Haswell isn't expected to launch until the beginning of June in desktops and quad-core notebooks, but Intel is beginning to talk performance. Intel used a mobile customer reference board in a desktop chassis featuring Haswell GT3 with embedded DRAM (the fastest Haswell GPU configuration that Intel will ship) and compared it to an ASUS UX15 with on-board NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M. 

Despite the chassis difference, Intel claims it will be able to deliver the same performance from the demo today in an identical UX15 chassis by the time Haswell ships.

The video below shows Dirt 3 running at 1080p on both systems, with identical detail settings (High Quality presets, no AA, vsync off). Intel wouldn't let us report performance numbers, but subjectively the two looked to deliver very similar performance. Note that I confirmed all settings myself and ran both games myself independently of the demo. You can be the judge using the video below:

Intel wouldn't let us confirm clock speeds on Haswell vs. the Core i7 (Ivy Bridge) system, but it claimed that the Haswell part was the immediate successor to its Ivy Bridge comparison point. 

As proof of Haswell's ability to fit in a notebook chassis, it did have another demo using older Haswell silicon running Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 in a notebook chassis. 

Haswell GT3e's performance looked great for processor graphics. I would assume that overall platform power would be reduced since you wouldn't have a discrete GPU inside, however there's also the question of the cost of the solution. I do expect that NVIDIA will continue to drive discrete GPU performance up, but as a solution for some of the thinner/space constrained form factors (think 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display, maybe 11-inch Ultrabook/MacBook Air?) Haswell could be a revolutionary step forward.

Comments Locked

252 Comments

View All Comments

  • iwod - Wednesday, January 9, 2013 - link

    My guess is that Intel isn't even anywhere close to GT650M Hardware wise, ( I would be surprised if they did ).

    Not to mention Intel Graphics Drivers is absolutely appalling.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, January 11, 2013 - link


    So amd crap breaking, broken, rebroken, never correct drivers are okay too then.
    Good to know.
  • Spunjji - Monday, January 14, 2013 - link

    Fanboy.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, February 1, 2013 - link

    Enduro dip****

    Case closed. Idiot liar fanboy, mirror, you.
  • duploxxx - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    great to see this performance, now the big Q will be. What CPU will ship with what kind of GPU.

    knowing intel in the past they screwed around a lot with GT1 GT2 in different CPU models, totally unbalanced.
  • CeriseCogburn - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    Wow like the first reasonable comment even with the poo pooing.
  • Rontalk - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    Yeah, Anandtech and Intel....!

    This how AMD Trinity were run Dirt 3 a year ago:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsmTDb-Mlws
  • yankeeDDL - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    How does this compare with AMD's existing APUs?
  • CeriseCogburn - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    It whips the crap out of them - as the 650M is a DISCRETE separate chip, not a gpu in a cpu.

    Yep, it smacks the ever loving crap out of all trinity.

    That's why they had to go with 650M /nVidia - they were being nice and didn't want to rub the amd fanboy noses in it.
  • Rontalk - Thursday, January 10, 2013 - link

    Are you joking? Because a big desktop 80W+ Intel APU was capable running an old game fluent?
    AMD Temash (less than 5W) APU capable run the newest Dirt Showdown in 1080p fluent;
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CV-U50Viv_k

    So forget your AMD fanboy crap talk, it is obvious Intel nowhere to AMD ;)!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now