Three Kinds of Notifications

Fitting in directly after multitasking are notifications, which Microsoft hopes developers heavily leverage even after multitasking becomes viable. There are three primary methods of notifications baked into WP7S thus far.

The first is a nod to WebOS' less intrusive method of sliding notifications in at the bottom. Instead, notifications slide in from the top ala Android. These are called "toast" notifications, since they're animated like toast popping out of a toaster. Funny, right? The next is notification through tiles. Developers can push new images to the tile, as well as new text atop the tile, letting users know something has changed. A frequent demo was illustrating that the smiley atop the SMS application changes as new messages arrive, in addition to the counter. Lastly, in-application notifications where the dialog slides down revealing new information. We've seen this last kind of notification in virtually every implementation; it isn't so much a true notification as it is a page event.


Top left - Tile. Bottom Left - Toast. Right - In-App.

All three of these notification schemes fully leverage a backend push notification service, similar in architecture to iPhone OS' push notifications. This is what Microsoft wants developers to use to mitigate the lack of background processing, very similar to the message Apple has been communicating for some time now. It doesn't cover all the bases or every possible use scenario, but does save battery and allow a way for third party applications to alert users.

Interestingly, the incoming phone call situation is another notification still being finalized. We've seen briefly what the notification looks like, and at present it appears to look like a larger "toast."

Platform Architecture, Multitasking, and User Experience The State of Cut and Paste 
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • glynor - Monday, March 22, 2010 - link

    I don't know... I'm no Apple fanboy but I've never understood why people get all excited about the supposedly superior Nexus One hardware:

    1. Crappy 6-bit dithered screen with horrible super-saturated color reproduction.
    2. Multitouch broken in hardware.
    3. 512MB of onboard Flash memory all that's available for applications.

    Yes, it does have a really nice main processor, but that's really about all it has going for it hardware wise. The rest is at best equal to the much-earlier iPhone 3GS, and at worst isn't even up to that level.

    Don't get me wrong... I love the open nature of the platform. But I really don't like MANY of the choices that both HTC and Motorola made in these current iterations.
  • n0nsense - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    LOL :)
    iPhone is a gadget. It has tons of apps, but has to be tweaked to be a powerful tool.
    As for crap hardware, Nexus is one step ahead of iPhone, while many others on pair. Of course there are tons of cheaper (crappier)devices, but they are good for market share. More devices, more developers.
    Don't get me wrong, I prefer plain Linux on my mobile (something like MeeGo), but if i had to choose, iPhone and Winmo sharing the last place.
  • bupkus - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    I'm sitting here with my Palm Treo Pro with Windows Mobile 6.1 and while understanding the douse and flame approach I'm wondering why just because my desktop Windows gets service releases I had imagined my phone would receive the same?
    Silly me.
  • gnesterenko - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    Droid for me. Thanks for clarifying.
  • kanabalize - Monday, March 22, 2010 - link

    unless android has lotsa eyecandy(icon style, chic GUI design) like iphoneOS, its going to be dead....

    Remember the real consumer is the non-technological savvy users not people who reads alot of reviews and familiar with the technology...

    when people have to choose between iphone and other android phone they aren't really care about what is behind the OS but what is right there in front of their eyes....
  • dhaoracle - Sunday, March 28, 2010 - link

    I'm mad that this world is still naive idiots when it comes to things of any such. I might do that with a nice piece of ass but i will at least to get to know whats her name and what she's doing here(wherever).
    And why is anyone talking about Windows Mobile 6.5. stop hating and do your research. Google is nothing but eye-candy nothing else but a pretty balloon with lots of helium and pastry at the bottom. thats it nothing more nothing less.I would go with iPhone before Android and i hate iPhone...
  • darwinosx - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    Looks like the juvenile Droid ads found a sucker.
  • CSMR - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    It makes sense. Android is competitive or almost competitive with WM6.5. Now WM has lost most of its features while android will only improve.
  • deputc26 - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    Seriously why no Android review? It is the most power-user friendly mobile platform. 2.1 is far superior to WinMo 6.5.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Sunday, March 21, 2010 - link

    I'm working on a review of the AT&T Nexus One :)

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now