The Intel Ivy Bridge (Core i7 3770K) Review
by Anand Lal Shimpi & Ryan Smith on April 23, 2012 12:03 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- Intel
- Ivy Bridge
Total War: Shogun 2 is the latest installment of the long-running Total War series of turn based strategy games, and alongside Civilization V is notable for just how many units it can put on a screen at once. Adding to the load is the use of DX11 features such as tessellation and high definition ambient occlusion, which means it can give any GPU a run for its money.
At high quality with Shogun 2's basic DX11 functionality, Ivy Bridge can't quite reach playable framerates. At this point it's closer to the entry-level GT 520 and Radeon HD 5450 than it is AMD's Llano, trailing AMD's iGPU by over 50%.
Turning our settings down to medium, and thereby reverting to DX10 functionality, Ivy Bridge picks up some performance. 26fps still isn't good enough to reach the 30fps mark, but at the same time it represents a remarkable improvement for Intel. Ivy Bridge is 61% faster than Sandy Bridge here, which is far greater than the theoretical performance difference between the two GPUs. Nevertheless Ivy Bridge still trails Llano by 55%, keeping Ivy Bridge decidedly in the entry level class of GPUs.
What's interesting here is that this is the first test in our suite that is shader intensive at even lower settings. On paper Ivy Bridge has far more memory bandwidth than GPUs like the GT 520, but only roughly the same amount of shader performance. The fact that the two GPUs are nearly tied is a stark reminder of this fact. Ivy Bridge greatly improves on Sandy Bridge, but it still has quite some distance to go to catch Llano in shader-bound scenarios.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
173 Comments
View All Comments
jmcb - Saturday, May 12, 2012 - link
I was thinking the exact same thing.I waited long to jump on the dual core bandwagon, 2008 with a C2D 8400. I havent jumped on the quad core wagon yet. Was waiting for them to run cooler.
This seems like a good time to make the jump.
CeriseCogburn - Friday, June 1, 2012 - link
I'm going to get rid of my 2500K @ 4.8GHz , because it's HD3000 just isn't doing it for BF3,and I'm going Trinity man !
See me and my amd apu on the gaming servers !
a. totally wanna be cool amd fan
b. fantasy boy with lunch money from mommie in pocket
c. bonkers
d. all the above
p05esto - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
Yea, but WHEN can I buy one? Forgive me if I missed that all important detail. My desktop is 2.5 yrs old and am ready to upgrade here. Show me where to buy, lol.Catalina588 - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
OEM boxes arrive April 29th. I expect NewEgg will have parts shortly thereafter.tiki037 - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - link
+1I thought the April 23 launch date meant that was when we would be able to buy one.
Tommyv2 - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
Why no benchmarks against a 2700K, you know - a real platform comparison? I'm guessing it's exactly the same performance?Anand Lal Shimpi - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
Working on testing the 2700K now - didn't have one at the time that the CPU tests were conducted, the difference is small as you can guess, will add results to bench as they are completed.Take care,
Anand
Ratman6161 - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
...but really, they already have large quantities of benchmarks of the 2600K and the difference between that and 2700K is going to be relatively meaningless...my guess, not worth the trouble of running the whole suite of benchmarks on it. To my knowledge, the only difference is 100 MHz of clock speed, right?deadsix - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
Any chance Anand that we get a 35W Quad Core processor for laptops like the Macbook Pro 13"Kristian Vättö - Monday, April 23, 2012 - link
There is i7-3612QM which is a 35W 2.1GHz quad core. Whether Apple uses it is another question, though.http://www.anandtech.com/show/5772/mobile-ivy-brid...