Test Setup

Processor Intel Core i5 2500K ES
4 cores, 4 threads, 6MB L3
Motherboards Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3 ($170)
Cooling Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme with one 120MM fan
Power Supply Silverstone 1000W Silver (Power Testing)
OCZ ZX Series 1250w 80 PLUS Gold
Memory Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-2000MHz 9-11-9-27 2x4GB - 1.65v
Memory Settings DDR3-1333MHz - 9-9-9-24 1T at 1.65v
Video Cards XFX HD 5850 1GB
Video Drivers Catalyst 10.12
Hard Drive OCZ Vertex 3 240GB
Optical Drive Samsung SH-S223Q
Case Dimastech Bench Table
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit
SATA Testing OCZ Vertex 3 240GB
Micron C300
USB 2/3 Testing Patriot 64GB SuperSonic USB 3.0

Before we go any further, I’d like to take the time to thank OCZ for making this review as well as future reviews possible – OCZ provided a ZX series 1250w Gold rated PSU (retails at $240) and a Vertex 3 240GB SSD (retails at $560).

Comparison to Previous Results

Where applicable, the results in this review are directly compared to the following chipsets and boards which we have reviewed previously:

P67 H67 Z68 A75
ASRock P67 Extreme4 ECS H67H2-M ASUS P8Z68-V Pro ASRock A75 Extreme6
ASUS P8P67 Pro Gigabyte H67MA-UD2H    
Gigabyte P67A-UD4 ASRock H67M-GE/HT    
ECS P67H2-A2      
ASRock P67 Extreme6      
MSI P67A-GD65      

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system as a whole with a wall meter connected to the power supply, while in a dual GPU configuration.  This method allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency.  These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

 Power Consumption - iGPU Mode

As this is my first review for AnandTech, Ian hasn't run any tests using his OCZ 1250W power supply yet, making any tests he has previously done with an older power supply not comparable to this motherboard.

CPU Temperatures

 CPU Temperatures

In a similar situation, Ian and I have different cooling setups (he is using a H50, I'm using a TRUE) for now, so I cannot compare these results to others and draw justifiable conclusions.

 

BIOS and Overclocking System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brutus1234 - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    I bought one of these from Newegg a couple weeks ago and I'm very happy with it.

    2600K with a 45x multiplier for 4.5GHz
    GSKill RipSaw DDR3 ( 4 Gig ) - system recognizes memory as 2133 with enhanced profile
    H70 Corsair Water Cooler

    Runs great, Have not touched voltage - it's still all stock.

    I've stressed tested it, running some h264 encodes, getting nearly 100% utilization on the CPU for 6hrs and never a hiccup. Temp rarely cracks 50C on the CPU. Very happy with this build

    Only thing I have issues with is the Virtu Softare. It recognizes the board but I thought I was getting a licence to use it, and all I can get is a demo mode.
  • Patrick Wolf - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    So they implement TouchBIOS but not a GUI? That's just being lazy. FFS, even Biostar has a GUI. Then of course there's the boot loop issue that wasted a lot of my time.
    http://www.overclock.net/intel-motherboards/103472...
  • 789427 - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    GUI for bios is *really* a waste of time. Imagine having to connect a keyboard AND a mouse to fix the machine when it breaks...

    That's like finding a use for a mouse in DR Dos 6.0

    Awesome motherboard... lack of fan control shouldn't be too problematic.

    Just had a thought though.... if CPUs were delivered in larger packages with the connectors situated off-die, with a vertical arrangement it would be possible to cool both sides of the die at once in a sandwich style cooler.

    Twice the surface area to cool means that we'd be in overclocking heaven!

    Now we just need Intel to decide to change the sockets again!
  • 86waterpumper - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    I agree with EnzoFX. If the bios does not cause a boot time slowdown that is pretty well a non issue. However, this day and age lack of fan control in the bios is more than stupid. More and more you are going to see a move to more efficient and power saving features. There is no point in a cpu clocking down and powergating and idling if the fan is going to blast on along like a jet. This is especially true for htpc use which alot are going to use the sandy bridge z68 for. Speaking of that, gigabyte is the one that actually has a z68 board out without a video out on the board at all right? What are they smoking these days :P
  • The0ne - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    "Based on the benchmarks and performance figures seen in this review, it shows that you do not have to spend big amounts of money on a motherboard to get on to the Z68 platform. A motherboard that could arguably be aimed at the budget end of the spectrum has performed well "

    This would fit my needs perfectly. Just wondering why with the comment above it's not a "pick" from you/Anandtech? What's lacking to make it so?
  • jigglywiggly - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    U GRAMMAR FARTS
    STFU
    READ THE ARTICLE FOR THE INFO
  • fb39ca4 - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    How is $170 a budget motherboard? This is mid range territory.
  • ratbert1 - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    Enjoying your baptism by fire? I was going to post about the grammar, but it seems to have all be said.
  • Mr Alpha - Monday, July 11, 2011 - link

    Why not run CDM in 0xFF fill mode? Sure, the perfectly compressible data is unrealistic, but it would largely take the flash out of the equation making the benchmark purely about the interface. And when benchmarking a motherboard is it not the limits of the interfaces it provides that really matter?
  • nemitech - Tuesday, July 12, 2011 - link

    The test does;t say what version of Lucid was used on the Gigabyte MB vs the Asus one. a new version was released yesterday on the Gigabyte site:
    http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx...

    I can't see any hardware reason that the Gigabyte should be slower than the Asus. Maybe there is a BIOS or Lucid driver update that brings the performance back in par. that is the probelm with reviews, issues are rarely revisited or updated leaving a bad opinion about a product.

    This is defiantly a budget MB - I got mine for $105 (!) after $15 rebate, at microcenter this past weekend, with a 2500k for $180. What a bargain. :-)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now