Tahiti
- Radeon 200
Final Words
Bringing our review of Sapphire’s R9 280X Toxic to a close, our experience with the card and our results prove that Sapphire has fundamentally achieved what they have set out to do: they’ve put together the fastest R9 280X card. It’s 13% faster than a stock 280X and it’s still 5% faster than the factory overclocked Asus card we looked at earlier this week. Out of the box the Toxic even maintains a hair’s lead over the Asus card when the Asus card is overclocked, which means we’re looking at a card that’s arguably competitive at stock with end user overclocked cards.
With that said while this isn’t necessarily a head-to-head article between the 280X Toxic and the Asus 280X DirectCU II TOP, it’s a logical comparison we have to make given the fact that both are factory overclocked 280X cards shooting for strong out of the box performance. For gaming workloads the 280X Toxic cleanly and clearly beats the Asus card here by a meaningful performance amount. However Asus is absolutely a spoiler here due to their aggressive pricing and their very quiet cooler. Their 280X DCUII TOP can’t match the Toxic, but it’s $40 cheaper and over 5dB quieter. Consequently if all you want is the fastest 280X on the market then Sapphire’s 280X Toxic is clearly the card to get, otherwise the Asus card is worth a consideration for its better price/performance ratio and cooling performance. As is almost always the case for factory overclocked cards there is a price to pay for the very fastest card, both in literal cost and in power and acoustics.
Meanwhile we’ll also quickly point out that the 280X Toxic ends up being faster than a stock GTX 770 by several percent for $50 less. But that’s a tricky comparison at best since we’re now comparing different cooler types (blower versus open air), a significant difference in power consumption, and it doesn’t take into account any of the customized GTX 770 cards. But it’s at least food for thought.
On a final note, since we’re looking at AMD’s second-tier cards – 290X is still due to arrive – given Sapphire’s $349 MSRP any purchasers may want to hold off for a bit until we have pricing and performance information for AMD’s new top-tier lineup. If they were to deliver a strong $400 card then the 280X Toxic likely wouldn’t make as much sense. But that’s something we won’t know for sure until the 290X is launched. It is however something to at least consider given the significant mark-up on the 280X Toxic over a standard 280X.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
84 Comments
View All Comments
ShieTar - Monday, October 14, 2013 - link
Word of Advice: Also check German shops for new cards, you can get the 280X for 300€ (408$), and delivery to the UK is 13€ (18$) usually. Not a big difference on this card right now, but worth checking whenever you look for a new card. German c't magazine has a nice comparison site that can find the best price all over Europe:http://www.heise.de/preisvergleich/eu/
Of course, sometimes it can make even more sense to import the 309$ card from the US and just pay the VAT at customs (61$).
Gunbuster - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Nice to see AMD cars not in that cheap ass ATI happy meal plastic red.AssBall - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Because Tonka Truck yellow is your favorite color?ninjaquick - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Head over to www.bjorn3d if you are curious about what happens when the full 375 are tapped for juice. Nothing anywhere as comprehensive as here, but still pretty interesting :)Impulses - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Given the small price premium, ASUS still has the best combination of warranty/noise vs cooling/stock OC, IMO. Would've liked to see MSI or GB samples.MrSpadge - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Agreed - the cooler on the Asus is most impressive and would decide things for me, if I didn't already have my GTX660Ti.yacoub35 - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Wow, Sapphire finally learned that it's important to cool the VRMs. About time...Here's hoping they've also improved the quality of the fans on their cards, too. Every Sapphire card I've owned (3-4 of them over the years) either had the fan die or start to click or buzz within 6-9 months of owning it, one a lot sooner.
The Von Matrices - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
I completely disagree with this card being classified as "double slot." The heatsink takes up 2.5 slots, and the backplate renders the slot above useless for any card that needs the full slot width. The only thing "double slot" about this card is the PCI bracket. This needs to be clearly stated in the article.Casecutter - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Not a fan of the Tonka truck color most as it would have folk think I bought a Zotac. ;-)Nothing a carbon faux fiber applique wouldn't fix.
jenesis33 - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link
Looking to build a new PC... so considering this card.http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/za...
Kitguru has shown a very low noise level for this card.. which is vastly different to test result here?
Any suggestion of reasons?