ASUS VG236H 23-inch 3D Display Review: 120Hz is the Future
by Brian Klug on August 7, 2010 2:48 AM ESTPower Consumption
The ASUS VG236H specifications stipulate power use of under 60 watts in typical circumstances. At maximum draw, we measured 47 watts.
We test display power consumption using a Kill-A-Watt EZ in line with the display power cable, and measure at maximum and minimum brightness while displaying solid white.
The VG236H finished within this 60 watt upper limit, drawing a maximum of 47 watts at maximum brightness, and 25 with the display at its lowest brightness. Granted, it’s only 23”, but still efficient results.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
121 Comments
View All Comments
ganeshts - Saturday, August 7, 2010 - link
True, but the fact of life is that more monitors support HDMI compared to DisplayPort.Also, most upcoming GPUs claim HDMI 1.4a support, but DisplayPort 1.2 is not seen (that is necessary for 3D).
All 3D TVs use HDMI 1.4. So, if there is one interface to do the job for both TV and monitor, I will gladly take it :)
Pozz - Saturday, August 7, 2010 - link
Most Importantly, why component instead of vga/another hdmi input? mehmbtgood - Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - link
i like mbt alotwww.mbt-usa.com
BladeVenom - Saturday, August 7, 2010 - link
As much as that monitor is going to cost, it's just not worth it when they skimp on the connections.I'm not going to buy another monitor without Displayport.
DarkUltra - Sunday, August 8, 2010 - link
Me too. DisplayPort is needed if we want 120hz in anything higher than 1920x1200. Dual-link dvi maxes out at 1310p @ 120hz I think. 2560x1600x120x24 = 11.8Gbps and displayport can do 17.28Gbps. Fonts look real nice in 135dpi.medi01 - Saturday, August 7, 2010 - link
I rather wish I could buy new 4:3 monitor...softdrinkviking - Sunday, August 8, 2010 - link
http://www.eizo.com/global/products/flexscan/index...you can
mino - Tuesday, August 10, 2010 - link
Check the price ... not everybody who need a screen for work is a DTP/CAD/media professional.softdrinkviking - Saturday, October 23, 2010 - link
true. it's pricey, but they look fantastic and it won't need replacing for a good, long time.when you want an older tech that has become a specialty item, you have to expect it to be more expensive, that's life.
mino - Tuesday, August 10, 2010 - link
Yeah, tell me about it.Needed 1600x1200 (even 1600x1600 would be welcome) had to go for 1920 and got luxky a reasonable 1920x1080 are still made ...
Most is just 16:9 useless junk.