The Technical Side Of Windows 8

As we mentioned in the opening of this article, the single biggest addition to Windows 8 coming from Windows 7 will be Metro. Microsoft’s last major overhaul of Windows’ underpinnings was Windows Vista, and like Windows 7 before it, Microsoft is not looking to significantly alter the operation of the Windows kernel or related systems for Windows 8. With that said this doesn’t mean that there aren’t any technical changes that will ship with Windows 8.

Fundamentally Microsoft wants to keep the system requirements for Windows 8 the same as Windows 7, which means it needs to run (with varying definitions of “smoothly”) on a 1GHz CPU paired with 1GB of RAM and a DX9 class GPU. Realistically as their published requirements stand there is one difference from Windows 7: Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM). Windows 7 would work with older XPDM drivers (albeit without any of the benefits of WDDM), however Windows 8 specifically mentions WDDM as a requirement. This makes sense given the greater reliance on the GPU for Metro, but it also means there are going to be some machines out there using very early DX9 GPUs (e.g. Intel GMA 900) that won’t be able to run Windows 8 due to a lack of video drivers.

In any case the addition of ARM into the mix will be sure to spice things up., While Microsoft is optimizing Windows 8 to run on ARM CPUs there’s a vast range of ARM CPUs, and this is the full version of Windows. Microsoft’s current system requirements are easily discernable as x86 based, and we’d expect the ARM requirements to be fairly high to keep pace. Give the launch of quad core ARM SoCs later this year, it’s likely that will be a popular pairing with Windows 8 when it launches.

On a final note about system requirements, while Microsoft isn’t talking about specific versions of Windows 8 at this time, they’ve made it clear that x86 will live on for at least one more generation in order to fulfill their desire to have Windows 8 run on everything Windows 7 ran on. So x86 versions of Windows should be expected.

Moving on, as this was a press session as opposed to a technical session, Microsoft was a bit light on the details. We’re expecting quite a bit more in the next couple of days, but for the moment we’ve only been briefed on a few user-facing technologies that are new to Windows 8.

On the hardcore side of things, Microsoft has added a few tricks to Windows in order to keep memory usage from growing and to make the OS better suited for tablets. On the memory side they have added Page Combining, which will combine duplicate memory pages into a single page. This is primarily to reduce the overhead from multiple applications all having copies of the same shared resource by having applications outright share that resource’s memory pages. Page Combining will primarily be a tool for reclaiming memory when memory usage is approaching critical levels.

For making the OS better suited for tablet hardware, Microsoft has focused on small changes that can help the hardware sleep longer and wake up less often. Coalescing system timers and a dynamic tick mechanism are two such features that will be coming to Windows 8 (unfortunately we don’t have any more details on their function at this time). Meanwhile Metro will play a big part in making Windows tablet friendly, as Metro applications will be designed from the start to be able to handle phone/tablet style process management. This is to say that discarded applications will continue to stay open as a background application, having all of their memory pages intact but unable to schedule CPU time so long as they’re a background application. They’ll remain in this state until the OS decides to evict them, at which point they need to be able to gracefully shut down and resume when the user re-launches the application. Internally Microsoft calls this freezing and rehydrating an application.

The Windows Store The Technical Side Of Windows 8: Cont
Comments Locked

235 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - link

    If you think the only difference between Win95 and Win7 is the UI and "convenience functionality" (and I love how make this sound like a bad thing), then you are sorely mistaken.
  • Exodite - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - link

    For the end user there's no discernible differences aside from those noted.

    Sure, we've gotten higher versions of APIs such as DirectX or whatever but in the end that matters very little.
  • UMADBRO - Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - link

    Have fun with that. Let us all know what happens when you try and even get that outdated, abandoned POS online, much less being able to do anything even remotely useful, other then playing old, shitty games.
  • Exodite - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - link

    I used my '92 Amiga as my primary computer until '04, at which point I built my first Wintel machine - mainly due to gaming.

    The Amiga still works, were connected to the Internet with a 10Mbit PCMCIA Ethernet adapter, had an excellent browser for the time, and still offers a better desktop experience than any version of Windows.

    I realize most people familiar with the platform only ever used A500's with Kickstart 1.2 or 1.3 and never actually saw the OS due to using it as gaming console. That's unfortunate, as AmigaOS 3.x remains unmatched in performance, simplicity, power and convenience when put up against any modern desktop OS.
  • UMADBRO - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - link

    That must have been interesting. Ill admit, I also use older stuff for specific things, like my old P4 box running Win98SE for DOS and older Windows games. But I also realize that its usefulness is limited, at best. Eventually we all need to move on. Anyway, sorry for the hostility. The overall tone in these messages when I was reading last night just annoyed me to no end. The majority of people have made up their mind before even trying things out. I cant stand close minded people like that.
  • Exodite - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - link

    No offense taken, I do see your point.

    For me personally I suppose the disappointment is two-fold;

    The distinct lack of technical innovation, which I consider current iterations of Windows to be in desperate need of, and the hodge-podge UI design.

    The latter will hopefully improve until release at least.

    I'm personally not a fan of metro in any way, though for WP7 devices I have no problem acknowledging that it's a very functional design with it's own distinctive style.

    Unfortunately I can't see an upside to its introduction on the desktop. Someone likened it to a 'consoleization' of the desktop and I can only think about how how apt that statement is.

    Still, final judgment must be reserved for the release version.
  • Booster - Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - link

    Looks like another 9 years on Windows 7 to me. There's no way I'm ever installing this crap.
  • Booster - Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - link

    I mean, how can you even multitask on this ridiculous garbage? I normally have like 10 browser windows open, 4-5 word and excel docs, plus a handful of Explorer windows. And I need to switch between all this really fast, copy and paste and so on. What am I supposed to do with this?!
  • dagamer34 - Tuesday, September 13, 2011 - link

    Stick to the normal desktop?
  • ph0tek - Wednesday, September 14, 2011 - link

    LOL. Exactly. Some of these people commenting are so thick i's truly amazing.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now