Final Words

 

Update: Since the publication of this review OWC appears to have switched controllers for the Mercury Extreme SSD. The current specs look similar to that of SandForce's SF-1200 controller, not the SF-1500 used in the earlier drives. Performance and long term reliability (in an enterprise environment) are both impacted. For more information, read this.

With half the capacity of the 100GB Vertex LE we looked at last week, OWC's 50GB Mercury Extreme shows that while there is a performance drop with SandForce's SF-1500 50GB platform it is limited strictly to small file random write speed. Even with the performance drop, the drive is no slower than Intel's X25-M G2. And in sequential write performance it's still significantly faster.

As I mentioned in my Vertex LE review, the SandForce controller used in this drive is still largely unproven. OWC does offer a 5 year warranty on the drive, so presumably you'll be covered if something should happen to it - I would just recommend backing up regularly.

As a SSD, 50GB is enough for a notebook or a boot/applications drive assuming you don't have too many large applications. With more inherent spare area than any other consumer SSD on the market, the Mercury should be a bit more resillient as it approaches its full capacity. Despite a competitive price tag, this 50GB drive is easily the most expensive small capacity SSD you can buy in its class. Not in terms of overall price, but in terms of cost per GB. Intel's 80GB X25-M will give you around 50% more usable space for roughly the same price. You do get more performance out of the 50GB OWC drive, but with only 50GB of space it's really a tradeoff. If you only run one or two I/O intensive applications, then the 50GB drive may be best suited for you. If you run more than just a couple of apps, you may be better off with the Intel X25-M.

I am still unsure about the long term reliability of these drives based on SandForce's controller. It will take several months for me to get to a comfortable point with them. If you're fine with being an early adopter here, by all means go for it. If the capacity doesn't turn you off, the performance at first glance looks quite good.

AnandTech Storage Bench
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • iwodo - Friday, February 26, 2010 - link

    LOL, when i read it you makes it sounds like a new build is finally out.
  • nerdtalker - Friday, February 26, 2010 - link

    Awesome review Anand! Great read as always.

    Strange that they wouldn't let you open the drive. I had always wondered whether particular vendors were more or less controlling about that kind of thing. Wonder if this one also has a supercap inside.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Friday, February 26, 2010 - link

    It doesn't have a supercap and it's the same controller as the Vertex LE. I just got the distinct impression that they want this thing in a condition fit for resale (which is a bad idea imho).

    Take care,
    Anand
  • Xtrafresh - Saturday, February 27, 2010 - link

    maybe they just want it in that condition so they can send the next reviewer the same sample as a representative of a purchhased drive?

    Great review Anand, exciting stuff. Now if only the prices would start coming down a bit...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now