I titled this section final thoughts but left off the word conclusions because I feel that I need to spend longer with WP8 before really drawing any major conclusions - think of this as something of a big preview. At the same time, my first impressions and thoughts are indeed beginning to solidify. For the platform WP8 is absolutely an evolutionary step, rather than another dramatic re-imagining of Microsoft's vision for smartphones. Reimagining the start screen and including another size of live tiles is a nice touch, but the majority of the WP8 interface is the same as it was before. In fact, the most dramatic of changes with WP8 aren't even really visible to end users immediately with the move to the NT based kernel - the fruits of that move will only come later on in the future of the platform with increased hardware portability, better performance, and easier execution for OEMs and silicon vendors. 

Anand made this great observation a while back that each platform was ultimately a reflection of the desktop position of the company behind it. For Google's smartphone platform, that means a full standalone computing environment complete with filesystem, since the search giant lacks its own desktop OS. Android essentially has to compensate for that lack of a real desktop platform by being everything. For iOS, what started as a clear evolution of the iPod has slowly evolved into a standalone platform, but still separate and distinct from OS X. iOS on an iPad for example can exist without a desktop, but doesn't try to supplant one. For Windows Phone, I can't shake the feeling that Microsoft still views the smartphone story as an accessory to everything else - Xbox, Windows 8, and Windows RT. They're three very distinct strategies with subtle differences, but absolutely drive the software decisions that get made each update. 

At the same time WP8 feels like a dramatic update over WP7.5, and I find myself wondering what position Windows Phone would be in had it launched with the NT kernel and with this overall platform. The reality is that WP7 was a time to market play and that at the same time Microsoft was busy porting all of the software to deliver a Windows RT, Windows 8, Windows Phone 8 trifecta. Now that it's upon us hopefully some of the real advantages of this triple play will finally be made clear, and to really be the judge of that I need to actually sit down with all three and experience it. From a feature perspective I just wish that WP8 had tweaked a few more things - fast app switching still is a view with JPEG-compressed screenshots and visible artifacts, there's no VPN support, and messaging needs support for more IM protocols to be truly useful. Application support has gotten better over time on Windows Phone, but now the big drive will be getting existing apps updated to support the new features like live tiles and faster app switching. The big question is how many Windows RT or Windows 8 apps developers will end up porting over to WP8, a process which should be relatively painless given the shared frameworks. 

For what it is, WP8 is a great update. It brings us the framework necessary to finally get modern hardware for Windows Phone, and will launch with what is without a doubt the best hardware from OEM partners in the 8X and Lumia 920. My time with HTC's 8X has been extremely positive - I think they nailed the industrial design, in hand feel, and the right balance of features for a Windows Phone 8. The OS feels smoother than it ever has everywhere I look and in every app I've tried out.  

HTC's Windows Phone 8X
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • maximumGPU - Monday, October 29, 2012 - link

    Thanks for the in depth preview Brian, it's shaping up to be quite the fight between this device and the lumia 920.

    did the relatively low brightness levels cause you any concern during your time with the phone?
  • will792 - Monday, October 29, 2012 - link

    I disagree that Microsoft knows how to implement good thread scheduler. After so many years of potential time to replicate Linux/Unix/Solaris multithreading on Windows servers it is still much worse.
  • mantikos - Monday, October 29, 2012 - link

    BS
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Learn something about schedulers in general and Microsofts implementation then you will see how lousy it is.
  • mantikos - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Oh ok, so because I disagree I don't know any better...gotcha
  • Alucard291 - Monday, November 5, 2012 - link

    Well your argument has been strong and well put. /s

    Sorry but no it wasn't. Saying "BS" and expecting a normal reply?

    Yes you don't seem to know any better.
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Microsoft's thread scheduler has always sucked. Was surprised to see you say different Brian as this is well known.
  • Zink - Monday, October 29, 2012 - link

    Podcast. Sorry to bug you but no one else comes close. The Verge has great coverage of Nexus devices hands on and fancy words etc. but only you guys do podcasts that are good.
  • softdrinkviking - Monday, October 29, 2012 - link

    Hi Brian,
    Thanks for the run down of your few days with WP8.
    Couple things I would love to hear about before the physical launch date!
    How about the interface software? The biggest issue I have with WP7 has been the lack of sync support with outlook.
    Also, Zune sucks. Zune software is buggy and it has abysmal file support.

    And the Marketplace. What about the Marketplace confusion? Are we still supposed to jump around between xbox and live and zune accounts?

    There are a lot of convoluted issues in the WP OS that need to be revised for WP8.
  • karasaj - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Zune has been replaced by the xbox music software etc. I believe.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now