New Inspirons and the Conclusion

I've mentioned briefly that in addition to the flagship Dell XPS One 27 being launched today, Dell is also launching two smaller Inspiron One systems, the One 23 and the One 20 (take a wild guess what the numbers after the "One" represent). These systems honestly just aren't quite as compelling as the massive 27" XPS One 2710, but they're also more affordable.

The Inspiron One 23 peaks at the same top-end CPU as the XPS One 27, but loses the 27" Quad HD display for a standard 1080p display. You also sacrifice the mSATA SSD, and the GPU takes a major hit, being able to top out at only AMD's Radeon HD 7650A with 1GB of DDR3, rendering it essentially unable to handle gaming at the system's native resolution. For these sacrifices, though, you do go down to a starting price of just $749, making it a more affordable option.

Dell's Inspiron One 20 is their ultra-affordable entry level model. CPUs are still Sandy Bridge generation and top out at the Intel Core i3-2120T, with a TDP of just 35W. No dedicated graphics options are available and worse, the only GPU on hand is Intel's horrendously crippled HD 2000, taking any casual gaming beyond Angry Birds completely out of the equation. The 20" screen is also specced at an anemic 1600x900. On the flipside, the Inspiron One 20 starts at only $529, but it's one of those situations where I'm incredibly disappointed to hear these words from a vendor: "We're committed to Intel." There's no reason to commit to anyone, and an entry level all-in-one like this one is the kind of place where AMD's Trinity would thrive.

So with the broader Dell all-in-one line in perspective, I'm of the unusual opinion that the end user should probably go big or go home. The Inspiron One 23 may offer a compelling enough price-performance ratio, but the One 20 is just too cut down. Meanwhile, the XPS One 27 is essentially the One to go for if you're in the market for a Dell all-in-one. Of course, I wish the situation were so cut and dry.

Big Buddha strike me dead for saying this, but the lack of touchscreen support is, in my opinion, a potentially serious liability. Windows 8 isn't that far away, so to not offer a touchscreen on a premium model like this one is extremely shortsighted in my opinion. I also feel like the 65W processors Dell outfits the XPS One with are just too much for the cooling system. Intel's 45W models may take a bigger hit in performance, but they're better suited to builds like this where thermal headroom is at a premium, and I'm not sure most people using an all-in-one really need much more CPU power than what the T-series offers. Then again, with a 27" display taking up plenty of space, it's difficult to believe there wasn't a better way to keep both CPU and GPU temperatures in check, even under load. Laptops have managed far more with even less space after all.

The good news is that Dell has largely fixed the aesthetic and connectivity from the previous generation, and the screen quality is excellent. If you're not going to push the system too hard the XPS One 27 is probably worth considering. Once again, though, thermals prove to be the Achilles' Heel of an all-in-one, and the lack of foresight demonstrated by the omission of a touchscreen should give you pause. This isn't a bad system, but as always, end users should be cognizant of what they're getting into.

User Experience, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • Bownce - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    The Magic Touch touchpad works very well and don't leave prints on the screen.
  • Patanjali - Thursday, November 8, 2012 - link

    There is a version WITH touchscreen.
  • damianrobertjones - Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - link

    No.

    I like to actually change parts without alarms going off within the machine.
  • scottwilkins - Monday, June 18, 2012 - link

    These guys with no clue what good engineering is, and buy Macs? What an idiot.
  • Pc2u - Saturday, September 8, 2012 - link

    Done that, there to slow, dell xps have much better spec much faster and it's designed for windows unlike the mac, no boot amp crud to deal with, updates etc.

    I've got 2 iMacs 27, the only reason I got em was for the resolution, now I can get my hands on a pc all in one with the same screen that's designed for windows (a far better system for an easier, quicker and logical execution for most things) happys days, the iMacs will soon be on eBay, don't like apple never have, some of there products are amazing, but I don't like there policies or OS

    Look out dell here I come
  • cfujii - Monday, September 16, 2013 - link

    Well, Dell fixed the heat issue. I have a Windows 8 version of the XPS One 2710 and it has a great touch screen. It comes with a bluetooth mouse and keyboard (which I replaced with a PCKeyboard unit). The temps are all down from the review. The fans are running about 1200rpm. I got this package for photo editing using Photoshop CS6 and it works great!
    I wouldn't buy a Mac because my background is in IT and the company I just retired from is running Dell. It's been doing well for us so that's why I went to Costco and got the XPS One 2710 for $1600. The new version of the XPS One will have the Haswell processor and the 650M GPU. I was going to wait for the Haswell version but Costco offered $200 off because they are replacing the model I bought with the Haswell version.
  • Blibbax - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    It's worth noting that you could game at exactly half resolution (720p) on this screen and avoid any of the normal issues of LCD scaling.
  • Blibbax - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    Well, I suppose it's 1/4 resolution really, but you get the idea. Each pixel rendered would be exactly 4 pixels on the panel.
  • guidryp - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    Not really. I tried this on my 30" 2560x1600 screen.

    It looks better scaled to 1920x1200 than it does to exactly half (1280x800).

    Apple gets away with this trick because they keep the same size screen and cram in 4 times as many pixels that are too tiny to see.
  • Penti - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    GPU-scaling or the hardware scaling of the screen? Normally I guess you do it on the GPU now days.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now