We reviewed the performance of the Vision 3D from the standpoint of a HTPC, and it has turned out to be the best SFF HTPC we have ever reviewed, hands down. For anyone in the market for a high end HTPC with a small form factor and low power consumption, the Vision 3D is the perfect choice. Its feature set makes it one of the most future proof PCs to have ever graced our doors.

Within a span of two years, ASRock has managed to get in three different systems catering to the entry level, mainstream (mid-range) and high end small form factor HTPC space respectively. The competition in this space is heating up, with the Dell Zino 410 HTPC slated to ship around the same time as the Vision 3D. However, by catering to consumers on the leading edge (3D Blu-Ray and HDMI 1.4a), ASRock is able to justify the premium pricing that they are demanding for the Vision 3D.

3D technology is yet to become mainstream for many of us at AnandTech, and we are secretly hoping that glasses-free 3D tech comes in before the present tech is able to go mainstream. However, the marketing push by nVidia and other consumer electronic companies, it looks like the present 3D technology is here to stay. But, this is again a story for another article on another day. So, let us wrap up this review with the pros and cons of the Vision 3D:

Pros

  • Quantum leap in gaming performance and very small power penalty (under normal usage) over the mid-range Core 100
  • The three USB 3.0 ports get maximum performance out of external hard disks
  • Perfect 3D Blu-Ray playback with HD audio bitstreaming and GPU MVC decode acceleration using bundled PowerDVD OEM version
  • Improved HTPC metrics when compared with the Core 100 or Ion based nettops
  • Customers without fancy A/V receivers still get the advantage of the THX Studio Pro certification
  • Powerful and stable 300 Mbps Wireless-N networking capable of streaming high bitrate videos.
  • Improved industrial design makes sure that the unit blends well in most A/V setups.
  • Bundled MCE remote has good build quality can control almost all media playback programs
  • Easy overclocking for both CPU and GPU from within Windows
  • Perfect wake-up from sleep / shutdown using the MCE remote (No different from using a dedicated media streamer like the WDTV Live)

Cons

  • HM55 chipset limitations doesn't allow for full performance from USB 3.0 ports when using external SSDs, and the 3rd USB 3.0 port is an overkill for a SFF HTPC
  • No PCI-E expansion slots inside, ruling out the possibility of an internal TV tuner
  • Windows 7 OS is not bundled
  • Premium pricing ($999 definitely places it beyond the impulse buy category)

We would have liked to present the Vision 3D with one of our first awards in the HTPC space. Unfortunately, the absence of any meaningful competition in the SFF HTPC space for the features enabled by this unit makes it a difficult proposition. That said, we continue to be impressed by ASRock's rapid strides in the industry and look forward to more exciting products from them in the coming months.

HTPC Performance : Noise, Power Consumption and Miscellaneous Concerns
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • ganeshts - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    Thanks, fixed :)
  • nitrousoxide - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    A Seagate Barracuda Momentus XT 500GB would do much better job than WD Scorpio Black.
  • LtGoonRush - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    A Seagate Momentus XT 500GB would cost nearly twice as much as the WD Scorpio Black 500GB ($130 vs $75 at retail), and the performance difference is rather unimpressive. In the tests where the Seagate can make use of its SLC cache it can take the lead, but in most tests the Scorpio Black is faster, especially when seek times or write performance come into play, since those are Seagate's major weaknesses.
  • BansheeX - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    Cool box but LOL at the THX logo being slapped on it. They used to put that on heavily compressed DVD mixes, not all of them good either. Consumers don't care anymore.
  • ganeshts - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    Personally, I don't care too much about the THX either :) If you are using HDMI for audio, it doesn't even appear in the picture.

    The internal audio codec is advertised with THX, so the HTPC using it gets the additional marketing point too :)
  • tobrien - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    you guys did such an excellent job with this review! thanks for all the hard work and effort you guys put in!
  • Shiitaki - Sunday, October 3, 2010 - link

    I'm not seeing the value here. A thousand dollars to stream content, and play blurays? One of the previous replies you stated that there was no native bluray support for the mac mini, true. And there is for a machine running windows? Tacking on Cyberlink is not native support.

    That is way too much hardware for what it does, which illustrates how badly Windows is for a platform. You could do much better with less hardware. Which is the real problem with a htpc, the software, the operating system, and various codecs, and getting it to all work together. Too much complexity. Most of the processor is wasted on layers of software instead of doing actual work. Most of the effort is expended to compensate for lazy and inadequate programming, as well as DRM.

    I understand the concept, I had a htpc for a couple of years, but after the frustration of trying to get surround sound to work in Cyberlink for Blurays, and the tech support to keep Windows working, I gave up. In fact it was specifically windows deciding to rebuild my music library from scratch every time I opened media center to play music. I want an appliance on the other end of the remote, having to search forums and break out a mouse and keyboard to trouble shoot something that worked the day before just fine should not be step two after pressing the power button.

    In the the article, there is no details as to how much or little work it took to make the software environment to work. Did settings hold, did you have to do reconfigurations, update drivers, load codecs? I seriously doubt it worked out of the box. Working out of the box is the great failure of the pc industry. On the video quality you are hedging, saying that video quality will get better with driver updates? So it's not finished eh? That's the sad reality with the computer industry in general, nothing ships as a finished product.

    The only thing this device seems to offer are endless possibilities to reward owners with a sense of accomplishment having solved issues preventing operations promised by the vendor. You can buy a nice bluray player, wd live, and still have 700 dollars for something else.

    The real news is if you took it out of the box, plugged everything in, did a setup once, and spent the rest of the time using it. No drivers, patches, settings that reset themselves, or promises of a future update for something to work So what did it take to make it work like it's supposed to, what issues does it have? Did you listen to two channel, or full surround? How many error messages did you have to deal with?
  • ganeshts - Monday, October 4, 2010 - link

    What you are looking for is a player like the upcoming Netgear NTV550. That would put it in the media streamer section. That would be like $700 cheaper than the Vision 3D, but, with the NTV choice, you are at the mercy of Netgear for firmware updates in case something you want doesn't work, and it also doesn't support 3D -- which is what this product is targeted towards.. For the Vision 3D running Windows, you have a number of open source developers who can enable core features like HD audio bitstreaming etc. -- Try getting open source devs to get those sort of features working on a SoC based device.

    The fact with the HTPC scene is that you do have to do some setup of sorts and deal with error messages and what no. However, sometimes, slapping on the latest XBMC build solves most problems. Our test suite is designed to give problems to various softwares, so deriding drivers / softwares on the basis of the difficulty in getting it to work is not the purpose of the review.
  • ggathagan - Monday, October 4, 2010 - link

    Everything you state is true but, unfortunately, that can be said of computers in general. It's not limited to HTPC.

    You're also missing one of the major points of the HTPC: Its ability as a computer.
    You don't get that from a standalone device.

    You don't specify what version of MCE you were using, but if you weren't using the Windows 7 version it's not really a valid arguement.
    I never tried the Vista version, but the Win 7 version has certainly come a looong way from the XP version.
    And if you happen to be someone on a budget that wants to do it all with a single device, the price of the ASRock system is pretty attractive, even after adding the cost of the OS, monitor and BD software.
  • Hrel - Monday, October 4, 2010 - link

    Pretty sure the hybrid Seagate Momentus XT is the fastest 2.5" drive they could have chosen. To all the other people talking about this egregious error, WD and Seagate are the only mechanical disk hard drive manufacturer's even worth looking at.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now