Battery Life

The OMAP 3430 delivered an interesting mix of battery life conclusions. It's interesting to see how much of the battery savings is implementation, radio chipset, and OS. Thankfully, we have the opportunity to do so here with the N900 and Motorola Droid.

Of course, the Motorola Droid is on Verizon, meaning our call test uses a CDMA 1xRTT '2.5G' network for voice, and '3G'r EV-DO for data. Our N900 came with an AT&T SIM, and unfortunately I don't have any T-Mobile SIMs laying around, so the call test used '2G' GSM voice, and '2.75G' EDGE-GPRS for data. That makes direct comparisons a bit tricky - though in practice it's easy to get a feel for what 3G calling and data on the N900 will be - it will be less than what we measured here for the 2G case.



I was shocked when I saw the call time numbers for the Motorola Droid, and ran the test 2 more times - all with the same outcome. If call time is what's important to you, the choice is a no-brainer. On the other hand, the N900 easily bests the Motorola Droid for WiFi browsing time, though 3G web browsing isn't a good comparison because of the EV-DO versus EDGE difference.

It's clear that battery life is very much an OS stack and radio stack dependent problem, even though we're running the same SoC. Remember that the N900 is running the 3430 at 600 MHz, and the Motorola Droid is running at 550 MHz.

OMAP 3430 Performance Speakerphone Loudness
Comments Locked

68 Comments

View All Comments

  • Fri13 - Sunday, June 20, 2010 - link

    Symbian is server-client architectured operating system. Symbian has EKA2 microkernel + servers (modules). But Symbian is not at same time _just_ the operating system. It has other features (like libraries and so on) as well what does not belong to the actual OS.
    Fact is that Symbian really is open source.

    But in other hand, the Android is not the operating system. It is a software system. The Linux is the operating system in the Android. Linux is monolithic kernel. Monolithic kernel is exactly same thing as operating system. It is the oldest (actually original) OS architecture. Server-client and layered architectures were developed almost few decades after the monolithic because there was demand to get OS architecture what is in theory more secure and more stable, but slower.

    Symbian is licensed under EPL. While Linux OS is licensed under GPLv2 (only).

    Both licenses are aproofed by the OSI and FSF. So both OS's are Libre software.
    Android is software system what has multple different licensed software in it. The Linux OS in it is the GPLv2 (what can not be changed) and the distributor itself can use as well closed source software if the license allows. Usually this means that the software platforms or the softwares what are responsible for user interface can be with different license than F/OSS license.

    By the facts, it is not true at all to say that "Android is not F/OSS operating system". Because a) Linux kernel is the operating system in Android. Android is just one distribution of the Linux. b) When talking about the operating systems and android, if wanted to be very wide speaking by terms, then Android is totally F/OSS.
  • numberoneoppa - Thursday, June 10, 2010 - link

    Great article, Brian. I learned a lot. =)
  • legoman666 - Thursday, June 10, 2010 - link

    I love my N900 :D I bought it last November, right when it was first released. I had a N810 at the time, so I was excited to get the next iteration. With PR1.2 and a modest overclock to 800mhz, it scores ~12000ms on the sunspider javascript benchmark, which is on par with the HTC Incredible and the Nexus 1.

    I didn't have to get t-mobile, as my local carrier, Cincinnati Bell, uses the same 3g frequencies as T-mobile. I get blazing fast speeds of 3mb/s.

    As Brian said in the review, the Skype integration is excellent. It even tells you how much credit you have remaining and the call cost at the end of the call. (And I can make video calls over 3g, take that iPhone)
  • topsecret - Thursday, June 10, 2010 - link

    You should test the N900 with it running meego.
  • Talcite - Friday, June 11, 2010 - link

    Nokia doesn't plan to port meego to the N900.
  • CityBlue - Friday, June 11, 2010 - link

    Yes they do plan to port MeeGo to the N900 - in fact, the N900 is the primary development platform for MeeGo so not making it available in one form or another would be utterly ridiculous.

    What Nokia have said is that the version of MeeGo that will be made available for the N900 will not be officially supported, which basically means you can't go running to Nokia Care when you find a bug. Since I can't believe anyone does this even with a supported OS, the lack of Nokia Care is no great loss - you'll still have a very large and committed community to fall back on for help.

    So in brief: Yes, MeeGo *IS* coming to the N900 - whether you install it or not is your choice.
  • jed22281 - Friday, June 11, 2010 - link

    Yup, exactly what cityblue said.
    Brian needs to clarify this in his article.
    There'll be plenty of "unofficial" support for meego on n900
  • tbutler - Wednesday, June 23, 2010 - link

    ...sorry, those airquotes have some very painful memories for those of us who lived through the 770 era. When 'unofficial' support meant a kludged-together hack.
  • Brian Klug - Friday, June 11, 2010 - link

    Thanks for the clarification CityBlue, I'll definitely update. I wrote some of this partially when support wasn't fully understood.

    -Brian
  • topsecret - Friday, June 11, 2010 - link

    "the Motorola Droid remains the flagship of Android phones that come with a hardware keyboard"
    I dunno, the samsung moment is a pretty nice phone.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now