The ARM vs x86 Wars Have Begun: In-Depth Power Analysis of Atom, Krait & Cortex A15
by Anand Lal Shimpi on January 4, 2013 7:32 AM EST- Posted in
- Tablets
- Intel
- Samsung
- Arm
- Cortex A15
- Smartphones
- Mobile
- SoCs
GPU Power Consumption - 3D Gaming Workload
While we don't yet have final GPU benchmarks under Windows RT/8 that we can share numbers from, the charts below show power consumption in the same DX title running through roughly the same play path. Tegra 3 remains the fastest in this test, followed by Adreno 225 and finally the PowerVR SGX 545/Atom solution. Power consumption roughly follows that same order, however Tegra 3 burns much more power in delivering that performance than either of the competitors. I'd be really interested to see how some of the higher performing Imagination cores do here.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
140 Comments
View All Comments
Kidster3001 - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
Samsung uses everyone's chips in their phones. Samsung, Qualcomm, TI... everyone's. I would not be surprised to see a Samsung phone with Atom in it eventually.jeffkibuule - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
They've never used other non-Samsung SoCs by choice, especially in their high end phones. They only used Qualcomm MSM8960 in the US GS III because Qualcomm's separate baseband MDM9615 wasn't ready. As soon as it was, we saw the Galaxy Note II use Exynos again. Nvidia and TI chips have been used in the low end from Samsung, but that's not profitable to anyone.Intel needs a major design win from a tier one OEM willing to put its chip inside their flagship phone, and with most phone OEMs actually choosing to start designing their own ARM SoCs (including even LG and Huawei), that task is getting a lot harder than you might think.
felixyang - Saturday, January 5, 2013 - link
some versions of Samsung's GS2 use TI's OMAP.iwod - Saturday, January 5, 2013 - link
Exactly like what is said above. If they have a choice they would rather use everything they produce themselves. Simply Because Wasted Fabs Space is expensive.Icehawk - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
I find these articles very interesting - however I'd really like to see an aggregate score/total for power usage, IOW what is the area under the curve? As discussed being quicker to complete at higher power can be more efficient - however when looking at a graph it is very hard to see what the total area is. Giving a total wattage used during the test (ie, area under curve) would give a much easier metric to read and it is the important #, not what the voltage maxes or minimums at but the overall usage over time/process IMO.extide - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
There are indeed several graphs that display total power used in joules, which is the area under the curve of the watts graphs. Maybe you missed them ?jwcalla - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
That's what the bar charts are showing.GeorgeH - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
It's already there. A Watt is a Joule/Second, so the area under the power/time graphs is measured in Watts * Seconds = Joules.Veteranv2 - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
Another Intel PR Article, it is getting really sad on this website.Now since you are still using Win8 which is garbage for ARM. Please us the correct software platform for ARM chips. I'd love to see those power measurements then.
Anandtech did it again. Pick the most favorable software platform for Intel, give the least favorable to ARM.
Way to go! Again....
Intel PR at its best...
Veteranv2 - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link
Oh wait its even better!They used totally different screens with almost 4 times the pixels on the nexus 10 and then says it requires more power to do benchmarks. Hahaha, this review gave me a good laugh. Even worse then the previous ones.
This might explain the lack of product overviews at the start.