To start, we want to thank the many manufacturers who have donated kit for our test beds in order to make this review, along with many others, possible.

Thank you to OCZ for providing us with 1250W Gold Power Supplies.
Thank you to G.Skill for providing us with memory kits.
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with an AX1200i PSU and 16GB 2400C10 memory.
Thank you to ASUS for providing us with the AMD GPUs and some IO Testing kit.
Thank you to ECS for providing us with the NVIDIA GPUs.
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with the Corsair H80i CLC.
Thank you to Rosewill for providing us with the 500W Platinum Power Supply for mITX testing, BlackHawk Ultra, and 1600W Hercules PSU for extreme dual CPU + quad GPU testing, and RK-9100 keyboards.

Also many thanks go to the manufacturers who over the years have provided review samples which contribute to this review.  For this Intel update we would particularly like to thank Gigabyte for loaning the Haswell and Nehalem CPUs!

Testing Methodology

In order to keep the testing fair, we set strict rules in place for each of these setups.  For every new chipset, the SSD was formatted and a fresh installation of the OS was applied.  The chipset drivers for the motherboard were installed, along with NVIDIA drivers then AMD drivers.  The games were preinstalled on a second partition, but relinked to ensure they worked properly. The games were then tested as follows:

Metro 2033: Benchmark Mode, two runs of four scenes of Frontline at 1440p, max settings.  First run of four is discarded, average of second run is taken (minus outliers).
Dirt3: Benchmark Mode, four runs of the first scene with 8 cars at 1440p, max settings.  Average is taken.
Civilization V: One five minute run of the benchmark mode accessible at the command line, at 1440p and max settings.  Results produced are total frames in sets of 60 seconds, average taken.
Sleeping Dogs: Using the Adrenaline benchmark software, four scenes at 1440p in Ultra settings.  Average is taken.

If the platform was being used for the next CPU (e.g. Maximus V Formula, moving from FX-8150 to FX-8350), no need to reinstall.  If the platform is changed for the next test, a full reinstall and setup takes place.

How to Read This Review

Due to the large number of different variables in our review, it is hard to accurately label each data point with all the information about that setup.  It also stands to reason that just putting the CPU model is also a bad idea when the same CPU could be in two different motherboards with different GPU lane allocations.  There is also the memory aspect to consider, as well as if a motherboard uses MCT at stock.  Here is a set of labels correlating to configurations you will see in this review:

CPU[+] [CP] (PCIe version – lane allocation to GPUs [PLX])

e.g. A10-5800K (2 – x16/x16): A10-5800K with two GPUs in PCIe 2.0 mode

- First is the name of the CPU, then an optional + identifier for MCT enabled motherboards. 
 - CP indicates we are dealing with a Bulldozer derived CPU and using the Core Parking updates. 
 - Inside the circular brackets is the PCIe version of the lanes we are dealing with, along with the lane allocation to each GPU. 
 - The final flag is if a PLX chip is involved in lane allocation.

This one of the more complex configurations:

i7-3770K+ (3 – x8/x8/x8/x8 PLX)

Which means an i7-3770K (with MCT) powering four GPUs in PCIe 3.0 via a PLX chip

Common Configuration Points

All the system setups below have the following consistent configurations points:

- A fresh install of Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
- Either an Intel Stock CPU Cooler, a Corsair H80i CLC or Thermalright TRUE Copper
- OCZ 1250W Gold ZX Series PSU or Corsair AX1200i PSU for SP
- Rosewill 1600W Hercules for DP systems
- Up to 4x ASUS AMD HD 7970 GPUs, using Catalyst 13.1
- Up to 2x ECS NVIDIA GTX 580 GPUs, using GeForce WHQL 310.90
- SSD Boot Drives, OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB
- LG GH22NS50 Optical Drives
- Open Test Beds, either a DimasTech V2.5 EasyHard or a CoolerMaster Test Lab

CPU and Motherboard Configurations

Those listed as ‘Part 2’ are new for this update.

