ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 In The Box

When competing at the lower end of the market, it can be hard to distinguish a motherboard with the extras in the box.  The ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 currently e-tails at $100, meaning that if any significant additional inclusion was in the box, the ASRock board could be highly competitive in terms of bang-for-buck.  Alas, no such luck:

Driver CD
Manuals
Rear IO Shield
Four SATA Cables, Locking

There is a small amount of differentiation – typically motherboards at this range have only two SATA cables, whereas we get four with the ASRock.  Given the seven SATA ports on board, I would gladly take four rather than two.

ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 Overclocking

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.  

Automatic Overclock:

Using the X-Boost function at boot by pressing ‘X’, the system restarted and applied the top turbo clock of the processor for every level of load except idle.  This meant the A10-5800K was adjusted to 4200 MHz under any load.

In the BIOS, we get the option for 4200 MHz to 4600 MHz in 100 MHz increments – each of these was tested:

At the 4200 MHz setting, the system applied 1.13875 volts on the CPU as well as a +0.060 volt offset. The NB was given a +0.120 volt offset, while the memory was set at DDR3-1333.  This setting was stable in the OS.

At the 4300 MHz setting, the system applied the same settings as per the 4200 MHz situation but with a single increase in the CPU multiplier.  This setting was also stable.

At the 4400 MHz setting, the system adjusted up the offset on the CPU to +0.120 volts while still keeping the fixed voltage selection the same as previous settings.  This setting was stable in the OS.

At the 4500 MHz setting, the system upped the CPU voltage offset further to +0.180 volts.  This was stable in the OS.

At the 4600 MHz setting, the system adjusted the CPU in terms of both fixed and offset values, placing 1.4000 volts on the CPU and a +0.200 volt offset.  This setting failed stability during OCCT which produced an error on one of the CPU cores.

Manual Overclock:

For the first time in a long time, I am thoroughly stumped by manually overclocking a motherboard.  Unlike the previous FM2 boards we have tested, the ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 failed to enjoy many manual settings above 4.3 GHz.  When using the automatic settings above, everything was simple – but if I used the exact settings in a manual mode, the system would happily agree to boot at those speeds but fail to ramp up to full speed under load.  This was a very confusing scenario, meaning that while I could boot at 4.8 GHz, and CPU-Z briefly acknowledging the speed, when I loaded up PovRay or OCCT, the system would reduce to idle speeds and never come back up to full speed.  I thought that this was perhaps related to the AMD CPU Overdrive functionality in the AMD Control Center, but no combination of settings worked.

ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 Software Test Setup, Power Consumption, POST Time
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • Garestle - Thursday, March 26, 2020 - link

    Click on https://www.google.com/">google and get more info
  • slacr - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link

    I wish there were high end FM1-2 motherboards that include more than the standard 6-7 SATA ports. For a HTPC/storage solution with lower power consumption than my current P45/Q6600 setup, having to go really high end Z77 or similar in order to get to the 9-10 SATA port cards, or buying separate (expensive) sata controllers is not great.
  • ForeverAlone - Tuesday, December 4, 2012 - link

    Why the dual PCI-E slots? None of the APU processors are powerful enough to properly support crossfireX or SLI anyway. Pointless.

    Even the A10-5800K isn't going to have enough power to support a proper Crossfire setup. Crossfiring anything below a 6850 is a stupid idea. An A10 won't support crossfired 6850s.
  • CeriseCogburn - Sunday, December 9, 2012 - link

    Don't worry g, you are not alone - you are correct.
    It's called AMD fanboyism - and the marketing PR team decided so long as they hack out the insane non workable boards, the amd fanboys will buy them, telling themselves all is well in fanboyville.
  • Nil Einne - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Whoever told you two PCI express is only used for graphics cards appears to be the real fanboy here ....
  • jobby99 - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    Some people need low cpu and graphics memory only. Thus, they have some insane multi-monitor setups with two independent video cards. Coders for one use at least two monitors. Financial analysts use 3 or 4 for day trading. I just wouldn't assume crossfire is the only use for two or more video cards.
  • batguiide - Sunday, December 9, 2012 - link

    Thanks for these tips! I love the tip about checking where the model is in the store. I just finished reading another article that has some more research based tips about making sure you get the best big ticket items for you, which I also found useful. website:[socanpower,ca]
    Thanks again and happy shopping! Power supply Australia!
  • xerces8 - Thursday, December 20, 2012 - link

    How is 12 sec a fast boot time?
    I have a cheap Medion PC which also has 12 seconds from power switch to boot menu (the one loaded from the boot sector).
    2 seconds is fast. (my previous Asus netbook had such boot/POST times)

    But kudos for actually measuring this usually neglected property.

    PS: For more accurate measuring configure the boot loader to present a menu. Or even beep (should be trivial with GRUB). Also recording the measurement on video should make it easier to read the timings)
  • Nil Einne - Monday, March 25, 2013 - link

    Combining DVI-D with D-sub isn't going to work since the D-sub is supposed to be usable with the HDMI and DVI-D for triple monitor/Eyefinity support. (While some dislike D-sub for these purposes because of the quality loss due to the D-A-D conversion steps it's still fairly popular because many monitors still have D-sub ports but lack Displayport and they can't be bothered spending for an active converter to get HDMI/DVI from the Displayport.)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now