DiRT 3

For racing games our racer of choice continues to be DiRT, which is now in its 3rd iteration. Codemasters uses the same EGO engine between its DiRT, F1, and GRID series, so the performance of EGO has been relevant for a number of racing games over the years.

DiRT 3 - 2560x1600 - DX11 Ultra Quality + 4xAA

DiRT 3 - 1920x1200 - DX11 Ultra Quality + 4xAA

DiRT 3 - 1680x1050 - DX11 Ultra Quality + 4xAA

First it loses, then it ties, and then it starts to win.

After a very poor start in Crysis NVIDIA has finally taken a clear lead in a game. DiRT 3 has historically favored NVIDIA’s video cards so this isn’t wholly surprising, but it’s our first proof that the GTX 680 can beat the 7970, with the GTX 680 taking a respectable 6% lead at 2560. Interestingly enough the lead increases as we drop down in resolution, which is something we have also seen with past Radeon and GeForce cards. It looks like Fermi’s trait of dropping off in performance more rapidly with resolution than GCN has carried over to the GTX 680.

In any case, compared to the GTX 580 this is another good showing for the GTX 680. The 680’s lead on the 580 is a rather consistent 36-38%.

DiRT 3 - Minimum Frame Rate - 2560x1600

DiRT 3 - Minimum Frame Rate - 1920x1200

DiRT 3 - Minimum Frame Rate - 1680x1050

The minimum framerates reflect what we’ve seen with the averages; the GTX 680 has a slight lead on the 7970 at 2560, while it beats the GTX 580 by over 30%.

Metro 2033 Total War: Shogun 2
Comments Locked

404 Comments

View All Comments

  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Wait the boost speed is 1110 vs 1005 right? So 10% faster in shader performance, which will = about 5% in benchmarking performance in the best case.

    Nothing to see here move along.
  • Janooo - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Well, 7970@1.1GHz beats plain 680.
  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Who cares, I wan't to know what the card comes shipped as. Thats what matters, anything extra you get out of that is exactly that, extra. What comes out of the box, thats what they are promising.
  • BoFox - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    Wait, you mean that HD 7970 needs to be overclocked by more than 20% in order to beat plain 680?

    How about overclocking that 680 by 15% like most review sites show is possible?

    Then the 7970 would need to be overclocked by an impossible 35% in order to beat a 680 overclocked by 15%.

    That was a nice try, Janooo!
  • Janooo - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    It seems you missed the point.
    Whatever speed 680 has 7970 can match it. These cards are equal in this regard.
    When they have the same clock speed then it looks like 7970 is faster.
    Look for AMD to release a faster card soon.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    We will have to subtract some mhz from the 7970 for having a larger core with more die space to make it fair, so transistor for transistor Kepler wins big.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    Plus were going to have to subtract more from The Heatie because it cheats on ram size too.
    Thanks Janooo you have great ideas.
  • BoFox - Monday, March 26, 2012 - link

    Ok, if I go by your analogy and say that overclocking GTX 580 to the same speed as HD 6970 (880 MHz) makes both cards "equal in this regard."

    When they have the same clock speed then it looks like GTX 580 is faster.

    Look for Nvidia to release a faster card soon ultilizing that 8-pin PCI-E connector on the PCB (which it did not need in order to beat HD 7970 overclocked or not).
  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link

    680 has made 1,900mhz and makes well over 1,280 ouit of box reference...
  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Why, thats how it is setup stock. That is how EVERY SINGLE CARD will come.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now