27” panels so far have seemed to do better with display uniformity than smaller displays. The larger size requires a more powerful lighting system and in implementing this it has also been more uniform as well. Here the DS-277W does fairly well, with a couple of darker corners causing a drop but most of the screen staying fairly close to the 200nits we are targeting.

With a black screen the uniformity continues to be decent, with light leakage on one side but the rest of the display keeping close to the same as the center. This was a very good result for the black level in comparison to other displays.

Thankfully this performance does carry over to the color uniformity across the screen. It was established that at 200 nits the DS-277W was a good performer, and it looks like that carried over to the uniformity. The lower-left corner is a little off, but the rest are very close to a dE of 2.0 or below which is good. I will admit to being pretty surprised by how good the results were, but it seems that at 200 nits the DS-277W is a good performer.

LCD Color Uniformity

Color Fidelity and Color Gamut Input Lag, Power Use and Video Use
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • esSJae - Thursday, June 14, 2012 - link

    3 monitors? I use DP for my main monitor on my AMD 6970, DVI for the other 2.
    6 monitors? Better have DP.
  • dertechie - Monday, June 18, 2012 - link

    Anyone using Eyefinity is using either DP or an expensive DP to X converter. Given what those cost, a lot of us just use DP if we picked up the 3rd monitor in the last 3-4 years.

    DP has a lot more support than just Apple. It's cheaper on the transmitter side than DVI or HDMI (and probably VGA by now), so such insignificant players as AMD, NVidia and Intel are dropping legacy connectors as quickly as they can get away with it. Much less penetration on the monitor side of things though.
  • cheinonen - Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - link

    Well, the specs said it had DisplayPort, but really we were trying to do a round up of as many 27", 2560x1440 models as possible. There aren't too many of them out there but this was one of them.
  • Mitch89 - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    I'm also a little confused about this sentence:

    "... the DS-277W is to make a monitor that can work with all of your devices, not just your computer. It has multiple AV inputs (HDMI, Component) for your Blu-ray player or video game systems, and there are integrated speakers for audio from these devices as well. "

    The Dell U2711 has DisplayPort, 2x DVI, VGA, HDMI, Component and even composite connections, and has been out for quite some time (updating previous 27" Dells that had similar connectivity).

    It would seem if multimedia and all-round connectivity is the priority, then the Dell has this thing beat.

    That's without considering Dell's excellent exchange warranty.
  • cheinonen - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    In the conclusion I mention the Dell U2711 and that if you need that connectivity, you should buy the Dell instead. I see no reason to pick the DS-277W over the Dell, or really any other 27", and mention that in the conclusion.
  • damianrobertjones - Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - link

    All these screens really need to start featuring touch
  • Voo - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    Yep stretching your whole body so that you get into touch range of your 30" monitor (you hardly sit 20cm away from one do you?) and then having to deal with all those fingerprints and smears sounds PERFECT! Can't wait for this totally useless feature that will probably double the price of monitors.
  • Jedi2155 - Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - link

    I'm not sure if you're familiar with the Yamasaki Catleap, which is a potentially 120 Hz capable 27" IPS display, but I've been really wanting to get one once the people organizing it, can get some more built. I would love an Anandtech review on it as well. I already plan on getting one as soon as they are available, so I don't need you guys to tell me to get one, but it would be good to get more manufacturers on the 120 Hz PC bandwagon that isn't a 3D TN based display....

    http://120hz.net/content.php
  • anishannayya - Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - link

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but don't you really need to push 120+ FPS to discern the benefits of 120hz? How could you do this when you are already trying to drive the display at 1440p? Furthermore, once you SLI cards, don't you restrict the maximum hz a display can be set at?

    Sure, you could do it when you aren't gaming, but what is the point of that? Making your cursor move more "smoothly"? Does it even matter unless you are gaming?
  • MamiyaOtaru - Wednesday, June 13, 2012 - link

    Not every game is Crysis. There are plenty of games that a modern card can render at 120+ fps

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now