Power Consumption

All of these drives offer great power consumption characteristics. The Kingston and OCZ drives are a bit better than Intel here.

Idle Power - Drive Only

Load Power - 2MB Sequential Write - Drive Only

Load Power - 4KB Random Write QD32 - Drive Only

TRIM Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • R-Smith - Tuesday, July 6, 2010 - link

    +1

    Then again, the best idea might be to avoid an SSD because then PC's without SSD's won't seem so slow.
  • MobiusStrip - Monday, June 7, 2010 - link

    "They simply are way to small" TOO. TOO small. T, O, O
  • racerx_is_alive - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    Seems like the 30GB OCZ Vertex is another good option in this price range. If its performance is anywhere close to the 120GB version in your SSD Bench, I wonder if it isn't a better option than the Onyx and the Kingston?
  • Taft12 - Friday, June 4, 2010 - link

    Performance of the 30GB Vertex is not close to the 120GB version.
  • Mugur - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    Does the non-Intel drives have a tool equivalent with the Intel SSD Toolbox? I mean, if I'm not sure if TRIM works, I just run that utility (it takes about 3 seconds :-) )...
  • Chloiber - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    The drives with Indilinxcontrollers (the normale one and ECO, I don't know about "Amigos" though!) have a "TRIM"-tool. You can manually trim under windows. It is beta though and should be used with care. For me, it always worked.

    Under Linux, you can issue a manual TRIM command anytime you want (google for hdparm and/or wiper.sh linux ). Also here, there are still problems, but again it worked for my Ultradrive perfectly well.
  • teohhanhui - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    And yes, I'll wait until the new Intel drives come out at the end of this year (presumably).
  • Phate- - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    What about ssd's with the JMicron JMF612/JMF618 controllers? These are the real budget-ssd's, the Kingston SNV425-S2 64GB is by far the cheapest ssd (with only the 128GB version offering more GB/euro). And what about the Corsair Reactor Series R60, Corsair Performance series P64 and Corsair Extreme series E64. These drives have cost about the same as the Intel Postville 80GB when you look at GB/euro.

    I am not interested in the 30-40GB ssd's, they are to small. Neither am I interested in the high-end ssd's. I'm interested in an ssd with more then 40GB (and less then 80GB) with a decent capacity/performance/euro ratio.

    Well to be precise, I AM interested in the smaller and faster ssd's, because ssd's interest me, and it are mostly wonderful articles, but these reviews hardly help me in my search for the perfect ssd for me. Namely the midrange.
  • loimlo - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    Kingston uses the same controller across their SSD series. In other words, SSDNOW V series 30/64/128GB drives share identical controller. You can base 64/128GB performance on Anand's 30GB review. That said, 64/128GB should be faster given higher read/write speed compared to 30GB version.
  • Phate- - Thursday, June 3, 2010 - link

    If so, then explain the difference between de V+ second series and the newer V second series. If they are exactly the same, why would they bother with releasing 2 exactly the same, but different named series?

    http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1197/1/
    http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1237/7/

    Too bad they didn't compare the ssd's with eachother though.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now