Overclocking

Though XFX does not provide any overclocking tools for the BEDD, the card itself is advertised as an overclocking card to an extent. The use of the AMD PCB and a similarly high performing cooler means that overclocking results shouldn’t be much better or much worse than reference cards, but given how much potential we’re seeing out of the 7970 this is not a bad thing.

Even with XFX’s factory overclock the BEDD features the same 1125MHz overdrive limit as all current 7970 cards, so you have 125MHz (~11%) to play with within Overdrive. Based on our experience this is right at the edge of what’s this card is capable of – after pushing the card to 1150MHz through MSI’s Afterburner software we found that our sample peaked at 1125MHz anyhow, as anything beyond that impacted stability and caused artifacts. Meanwhile we were able to push our memory to 6.3GHz, as beyond that point performance plateaued as the need for error correction nullified our gains.

Our final clocks were 1125MHz core and 6.3GHz memory, representing a 21% core and 14% memory overclock over the reference 7970, or an 11% core and 11% memory overclock over XFX’s factory overclock. As the BEDD uses an AMD PCB it should be possible to use compatible voltage tweaking software to push it further, but for the time being we’re limiting ourselves to what the 7970 can do on stock voltage as the AMD PCB isn’t particularly overbuilt for overvolting. On that note we did increase our PowerTune limit to +20% (300W) in order to ensure PowerTune didn’t throttle our overclocked BEDD, though there appears to be headroom to spare in at least some of our games.

Radeon HD 7970 Overclocking
  Radeon HD 7970 Stock XFX Radeon HD 7970 BEDD XFX Radeon HD 7970 BEDD Overclock
Core Clock 925MHz 1000MHz 1125MHz
Memory Clock 1.375GHz (5.5GHz effective) GDDR5 1.425GHz (5.7GHz effective) GDDR5 1.575GHz (6.3GHz effective) GDDR5
Voltage 1.17v 1.17v 1.17v
PowerTune 250W 250W 300W

The end result of a further 11% overclock to both the GPU and memory clock results in a very consistent 11% performance increase across the board. From Crysis to Battlefield 3 everything jumps up by 11%, and the combination of the two overclocks means that our overclocked BEDD leaves just about every other single-GPU video card in the dust. Even the dual-GPU 6990 and GTX 590 have their leads seriously eroded, and in a few cases the overclocked BEDD will pull ahead of the GTX 590 in games that AMD does particularly well in. If the reference 7970 and BEDD didn’t impress you, certainly this will.

So what’s the tradeoff for this overclock? It’s actually very little. Even with our increased PowerTune limit – which doesn’t increase the power consumption, just the potential for power consumption – power consumption under Metro only rises 26W, and at least some of this will be additional work on the CPU in response to the relaxed GPU bottleneck. OCCT looks worse, but again this has more to do with the PowerTune limit than the overclock.

The fact that this overclock has had a minimal impact on the power consumption of our BEDD is reinforced by our temperature and noise data. Under Metro the overclocked BEDD gets 1C warmer and 2dB louder versus its factory clocks, which is a very small increase given the 11% overclock. So long as we don’t touch the core voltage for the BEDD (or any other 7970), the power tradeoff for overclocking is nearly non-existent, which is fantastic news given that we’ve just driven a 7970 21% over AMD’s reference clocks on reference voltage.

Compute Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

93 Comments

View All Comments

  • wifiwolf - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link

    I would assume it's a nice fit for you too as you tend to persist.
  • Morg. - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link

    Precisely.

    Information : good

    Information + Information about the Information : better

    The content presented here is not worthless, one just has to know what it is and how it is limited (i.e. anandtech needs funding, they can't do all benchmarks themselves, etc.)
  • AssBall - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link

    Trolls like you?

    Not informative.

    Not factual.

    Not worth reading.
  • MrBunny - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    point made. formulation could be more along the lines that this cooling solution(though being louder at idle but cooler) is nicely executed being the card is overclocked and there by beating the reference design cooler easily in temps and noise.

    the only thing that they need to fix is the the idle fan pwm so it can be silent at idle aswell.

    @Njoy i think he read it just right.
  • Morg. - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link

    Just edit the bios manually when tools are available and you can change the curve from the original (which XFX didn't bother to modify for some reason .. they simply had to lower the first point in the curve to 15% or something - unless as I said there was a minimum voltage for the fans to start -- )
  • R3MF - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    how is GCN an architecture targetted at compute tasks when it is no more capable of DP FP than the VLIW4, in that it is still only capable of doing DP tasks at 1/4 speed of SP?

    or, is the 1/4 only a function of crippled consumer drivers, whereas professional products will see perhaps 1/2 for DP FP?
  • Morg. - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    Probably the latter.

    All in all, GCN is exactly like Fermi (which is also like an older design) and the performance characteristics should be very close in the end - where it matters (i.e. not gamer products).
  • R3MF - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    would be a shame if true, especially when paying $549 for the hardware!
  • Morg. - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link

    Are you really doing GPU accelerated computing ??
  • R3MF - Wednesday, January 11, 2012 - link

    me? no.

    but it is going to become a very mainstream thing for performance hungry applications, and i always dislike buying artificially disabled products.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now