Part 1 A6-3650 + Gigabyte A75-UD4H + 16GB DDR3-1866 8-10-10
Part 1 A8-3850 + ASRock A75 Extreme6 + 16GB DDR3 1866 8-10-10
Part 1 A8-5600K + Gigabyte F2A85-UP4 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-10-10
Part 1 A10-5800K + Gigabyte F2A85-UP4 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-10-10
Part 1 X2-555 BE + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3 1600 8-8-8
Part 1 X4-960T + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8
Part 1 X6-1100T + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8
Part 1 FX-8150 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-11
Part 1 FX-8350 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-10
Part 1 FX-8150 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-11 + CP
Part 1 FX-8350 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-10 + CP
Part 1 E6400 + MSI i975X Platinum + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1 E6700 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 4-5-5
Part 1 Xeon X5690 + EVGA SR-2 + 6GB DDR3 1333 6-7-7
Part 1 2x Xeon X5690 + EVGA SR-2
Part 1 Celeron G465 + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i5-2500K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-2600K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i3-3225 + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1 i7-3770K + Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-3770K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2400 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-3930K + ASUS Rampage IV Extreme + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-12
Part 1 i7-3960X + ASRock X79 Professional + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-12
Part 1b E6400 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 4-5-5
Part 1b E6550 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1b Q9400 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1b i7-4770K + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1b i7-4770K + ASUS Z87-Pro + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1b i7-4770K + MSI Z87A-GD65 Gaming + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 A6-5200 + ASRock IMB-A180-H + 8GB DDR3-1333 9-9-10
Part 2 Fusion E-350 + Zotac Fusion-A-E + 8GB DDR3-1066 7-7-7
Part 2 i7-4770K + MSI Z87 XPower + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 4x E5-4650L + SuperMicro + 128GB DDR3 1600 11-11-11
Part 2 2x E5-2690 + Gigabyte GA-7PESH1 + 32GB DDR3-1600 11-11-11
Part 2 Celeron 847 + ECS NM70-I2 + 8GB DDR3-1333 9-9-9
Part 2 i7-920 + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-950 + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-990X + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-920 + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-950 + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-990X + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i5-4430 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 i7-4670K + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Xeon E3-1280 v3 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Xeon E3-1285 v3 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Via L2007 + ECS VX900-I + 8GB DDR3-1066 7-7-7

Our first port of call with all our testing is CPU throughput analysis, using our regular motherboard review benchmarks.

CPUs, GPUs, Motherboards, and Memory CPU Benchmarks
Comments Locked

137 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    To finish that thought, I do wish Intel still had some mainstream (aka cheaper) 130W CPUs on their normal platform.
  • just4U - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    Yep.. you should also be able to tell the difference simply by measuring heat.. The SandyB's tend to run a little cooler than the IvyB although they must have done something in Haswell since it does run cooler in normal operation.. but heats up rather quickly under load just like the IvyB. But on the surface their all fairly comparable I think anyway.
  • brucek2 - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    My main system is still rocking an i7-920. These charts help explain rationally what my brain must have somehow known subconsciously: that there's not yet much reason to upgrade. (I'm discounting the +50% gains on the CPU benchmarks, because my i7-920 is overclocked, making the gains much less. And I'm rarely CPU bound for long.)

    I would like a 6GB/sec SATA controller some day. My poor SSDs must be very frustrated with their host.
  • Senti - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    I'm in a similar boat: using i7-930 @4GHz. Seriously, who runs those wonderful Nehalem CPUs on default clocks when they easily overclock 1.5x? And with this overclock advantage of the newer CPUs is really underwhelming: far less than i7-920 line here shows.

    As for SSD, I use PCI-E based one and it's probably still faster or at least on par with newest SATA ones.
  • A5 - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    My 920 refused to go over 3 GHz after I updated the BIOS one day. Before that I still only got 3.5 or so.

    My 4770K is a crappy overclocker, too. Maybe it's just me :-p
  • cbrownx88 - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    A5 - was your 920 a C0 stepping? Mine is a D0, which at the time of purchase I remember going way out of my way to check the stepping before pulling the trigger
  • BOMBOVA - Saturday, October 26, 2013 - link

    i put in a value pcie 6 Gbs, Syba controller card, only capable of 32k or 64k blocks, but is value at less than fifty bucks. works well,
  • ninjaquick - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    Isn't Win7 old? Benchmarks like these should be run on the latest Windows, at least IMHO.
  • brucek2 - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    Hasn't Win8 been rejected by large numbers of desktop enthusiasts & gamers? Its adoption rate on older platforms like many included here is pitiful.

    Fortunately my sense from other articles is that its not likely to have made a significant difference either way?
  • DanNeely - Thursday, October 3, 2013 - link

    The Steam HW survey has W8 at 16.4% vs 66.8% for W7.

    I suspect W7 is being used in order to keep results directly comparable to historic results.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now