Far Cry 2

Featuring fantastic visuals courtesy of the Dunia Engine, this game also features one of the most impressive benchmark tools we have seen in a PC game. For single GPU results we set the performance feature set to Very High, graphics to High, and enable DX10 with 2xAA.

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2 - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

 

Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War II

We are big fans of the Warhammer franchise, especially Dawn of War II. One of the latest RTS games in our library is also one of the more demanding titles on both the CPU and GPU. We crank all options to Ultra, enable AA, and then run the built-in performance benchmark for our result.

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II - i5 661 CPU @ 4GHz

Nothing special to report on the frame rate front, these boards all perform to similar levels at a given clock frequency.

 

AutoCAD 2010 x64—Cadalyst 2008

We utilize AutoCAD 2010 x64 and the Cadalyst Labs 5 benchmark.

Application Performance - AutoCAD 2010 x64 - i5 661 CPU @ Stock

ECS holds an advantage in this benchmark over every other motherboard we've reviewed. We're still not sure on the cause, although we suspect it's related to C-States.

Testbed Setup and Power System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • mongoosesRawesome - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    use the integrated graphics (freeing up the PCIe) and a USB for the wireless. Or use a USB TV tuner with USB wireless, and then use whatever graphics you want. If you need extra expansion, mini-itx isn't for you.
  • Barnaby W. Füi - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    Newegg shows this board as using the Realtek 8111E LAN chipset. Doesn't the H55 already include gigabit LAN? Why wouldn't they use that?
  • Taft12 - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    Nearly all H55 motherboards use that crummy Realtek chip and it must be even cheaper than wiring up the integrated Intel network
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, June 17, 2010 - link

    I hear the Intel NIC costs as much on it's own to implement, as it does to buy the Realtek audio and LAN ICs as a pair (price break and volume purchase incentives). There's your reason.

    -Raja
  • pectin232 - Monday, September 20, 2010 - link

    Raja can you help with BIOS settings for this board. I truly appreciate. I have the same board with the i7 860 instead of the 865. I got 8GB DDR3 1333 memory from G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333 (PC3 10666) Desktop Memory Model F3-10666CL9D-8GBRL. Any help is truly appreciate.

    Phillip
  • Folterknecht - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    This cooler will likely fit in any HTPC-Case and there should be no problems with backplates and parts of the motherboars "connecting". the review is german but numbers and pictures should do the job. Note that you can also mount a slim (12mm) 120mm fan on top of it.

    http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/luftkuehlung/105...

    I'm not sure if this cooler is available in the U.S.
  • Khenke - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    If the end of the CPU to the graphics card is more than 27mm then it will most likely fit perfectly and with a 120 mm fan it will even cool the RAMs.
    As specs tell here: http://www.prolimatech.com/products/cpu_cooler/sam...
  • fr500 - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    Do you think this board is a "safer" overclocker than DFI MI P55-T36? I have had 4 of those boards (2 for customers one for a friend and one for me)

    I did extended testing on my customer's PCs and everything went fine. My friend let the board overclock by itself via ABS II and it's board died after just one day. Had to RMA. Many people reported the same issue and I guess they addressed it with BIOS updates.

    Does it need active cooling for the power circuitry? Inside my SG05 the DFI board needs a bit more airflow than the 120mm fan on front can provide. My build has an i5 750@150BCLK with 1.1v and the phases would get to 90c without active cooling. I had to add an 80mm slim fan from an old sff PSU to get temps on the safe side.

    To sum up. Is it better auto protecting itself if you push too far? (DFI board pushes too far by itself via ABS) and, does it need active cooling for the power circuitry?
  • Rajinder Gill - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    Hi,

    In my testing so far, the H55N-USB3 has better over-current protection. I've killed one DFI board just by booting it at 180 BCLK with an 870 oon the initial launch BIOS. Whether or not what I've found with teh H55N-USB3 will apply to all cases though I cannot say, as these things can be random. I did make a suggestion to Gigabyte to lock things down for the quad cores, and they told me they would look into what they feel is safe.

    A bit of airflow across the VRM won't hurt things if you want to keep temps low (although this has nothing to do with OCP per se). If I were running any one of these boards long term, I would probably keep myself to a 3.6GHz cap on the quads.

    -Raja
  • fr500 - Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - link

    Yes that is the same thing i saw with the DFI on the shipping BIOS, after that i lost my confidence.

    Thanks a lot it's reassuring.

    I think you could mount the H50 safely with 2 washers (included with the H50) on each hole by the way.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now