Battery Life Testing

Battery life on the KIN was a shocker. It was superb.

Both of the KIN not only delivered above average call times of around 6 hours, but also 3G web browsing times of around 7. But the real shocker was WiFi web browsing battery life, which came in at around 13.5 hours. I ran this test twice on both phones because I was confused. It really lasts that long.

As a quick reminder, our web browsing benchmark loads a set of nearly two dozen webpages, pauses for 20 seconds on each one, and then loads the next page. None of the pages use flash, and the set loads endlessly until the phone's battery is exhausted. Screen brightness is set to 50%, and configured to remain on the whole time. Testing over WiFi is done in the same room as the AP.

For call time testing, we play music on repeat into the microphone of the phone and call another phone, also playing music into it. This simulates voice transmitted and received. The displays are also allowed to go to sleep as they would when used in a normal call.

The result of all this testing is the obvious conclusion that the KINs have incredible battery life. In fact, the WiFi battery life on these devices was nothing short of amazing. It's entirely possible that Sharp aggressively underclocked the NVIDIA Tegra APX 2600 to get these numbers, or that there's other throttling going on when the device is idle. We don't measure standby time yet, but whereas my HTC Incredible would be dead within 24 hours of being unplugged, the KINs would last multiple days in standby.

Performance in the browser wasn't stellar, but pinch zooming and other multitouch gestures felt snappy. At other times, the browser and UI would really feel choppy while scrolling. It was a mixed bag. One thing was for certain however, the JavaScript engine on the KIN browser was abysmally slow, so even though the browser felt decently fast for most browsing, the JavaScript heavy tests we run on smartphones gave very poor results.

Form Factor - ONE: Original/Unique, TWO: Bland/Soulless Microsoft's Cloud - Social Data
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • Belard - Wednesday, July 14, 2010 - link

    MS Mobile was always... garbage. It did some NEAT things, badly. Nothing more.

    Everyone I know who used WindowsMobile or Blackberrys quickly went to iPhone when the iPhone came out and haven't looked back.

    Of course, Apple is screwed up with their attitude issues with the lated iPhone4. Bad design flaw.
  • aebiv - Wednesday, July 14, 2010 - link

    What did it do badly?

    And I've found the opposite, a lot who went to the iPhone and BB were annoyed at the lack of applications and flexibility in the platforms,so they went back to WinMo
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, July 14, 2010 - link

    I think it says something when the best feature of an OS is that it allows other stuff to be installed over it.

    Really, most people don't want to spend the extra money on a bunch of software just to get the OS to a functional state. And it still feels like what it is - a hacked together assembly of programs that have an uneasy truce amongst each other. Unless you need some of the enterprise integration available, there is no way I could recommend a WM 6.x phone to anyone.
  • aebiv - Thursday, July 15, 2010 - link

    And in the same line of thinking as that, calling the iPhone a smartphone is a joke. It is a glorified, and admittedly very well done top end feature phone.
  • kmmatney - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Fist of all, saying the iPhone is not a smartphone is assinine. Second - Look at the scoreboard - WinMo 6 phones are losing ground for a very good reason - they just aren't as nice to use as the iPhone or Android. The battle has already been lost
  • aebiv - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    Really? Was the first gen a smartphone? It couldn't even send MMS messages or multitask at all. My old dumb phones did more than it did.

    What have we added? Apps? Great... what does that do for me again? Can I do network packet sniffing? Can I use it as an IR remote for TV's and devices?

    I can't plug anything into the iPhone through USB host either on an iPhone.

    It is NOT a smartphone, it is a glorified, overpriced feature phone. The sad thing is, WP7 and Android 3.0 are heading down the same path.
  • Commodus - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    Actually, you can use it as a remote. You need an adapter with a custom app, but it can be done.

    The iPhone is very much a smartphone. Just ask the enterprises using sales apps and juggling Exchange data. Ask the people using it as part of home automation systems.

    Yes, Apple could stand to loosen its app guidelines, but the very definition of a smartphone is one that focuses heavily on functions beyond making calls and receiving text messages, especially if it has robust apps. If anything, Windows Mobile is feeling less and less like a smartphone OS every day, as there are far fewer apps for it now than iOS (and likely Android too) and a narrower range.

    It's no longer 2002. We'd like you to join us in an era where you don't need a stylus to make up for bad UIs and bad touchscreens, where you're allowed to have fun on your phone, and where the web is an important part of life, not an afterthought (as it clearly is with Internet Explorer Mobile).
  • aebiv - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    Yes, we're improving the UI, that is for certain.

    However, there are somethings such as RDP and signatures that will never be "finger friendly" so why are we in such a rush to be complete rid of the stylus?

    The iPhone has had exchange issues both in synchronization with the latest phone, and with the first couple generations in "faking" the security policy enforcement for exchange.

    Can I push out apps and security policies to an iPhone from a central location? No. Can I use it as a messaging device? By all means.

    Yes, Apple has a lot of apps out there, but so many of them are worthless IMHO, Android is doing a bit better with that I'll admit, but they still don't have a great GPS application.

    I don't understand how you mean there are far fewer apps for WinMo, as virtually all the old ones still work and are still around, and new ones are still being made. One only has to look at Omarket or the XDA application to see all the new apps out for it.

    Question though, the iPhone still doesn't allow for network diag tools like packet capture and such right?
  • nangryo - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    That's why you need to wake up and get out of your distorted reality dream ok.
  • aebiv - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    Why do you hate someone who has different needs for a mobile phone OS so much?

    Are you really that insecure that everyone has to use what you use?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now