Ever since the arrival of the Nexus 10, it’s been hard recommending other, lower resolution 10-inch Android tablets. Although not the knock out success that the Nexus 7 became, the Nexus 10 did offer a good alternative to the iPad at a lower price. Given that Samsung made the aforementioned 10-inch Nexus, complete with 2560 x 1600 display, we wondered when a similar panel might grace Samsung’s own tablet lineup. A few weeks ago we got the answer we’ve been waiting almost a year for.

The latest iteration of Samsung’s Galaxy Note 10.1, aptly named the 2014 Edition, ships with the firm’s own 10.1-inch 2560 x 1600 display. It’s not display alone that Samsung hopes to sell its latest Note 10.1 on, the rest of the package is similarly specced to the max.

Unlike the Galaxy Note 3 where the majority of devices sold will likely use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800, the new Note 10.1 uses Samsung’s own Exynos 5420 SoC for all WiFi models. It’s only the LTE versions that will leverage Qualcomm silicon, but WiFi tablets still sell extremely well. All of this makes the 2014 Edition the first Samsung Android device to ship with its own Cortex A15 silicon in the US since the Nexus 10.

Add 3GB of RAM, tick the 802.11ac box and all you’re missing is USB 3.0 from the Galaxy Note 3. The result is Samsung’s first truly high end 10.1-inch Android tablet since the Nexus 10, and as its name implies, it comes with an S Pen. The entire bundle comes at a $150 premium to the much lower specced Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 and to the Galaxy Note 8.0:

  Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
Dimensions 243.1 x 171.4 x 7.9mm 210.8 x 135.6 x 7.95mm 210.8 x 135.6 x 7.95mm
Display 10.1-inch 2560 x 1600 Super Clear LCD 10.1-inch 1280 x 800 LCD 8.0-inch 1280 x 800 LCD
Weight 535g (WiFi) 510g (WiFi) 338g (WiFi)
Processor 1.8GHz Samsung Exynos 5420 (4 x Cortex A15/4 x Cortex A7, Mali-T628MP6)

1.6GHz Intel Atom Z2560 (2 x Atom , PowerVR SGX544MP2)

1.6GHz Samsung Exynos 4412 (4 x Cortex A9, Mali 400MP4)

Connectivity WiFi , Optional 3G/4G LTE WiFi , Optional 3G/4G LTE WiFi , Optional 3G/4G LTE
Memory 3GB 1GB 2GB
Storage 16GB—64GB + microSD 16GB/32GB + microSD 16GB/32GB + microSD
Battery 31Wh 25.84Wh ~17Wh
Starting Price $549 $399 $399



Balancing a desire to make tons of sweet cash with criticisms about material quality, Samsung revamped its 2014 Note family with a new design. Rather than the smooth glossy plastic back we’ve seen with the previous generation of Notes, the Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition inherits the same back cover finished in faux leather from the Galaxy Note 3.

I’ve already gone into detail on the improvement this is over the previous slick plastic in our Galaxy Note 3 review, but in short it’s a good step forward. There’s a difference in finish between the white and black versions (the latter has more of a grip laden rubbery texture), but both are better than the previous generation. We’re still talking about injection molded plastic and not real leather, but it’s a big step forward and honestly feels quite good in hand. The fake stitching is a bit much for me personally, though those looking for a more organic feel might appreciate it.

The new Note 10.1 maintains roughly the same dimensions as the new Galaxy Tab 3 10.1, although with far better internals and display.

The usual design staples are all here. There’s a microSD card slot on the right hand side as well as stowage for the new S Pen. Up top you’ll find the power/lock switch and volume rocker. There’s a physical home button front and center, flanked by capacitive menu and back buttons. The design is distinctly Samsung.

Software & OS

The 2014 Edition of the Galaxy Note ships with Android 4.3, as well as the typical set of S Pen, multi-window and other productivity enhancements you’d expect from a Samsung Note device. I’ve already gone through these in our Galaxy Note 3 review as well as in our Galaxy Note 8.0 review, so I’ll point you there for more details. In short, the S Pen is an interesting productivity addition to a tablet. It does a reasonable job of approximating a pen and paper experience, although understandably with more lag than you're used to (along with some other quirks). 

