As critical as I have been of the CPU decisions in the next-generation consoles, I can't help but be excited about their arrival. My expectations are properly set: I am expecting high end PC graphics on a console, nothing more, but I am actually happy with that. For me, just as there is no replacement for PC gaming, there is equally no replacement for console gaming. So in 19 days I'm looking forward to spending a good hunk of Thanksgiving, eating turkey and playing Xbox 360.

I have been quite impressed with Xbox Live; when it was first launched the whole idea was a bit silly to me: (MMORPGs aside) why would anyone pay for online gaming after you've already paid money for the game? But then after using Xbox Live, I started to understand it. For some reason, only a handful of PC games really "got" online matchmaking. On one end of the spectrum you had companies like Blizzard, whose Warcraft 3 online matchmaking was excellent and as easy as could be. But on the other end you had the crap that Ubisoft and Westwood put out, which was not nearly as polished (purely in the matchmaking sense, the games themselves were great). And then in the middle of it all you had the first person shooters, which didn't really have a matchmaking component; you sort of just hopped on a server and killed people - which is fine.

Like their PC counterparts, many games for the original Xbox unfortunately also suffered from poor online play. Microsoft's universal matchmaking system for all Xbox 360 games will hopefully fix that.

Unfortunately I am not insanely happy about the launch titles for Xbox 360, especially not the fact that I've only heard of one that has gone gold. Microsoft is missing their Halo this time around, but if all goes well they may have a stronger overall launch thanks to the fact that they have a much greater variety of what appear to be relatively good games. It's the "age-old" one supercar vs. lots of cool cars in your garage argument.

I'm not strictly a Xbox 360 guy though, I am quite interested in PS3, but right now it is too far away for me to get too excited about it. I am very curious to see how this will all play out, given the huge difference in console sales between PS2 and Xbox 1. Microsoft has truly learned a lot since their first attempt at a gaming console, I'm wondering if that is enough to take on Sony.

As for Nintendo, they could have a huge success on their hands, but I'm just not excited about it at this point. I get what they are trying to do, but I'm not sure if the Revolution is the right way to bring console gaming to the masses.
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • microAmp - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/viewblogpost.aspx?...">http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/viewblogpost.aspx?...
  • Ozenmacher - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Is it just me or have most of the screens and movies from the Xbox 360 camp been highly lackluster? I was expecting a gaint leap in graphics, however, from the shots thus far, the games don't look much better than original Xbox games. I don't know, I was just expecting more from these "next gen systems".
  • Josh7289 - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Same here. Contrasting with what Anand said, I absolutely, positively, beyond a doubt fell that the direction Nintendo is taking with the Revolution is the best thing that has ever happened to consoles. Sony and Microsoft's way are not the way to bring console gaming to the masses, and that has already been proven for over 20 years. I personally care nothing for the PS3 or Xbox 360. They both offer more of the same. The graphics are not much better than they are now, and the Revolution will have the same situation with the graphics, which is why I support Nintendo's decision to make a small, quiet, affordable system. Graphics are no longer an issue with gaming, so now that graphics have evolved to such a point, the next thing to update is user interface. Thus, the Revolution controller, and thus, the quantum leap we were expecting in gaming.
  • UNCjigga - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    So what TV/monitor will you be pairing it with? Disappointed at all in the (apparent) lack of HDMI support on the Xbox 360?
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    It'll be paired to a 2nd gen sammy DLP. HDMI would have been nice, but I've learned long ago to stop expecting large manufacturers to cater to the bleeding edge enthusiast (not that HDMI is bleeding edge anymore).

    My main hope is that the lag issues the sammy DLP has, presumably because of the video scaler, go away with native 720p content.

    Take care,
    Anand
  • puffpio - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    2nd generation Samsumg..is that the HLN or HLP

    Haven't kept up w/ the older models, but the HLR models still exhibit that problem because there is no way turn the DNIe post processing off..I think with the older models you can do it.

    Have you seen the HP DLP RPTV's??? omg..so sweet..1080p over HDMI in addition to component so you can connect it to your computer if you wanted. Also all the inputs are in the front of the TV and there are hidden behind a panel...so no more pulling the TV to get to the inputs. No lag issues either...and a 20% discount if you are a student! :P

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now