To start, we want to thank the many manufacturers who have donated kit for our test beds in order to make this review, along with many others, possible.

Thank you to OCZ for providing us with 1250W Gold Power Supplies.
Thank you to G.Skill for providing us with memory kits.
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with an AX1200i PSU and 16GB 2400C10 memory.
Thank you to ASUS for providing us with the AMD GPUs and some IO Testing kit.
Thank you to ECS for providing us with the NVIDIA GPUs.
Thank you to Corsair for providing us with the Corsair H80i CLC.
Thank you to Rosewill for providing us with the 500W Platinum Power Supply for mITX testing, BlackHawk Ultra, and 1600W Hercules PSU for extreme dual CPU + quad GPU testing, and RK-9100 keyboards.

Also many thanks go to the manufacturers who over the years have provided review samples which contribute to this review.  For this Intel update we would particularly like to thank Gigabyte for loaning the Haswell and Nehalem CPUs!

Testing Methodology

In order to keep the testing fair, we set strict rules in place for each of these setups.  For every new chipset, the SSD was formatted and a fresh installation of the OS was applied.  The chipset drivers for the motherboard were installed, along with NVIDIA drivers then AMD drivers.  The games were preinstalled on a second partition, but relinked to ensure they worked properly. The games were then tested as follows:

Metro 2033: Benchmark Mode, two runs of four scenes of Frontline at 1440p, max settings.  First run of four is discarded, average of second run is taken (minus outliers).
Dirt3: Benchmark Mode, four runs of the first scene with 8 cars at 1440p, max settings.  Average is taken.
Civilization V: One five minute run of the benchmark mode accessible at the command line, at 1440p and max settings.  Results produced are total frames in sets of 60 seconds, average taken.
Sleeping Dogs: Using the Adrenaline benchmark software, four scenes at 1440p in Ultra settings.  Average is taken.

If the platform was being used for the next CPU (e.g. Maximus V Formula, moving from FX-8150 to FX-8350), no need to reinstall.  If the platform is changed for the next test, a full reinstall and setup takes place.

How to Read This Review

Due to the large number of different variables in our review, it is hard to accurately label each data point with all the information about that setup.  It also stands to reason that just putting the CPU model is also a bad idea when the same CPU could be in two different motherboards with different GPU lane allocations.  There is also the memory aspect to consider, as well as if a motherboard uses MCT at stock.  Here is a set of labels correlating to configurations you will see in this review:

CPU[+] [CP] (PCIe version – lane allocation to GPUs [PLX])

e.g. A10-5800K (2 – x16/x16): A10-5800K with two GPUs in PCIe 2.0 mode

- First is the name of the CPU, then an optional + identifier for MCT enabled motherboards. 
 - CP indicates we are dealing with a Bulldozer derived CPU and using the Core Parking updates. 
 - Inside the circular brackets is the PCIe version of the lanes we are dealing with, along with the lane allocation to each GPU. 
 - The final flag is if a PLX chip is involved in lane allocation.

This one of the more complex configurations:

i7-3770K+ (3 – x8/x8/x8/x8 PLX)

Which means an i7-3770K (with MCT) powering four GPUs in PCIe 3.0 via a PLX chip

Common Configuration Points

All the system setups below have the following consistent configurations points:

- A fresh install of Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
- Either an Intel Stock CPU Cooler, a Corsair H80i CLC or Thermalright TRUE Copper
- OCZ 1250W Gold ZX Series PSU or Corsair AX1200i PSU for SP
- Rosewill 1600W Hercules for DP systems
- Up to 4x ASUS AMD HD 7970 GPUs, using Catalyst 13.1
- Up to 2x ECS NVIDIA GTX 580 GPUs, using GeForce WHQL 310.90
- SSD Boot Drives, OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB
- LG GH22NS50 Optical Drives
- Open Test Beds, either a DimasTech V2.5 EasyHard or a CoolerMaster Test Lab

CPU and Motherboard Configurations

Those listed as ‘Part 2’ are new for this update.