CPU & Performance

The 5420 is Samsung’s second Exynos 5 Octa SoC, pairing a quad-core Cortex A15 cluster with a quad-core Cortex A7 cluster. The Note 10.1’s implementation still only supports cluster migration, with either the Cortex A15 or Cortex A7 cluster being active at once, effectively making the chip a quad-core SoC in the eyes of the user and OS. The point of having both A15 and A7 clusters on board is to be able to switch between the two depending on workload demands. If you need performance, a quad-core Cortex A15 is at your disposal, running at up to 1.8GHz (up from 1.6GHz in the previous Exynos 5410). If you need battery life however, the Cortex A7 cluster takes over running at up to 1.3GHz in the 5420 (up from 1.2GHz). Switching between the two is seamless as far as the OS is concerned, and for the first time the two clusters have a functioning cache coherent interconnect between the two (although it's not leveraged in the Note 10.1's implementation). Ideally Samsung’s implementation would go one step further and feature a cache shared between both clusters (rather than a 2MB L2 for the A15 cluster and 512KB L2 for the A7 cluster), but we’re still in the early days of big.LITTLE.

The 5420 performs understandably quite well. In lightly threaded tests the Note 10.1 pulls ahead of the old Nexus 10, but in those that exploit the tablet’s four A15 cores we see a significant jump forward. Samsung was able to deliver a relatively good experience with four Cortex A9 cores in their Galaxy Note 8, the new Note 10.1’s underlying hardware just does an even better job.

The four A15s are generally quicker then Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800/Krait 400s, but typically fall short of Intel's Atom Z3770 under Android as well as Apple's Cyclone cores in the A7.

SunSpider 0.9.1 Benchmark

SunSpider 1.0 Benchmark

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark (Stock Browser)

Google Octane v1

Vellamo 2.0.2 - HTML5

Vellamo 2.0.2 - Metal


GPU & NAND Performance
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • lilmoe - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link

    You guys do realize that Sunspider, Octane, Kraken, and other similar benchmarks are all BROWSER benchmarks, right? They reflect the javascript rendering performance of the browser more than anything... This isn't comparing apples to apples, and it most definitely doesn't show actual difference among different CPUs, ESPECIALLY that they're not running on the same platform, let alone the same browser!
  • dwade123 - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link

    I just can't find a use for Android tablet. Like literally. Can't do work, and only superficial entertainment at extremely low standards. It's a shame Windows 8.1 tablets are overpriced.
  • thesavvymage - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link

    Seriously. The only things I do on mine are browse reddit, watch videos, and use emulators. Anything else I want to do I can't because of limitations with the browser, or the browser being slow, or Android not having the apps I want.
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 2, 2013 - link

    You can browse the web and annotate documents and slides. I won't buy any tablet without active digitizers.
  • AEdouard - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    Yeah, but you know, with its great display and low price, the New nexus 7 is a good buy even if it's just to browse the web, consume content, check emails and play some games. When I want to do more complicated stuff, I use my Macbook.
  • Streamlined - Saturday, October 5, 2013 - link

    It's a shame Windows tablets are so big and heavy.
  • ESC2000 - Thursday, October 10, 2013 - link

    I can't find use for an iPad: expensive (no good cheap option like the nexus 7 2013) and very limited functionality from a productivity standpoint (no multi window, no stylus, no swype, no useful windows programs like office).... It's literally a blown up iPhone. You can't do anything more on it. Since it's not a productivity device (aside from the determined hipsters who I see slowly pecking out their papers on their iPads even though it's taking them twice as long without multi window and office), it must be a consumption device. That it does well but why spend so much more money when you can get a great android consumption device for much less?
  • abazigal - Friday, October 11, 2013 - link

    The problem then comes when consumers are not getting more of what they want (in an Android tablet), but instead being saddled with more issues that they need to contend with. Apple devices just work right out of the box.

    The next issue is that you need to understand and accept that different people have different definitions of productivity. For example, I am using my ipad quite extensively in the classroom, from recording screencasts in educreations to annotating on pdfs through notability.

    Third, Android still lags behind IOS when it comes to optimised tablet apps. Are you really going to pay so much for a tablet, only to run blown-up phone apps?

    I can go on, but all in all, people get what they pay for.
  • XFire99 - Sunday, October 13, 2013 - link

    Right out the box is total bull.
    1. Iphone/Ipad need to be activated before can use.
    - Itunes that need a computer.
    - WiFi that needs internet access.
    - Cellular that are not available in all areas.

    Also I NEVER understand in which way android devices is not working direct out of the box? Configurations/widgets isnt a must to start to use the device.

    2nd issue is u self do ned to understand that android tabs can also do same thing.

    3rd issue.Is the only thing u are right about. Android tabs apps are way behind iOS tabs apps. The problem there are way more android tabs with different resolutions and iOS have only 2 tabs models. Much way easier to optimize then android tabs.
    But iOS starts to face this problem too, with IP5S/C release and iOS 7. Sooner IPad5/mini.
  • pSupaNova - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link

    The Dimensions on the table for the Galaxy tab 3 10.1 don't look correct.

    Good review as always.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now