Setup and Startup

Systems that are shipped often need a little tightening and reseating prior to boot up, but the F131 started right up without issue.




They took some care here to bump it up.






Our Core 2 Duo E8400, 3.0GHz stock, comes overclocked - or "redlined" in Maingear parlance - to 4.0GHz at a 445MHz FSB. Maingear's attention to detail here in choosing their core voltage and clocks is good, but they didn't go to the nth degree in tweaking memory timings as we've seen other suppliers like Überclok do. We also see that the Kingston DDR2-800 rated memory is being operated here at 1066MHz speeds, but if the system is stable we won't criticize them for that. Overall, this is quite a good effort - we've seen suppliers do much less overclocking for a significant price premium. Maingear includes their overclocking with the cost of the system, and it yields a large performance increase, so a well deserved kudos here.


First boot is quite good.





The desktop is clean, the number of processes is reasonably low for Vista, and there is some genuine value-added software. Detonator 177.41 drivers came preinstalled, which were up to date at the time of shipment. We also see a few other interesting icons on the desktop.


Maingear provides some optional installation packages of AVG Free Antivirus and OpenOffice. This is a great approach: the installation option is available and easy to execute for the user if they want this software, and if they don't, they can simply delete the folders without having to bother with uninstalling software. This is precisely the kind of flexibility we mention frequently in our reviews, and hats off to Maingear in this respect.

Specifications General Performance
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • yyrkoon - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    No, ludicrously bad programming would be Hellgate: London. CivIV or 3 DO NOT take ridiculously long on even a moderate PC. A couple of minutes towards end of the game with hundreds of cities spread across 8-11 AI players is reasonable.
  • headbox - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    Seriously? A $4,000+ computer booting out of the box is practically "unheard of?"

    The packaging looks terrible. It's like they crammed some stuff into the box a bare case came in. Ever unpack an Apple computer?

    PCs haven't changed for years- metal box, cables everywhere, and the best anyone can do is make the cables a little more tidy than the next guy? You'd think engineers (other than Apple) could come up with a better system to mount a board and PSU into a reliable, stylish and sturdy case by now.
  • Penti - Monday, November 17, 2008 - link

    This seriously isn't designed by engineers.

    It's just stuff independent system-builders put together with retail parts.

    They aren't engineers designing and ordering their custom stuff from OEMs/ODMs/EMSs. They don't try to be and they couldn't. They are into assembling stuff. Buy a Dell if you'd would want something like that. Otherwise just build it yourself as you can buy the same exact parts in shops. That's why they are all cluttered and stuff.
  • D3SI - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link


    Apple employs engineers? haha good one.
  • Jedi2155 - Thursday, November 13, 2008 - link

    I have to say that Apple probably employs some very damn good engineers. Misguided ones...but damn good ones.
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, November 13, 2008 - link

    Not sure if misguided is the word, they just don't mind the functional aspects of the design taking a back seat to the aesthetic aspects. Maybe Apple parties like Max Mosley.
  • Ratman6161 - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    At work we buy dozens of generic cheapo Dell desktops and I've never had one of those that did not work out of the box. If I were paying this kind of premium for a system, I would certainly be upset if it couldn't do the same. Another thought is that one could buy the components and build it themselves for a lot less money. So I would assume that the person who would be buying this system would be someone who does not want to (or does not know how to) mess with it - and is willing to pay for that. That sort of person is probably going to RMA the system if it doesn't boot out of the box.
  • Matt Campbell - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    These systems have large, often dual-slot video cards, extremely heavy copper air coolers or water cooling setups, etc. that make them much trickier to ship than a traditional desktop. Usually it's as simple as reseating the video card or plugging in a S-ATA hard drive. That area does bug me, the S-ATA retention system should really be better.
  • headbox - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    Most people don't know how to reseat a video card or plug in a SATA drive.

    What if you bought a car that didn't work? It could be as simple as connecting the starter. Do you know how to do that?
  • 3DoubleD - Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - link

    First of all, this computer isn't $4,000, it was $2130 + Shipping. If it were an Apple, yes it would be $4,000, but fortunately it isn't so we save ~$1,800. Oh wait.. you can't buy a desktop from Apple unless it is the Mac Pro, so you have to get a dual socket Xeon with FB Dimms. To make things worse, you horrible choices for graphics: 4x 2600XT Crossfire (wow that might be as fast as a single 2900XT in optimal conditions), 8800GT (is Apple clearing out old Nvidia/ATI stock or what?) or Quadro FX 5600 ($2,700 upgrade from the 8800GT). To top it off, the case is fugly. What is with the handles?

    As for the unpacking process. The computer tower clearly came in the Styrofoam packaging beneath the tray additional parts (extra PSU cables, display adaptors, ect), instruction manuals, recovery CDs, ect. The only difference between the box used here and the box a Mac comes with is that a team of people at Apple wasted their time designing the box to look good. Only a person who buys a Mac gives a crap about fancy Styrofoam and pretty cardboard. The packing was perfectly functional (as the author mentioned in the article, did you read it?).

    PCs haven't changed for years... that's true as they still use the same parts more or less. I think another interesting observation would be that Macs haven't stopped copying the PC design and branding it as something else for years! I'm really not sure what you are looking for here. How else to you package computer components together? You could use a large case that is optimized for cooling and noise suppression or you can try to cram the components together and optimize for portability. Hmmm maybe you could stick a monitor on that portable computer... ya, that's a great idea... I'd call it a laptop! Get it... because it fits on your lap!

    Finally, do you really think engineers are responsible for the look of Apple's computers or most cosmetic designs for that matter? Usually it is an industrial design artist who's job is to make products look pretty. Unless ergonomics are a factor, an engineer wouldn't even come close to the drawing board. Where the engineer comes into the pictures is to fight with the industrial design artist when they try to hinder the functionality of the original design.

    Anyway, the point was that there is nothing wrong with this computer, it is actually not a horrible deal. If I were 20 years older and had a lot more money than time, this is something I would seriously consider. $600-700 isn't bad for the time you save and the quality of the build.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now