Part 1 A6-3650 + Gigabyte A75-UD4H + 16GB DDR3-1866 8-10-10
Part 1 A8-3850 + ASRock A75 Extreme6 + 16GB DDR3 1866 8-10-10
Part 1 A8-5600K + Gigabyte F2A85-UP4 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-10-10
Part 1 A10-5800K + Gigabyte F2A85-UP4 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-10-10
Part 1 X2-555 BE + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3 1600 8-8-8
Part 1 X4-960T + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8
Part 1 X6-1100T + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8
Part 1 FX-8150 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-11
Part 1 FX-8350 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-10
Part 1 FX-8150 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-11 + CP
Part 1 FX-8350 + ASUS Crosshair V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-10 + CP
Part 1 E6400 + MSI i975X Platinum + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1 E6700 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 4-5-5
Part 1 Xeon X5690 + EVGA SR-2 + 6GB DDR3 1333 6-7-7
Part 1 2x Xeon X5690 + EVGA SR-2
Part 1 Celeron G465 + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i5-2500K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-2600K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i3-3225 + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1 i7-3770K + Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 + 16GB DDR3-2133 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-3770K + ASUS Maximus V Formula + 16GB DDR3-2400 9-11-11
Part 1 i7-3930K + ASUS Rampage IV Extreme + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-12
Part 1 i7-3960X + ASRock X79 Professional + 16GB DDR3-2133 10-12-12
Part 1b E6400 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 4-5-5
Part 1b E6550 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1b Q9400 + ASUS P965 Commando + 4GB DDR2-666 5-6-6
Part 1b i7-4770K + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1b i7-4770K + ASUS Z87-Pro + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 1b i7-4770K + MSI Z87A-GD65 Gaming + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 A6-5200 + ASRock IMB-A180-H + 8GB DDR3-1333 9-9-10
Part 2 Fusion E-350 + Zotac Fusion-A-E + 8GB DDR3-1066 7-7-7
Part 2 i7-4770K + MSI Z87 XPower + 16GB DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 4x E5-4650L + SuperMicro + 128GB DDR3 1600 11-11-11
Part 2 2x E5-2690 + Gigabyte GA-7PESH1 + 32GB DDR3-1600 11-11-11
Part 2 Celeron 847 + ECS NM70-I2 + 8GB DDR3-1333 9-9-9
Part 2 i7-920 + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-950 + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-990X + Gigabyte X58-UD9 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-920 + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-950 + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i7-990X + ASRock X58 Extreme3 + 6GB DDR3-1866 7-8-7
Part 2 i5-4430 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 i7-4670K + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Xeon E3-1280 v3 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Xeon E3-1285 v3 + Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H + DDR3-2400 10-12-12
Part 2 Via L2007 + ECS VX900-I + 8GB DDR3-1066 7-7-7

Our first port of call with all our testing is CPU throughput analysis, using our regular motherboard review benchmarks.

CPUs, GPUs, Motherboards, and Memory CPU Benchmarks
Comments Locked

137 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ranger101 - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    Every time an article of this sort is written, the conclusion is the same. In the vast majority of cases, due to GPU bottlenecks, the performance differences between CPUs are so minimal that no-one would notice the difference in game. Yawn.

    This is the 3rd time I am posting this comment as it seems to be continually removed. Yet it is a legitimate and non offensive comment. What happened to freedom of expression at Anandtech?
  • Flunk - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    I'm seeing all three of your posts
  • dingetje - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    would be nice to see how the haswell pentiums (like the g3420) do as low budget low power gaming cpu.
    too bad none of the review sites so far have deemed them worthy of a review so far.
  • geok1ng - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    "Of course we would suggest Haswell over Ivy Bridge based on Haswell being that newer platform."

    If only Haswell OCs were equal to IB OCs. With Haswell you are STUCK at 4.2-4.6Ghz, depending on your luck, and going water wont help. With IB 4.4-5.0Ghz in usual, and the more money you invest in cooling , the better will be your OC. This luck of the draw in Haswell, and the walls in OCing at Z87 should be considered, especially at triple and quad GPU builds aiming at 4k gaming, where a bad overclock is the doom of the entire system.
  • coachingjoy - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    good job, like your work.
  • meliketrolls - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    Of course AMD CPUs will have better scores. It's just that... AMD is WAAAAY better than Intel.
  • R-Type - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    I have a Dell XPS 420 with Q6600. With the 8800GT (512 MB) card I was getting about 40 fps with medium settings. When I upgraded to a GTX 670, I got about 60 FPS with high settings, a very noticeable improvement. In my experience, a quad core Q6600 is still a pretty competent gamer with a strong graphics card on all but the most extreme games.
  • R3dox - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    I'm one of those with a D0 i7 920 and it's been running at 3.8GHz (19x200bclk with 'only' 1600C9 memory, 12GB) for over 4 years. I suppose I'll just have to wait for a nice native PCIe SSD to avoid the old SATA controller and I'm golden for a good while more. It's just my HD6970 that could use replacement at some point (1920x1200 reso, nothing crazy).
  • BOMBOVA - Friday, October 4, 2013 - link

    for my x58, i put in one of these "" SYBA SI-PEX40057 PCI-Express 2.0 "" fifty bucks, makes the newer ssd's rock, i am still happy with my platform and video work, and jpg work, is flash twice as good. " we love our i7-920"s " Cheers, good thread this, all power users, / good fun
  • R3dox - Sunday, October 6, 2013 - link

    When I upgraded to my current intel 520( due to being 3x bigger than previous ssd), I looked into such cards but they were pretty bad and except for sequencial 128kb read, slower than the intel sata controller. I see this is a new version of the marvell controller but is it actually comparable to an intel sata 3 controller this time?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now