World in Conflict - Soviet Assault

We utilize the built-in benchmark for World in Conflict. We set the advanced options to Very High and manually set AA to 2x and AF to 16x. We take the median score from five benchmark runs.


World in Conflict - Soviet Assault

The single card results at x8 is trailing the x16 setups by 3% at stock and 5% when overclocked. Minimum frame rates for the single card results are around 4% better on the X58 platform at stock and trails the P55 by 3% when overclocked .

World in Conflict CrossFire Scaling – Average Frame Rates


ATI HD 5870 CF Scaling World in Conflict World in Conflict 4.2GHz
Intel Core i7 920 (X58) 58.9% 77.6%
Intel Core i7 860 (P55) 45.5% 70.7%

At stock speeds, the X58 has a 13% scaling advantage over the P55 and almost 7% when overclocked.

World in Conflict CrossFire Scaling – Minimum Frame Rates


ATI HD 5870 CF Scaling World in Conflict World in Conflict 4.2GHz
Intel Core i7 920 (X58) 4.2% 27.3%
Intel Core i7 860 (P55) 8.7% 5.9%

Minimum frame rates favor the P55 in our stock clock speed results right over 4% but trail the X58 around 21% when overclocked.

Battle Forge - Renegade

Our first DX11 benchmark comes courtesy of Battle Forge. We set all options to Very High and enable DX11. We take the median score of five benchmark runs utilizing the in-game benchmark.

Battle Forge - Renegade

The single card results at x8 trails the x16 results by about 2% at stock and when overclocked. Minimum frame rates for the single card results are around 50% better on the P55 platform at stock and both platforms are even when overclocked.

Battle Forge CrossFire Scaling – Average Frame Rates


ATI HD 5870 CF Scaling Battle Forge Battle Forge 4.2GHz
Intel Core i7 920 (X58) 84.4% 84.4%
Intel Core i7 860 (P55) 84.5% 83.1%

At stock and overclocked speeds, both platforms are practically tied when it comes to scaling in average frame rates.

Battle Forge CrossFire Scaling – Minimum Frame Rates


ATI HD 5870 CF Scaling Battle Forge Battle Forge 4.2GHz
Intel Core i7 920 (X58) 225% 184.6%
Intel Core i7 860 (P55) 133.3% 176.9%

Minimum frame rates favor the X58 in our stock and overclocked speed results. This title thrives on CrossFire for improving minimum frame rates. Although the percentages are large, the minimum frame rates are still in the 36 fps range, more than enough for an enjoyable game experience.

Resident Evil meets Tales of Valor Batman plus Power Consumption
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • yacoub - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    well considering Intel's offering no other quad-core 45nm or 32nm solution for the gamer-enthusiast who isn't interested in spending hundreds of dollars more, Lynnfield is the only option available for the foreseeable future from Intel.

    AMD has a chance to take back some marketshare IF they can come up with a low-TDP, high-performing, quad-core CPU at the right price. Do they have something like that coming out?
  • the zorro - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    Amd's dragon platform is the only way for directx 11
    lynnfield is crippled and expensive.
    this means phenom 2.
  • iamezza - Friday, October 2, 2009 - link

    You are crippled .. in the brain!
  • MadMan007 - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    Would you PLEASE just go DIAF with your crippled lynnfield bs?
  • trabpukcip - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    On the second Far Cry 2 Graph, the resolution should be "1920 x 1080" and not "1920 x 1200"?
  • goinginstyle - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    Where are the results for the HD5850 cards?
  • elivebuy - Tuesday, December 8, 2009 - link

    http://www.elivebuy.com">http://www.elivebuy.com

    Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

    UGG BOOT $50

    Jewerly $20

    Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
    Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
    Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

    Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
    Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
    New era cap $15

    Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25

    FREE sHIPPING
    http://www.elivebuy.com">http://www.elivebuy.com
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    Where are the results for the 2900HD?
  • ValiumMm - Monday, January 18, 2010 - link

    "What about the 2900HD"

    lol
  • GokieKS - Tuesday, September 29, 2009 - link

    Because the Radeon HD2900 is obviously as relevant a card in the current marketplace as the HD5850.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now