Round 4 - Cameras

The Nook doesn’t have a camera, so Samsung wins by default. With that said, I never missed having cameras on the Nook while I had it. I understand the allure of having a front facing camera from the videoconferencing point of things, but I never figured out why I would need a rear facing camera on a tablet. I’m not going to complain that they have them, but just given the usage model of tablets, I’m not sure how often most people use the rear facing cameras. Usually with tablets, you’re just sitting somewhere, either at home or somewhere like a Starbucks or a library, and generally you don’t need to take pictures of stuff there. It’s like putting an outward facing webcam on a notebook - sure, I’m sure someone somewhere would find a use for it, but for a vast majority of users, what’s the point? It’s why the rotating webcams on laptops died out long ago; it was a part that had little to no usage model. 

Maybe I’m weird, but I’m legitimately curious for those people that have iPad 2s or any of the other tablets. How often have you guys ended up using the rear facing cameras?
 
 
Anyways, back to the Samsung’s cameras, our findings remain pretty similar to before. Passable still quality; with enough natural light, you will get solid Facebook quality pictures. With less light, you’re going to regret even trying to take a picture. Video turns out okay, but there’s no HD recording like there is on the Galaxy S devices. I kind of wish Samsung had used the same camera module as the handsets, but on a lower-end device this, I can understand why they didn’t. 

AnandTech - Samsung Galaxy Tab Video Sample

Round 3 - Display Round 5 - Battery Life
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pessimism - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    I'd LOVE to see a roundup review of all the offshore generic pad clones you listed off at the start of the article.
  • VivekGowri - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Yeah, so would I, but I'm not going to hold my breath for review units - I'm still waiting on eLocity, Archos, and NotionInk.
  • peldor - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    My wife uses the rear-camera on her 3G Galaxy Tab all the time for facebook posts (and as you note, it's good enough for that).

    The $200 Tab at Verizon with a $20 data plan (1GB/mo I think) was the cheapest way to get her an Android device with mobile service. She loves it.

    Also note, Kindle slipcases are a very good fit for the Tab.
  • cgalyon - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    I've always been a fan of the Nook Color, it's just a great little device (largely thanks to the hacking of it). One little thing that I think makes a large difference (and isn't mentioned in the review) is the distance from the screen to the glass. The Nook Color's screen is very close to the glass (like on the Palm Pre). This just has a nicer feel to it, but it's a subtle difference.

    That said, I ended up getting a Galaxy Tab 3G (refurb at $260). Seems like an unbeatable deal.
  • smolten - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    http://www.woot.com/

    The price difference is GONE! You can get a refurbed Galaxy Tab off of WOOT today only for 259.99!

    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" 16GB Android Tablet - Wi-Fi + 3G
    $259.99

    * + $5 shipping

    Condition:
    Refurbished
    Product:
    1 Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" 16GB Android 2.2, Wi-Fi + 3G (Sprint), microSD, BT, GPS, 3.0 & 1.3MP Cams
  • micksh - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    in order to install CM7 to eMMC. So the process of installing a custom ROM a bit more complicated but still doable.
  • vld - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Why wouldn't you include the Archos 101 Internet Tablet in the <$300 collection?
  • smolten - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Archos 101 is completely garbage! My screen was damaged in one week after I got it. The resolution is horrible as well. The replacement device I got was brand new and when you clicked on the screen it would register someplace else. Avoid the Archos
    its cheap and horrible.

    ,
  • skyhawk21 - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Curious why the author of this article did not include an audio section to compare whichever version of the Samsung Galaxy Tab to the Barnes & Noble Nook Color?
    Nook Color:
    * Mono speaker installed into back of Nook Color tablet faces backward
    * Volume at loudest is mediocre at best
    * For some reason audio channels are reversed through the stock firmware when using headphones
    * Headphone port has noticeable static in background even with audio muted
    * Headphone port not solid and has trouble inserting a 3.5mm cable

    Galaxy Tab:
    * Stereo speakers installed into bottom of tablet face downward
    * Volume at loudest is noticeable
    * Audio channels are correct
    * Headphone port has no static present in background when audio is muted
    * Headphone port is solid and handles 3.5mm cables firmly

    - Also I do believe the original galaxy tab natively will play 720p videos smoothly and has a full complete working android market. You can play 1080p videos with third party android software

    - Even with a rooted nook color the market has issues, applications have issues due to not finding a hardware GPS built in so those apps will not load. Also battery drain and sleep issues are present with the different third party firmwares available. Nook color has many issues with using 802.11 N mode WIFI with many routers.

    - Original Galaxy Tab stock do not have any of these issues present!

    I did not see this information in the article so I thought I would post it!
  • VivekGowri - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    I never had any issues with the headphone jack on the Nook, though I agree the speaker is terrible. Also, I found Market to work pretty well on the Nook...all of the apps I tried worked fine, but I didn't do much as far as location-centric apps because I knew there wasn't GPS on the device.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now