Our Take

If Live View is not an important feature to you then you won't find a DSLR camera that offers more value than the Sony A200. The A200 offers the widest ISO range available in its class and it is definitely not a stripped entry model as you find in much of the competition. The best way to position the A200 is to consider it as an updated, improved, and generally enhanced version of the A100.

For the $499 street price you get a DSLR with a 10.2MP sensor that has been refined over the past two years. Electronics have been updated and AF offers 9 points with a center cross AF point instead of the outdated 3-point AF featured on the Nikon D60 and Olympus E420/E520. You also get a decent, large, bright viewfinder that has the highest magnification in its class. It is definitely not the tunnel viewfinder concession you will find on the Sony A300/A350, which sacrificed the optical viewfinder for a capable Live View system. It is also much better than the Olympus viewfinders in this class and equal or superior to the Nikon/Canon entry models.

Other unexpected features are a pop-up flash that actually can be used as a wireless control flash, unlike the Nikon D60 or any Canon camera, and adjustable Dynamic Range Optimization, which is a decidedly prosumer level feature. There are even options for a battery grip, not available with the D60 or Olympus models, and an optional rigid LCD cover from Sony such as you find on the Nikon D90 and D300 prosumer models.

The A200 is also exceptionally easy to use, with a few simple external controls that belie the sophistication of the actual options available. Notable are an Auto ISO setting that self-adjusts depending on the mode selected and a "program-shift" option with the Command Dial in Program Mode. The A200 also features the extremely useful "Fn" button, which brings up a single menu that can be used for controlling most camera adjustments. It is simple and works well - so well that recent Canon models like the 50D are now offering a similar feature.

This does not mean that the A200 does not make some concessions to price, because it does. The depth-of-field preview is gone from the left side of the lens mount on the A200, and there is just one front Command Dial, although the A100 also had just one dial - in fact you need to move up to the A700 to get two command dials in the Sony line. However, unlike competitors the dropped features are not important items like exposure bracketing (Nikon) or Spot metering (Canon).

In looking at the whole of the entry market, we have to conclude the A200 is a clear best value. There are now 26 Sony lenses available as well as many other reasonably priced Minolta AF lenses that will work very well on the Sony A200. The images you can capture are at least as good as any competitor and the range of image control is considerably better than competitors in the entry-class without compromising ease-of-use. Even the body-integrated IS and auto-sensor cleaning will make it easy to add reasonably priced lenses to your outfit in the future since you won't have to look for the more expensive IS or VR optical stabilized lenses.

Put it all together and you won't find a better value for your $499 than the Sony A200 kit with the 18-70mm kit lens. The kit lens itself even covers a wider 27-105mm equivalent range than competing entry models, which are 18-55mm lenses. This is all predicated on one significant caveat, and that is that the A200 does not have any form of Live View. Personally, we don't fault Sony for this since the Live View on other entry models is more a checklist item than a truly useful feature. The Nikon D60 and Pentax K200D also do not feature Live View, and the other Live View implementations are very slow and only truly useful for situations where you have lots of time to compose and focus - which is definitely not a soccer game or shooting the kids playing.

If Live View is an important feature for you then you definitely need to choose another entry camera like the capable Canon XS. If you want fast Live View our advice would be to move to the Sony A300 at $599 or the A350 at $799. Both feature Sony's unique, fast Live View on a tilt LCD screen and they are both truly useful for shooting sports or kids. Their compromise is a mediocre optical viewfinder, so make sure that is a compromise you are willing to make.

Sony A200 vs. Sony A350 vs. Sony A700 v.4
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    I think particularly in the entry level DSLR arena, using the included lenses for images is important. The pictures of even a moderate DSLR with kit lens should easily surpass what most P&S cameras can manage, which is one of the big attractions. As soon as you get into lenses, however, you open up a huge can of worms.

    As for the subject material... well, I'll leave it to the photography buffs to debate what should be used. I believe Wes is working on some photos showing what the A200 can do out of a static test environment, but in order to provide any semblance of apples-to-apples shooting comparisons I think you need to do something like the shots Wes uses. I know I for one wish the white balance on my XTi did better under Tungsten lighting.
  • nowayout99 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    "...it is easy to forget that many buyers are looking for the absolute best "bang-for-the-buck" in a camera."

    Really...? Therein lies a divide between AT and readers. Articles for high-end products really aren't appealing to that many people, yet that's almost all we've gotten for cameras.

    Even this $500 cam is pretty high-end priced for the vast majority of people that just want something they can take around with them for fun. How about some comparisons of joe schmoe cameras?
  • strikeback03 - Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - link

    On Sunday a friend and I went to a local state park to get some pictures of the leaves. He owns a Canon SD600, a relatively decent couple year old P&S. At one point he was asking me to get some close-ups of a rock face, so instead I tossed my Sigma 18-200 OS on my Rebel XT body (wasn't using either) and let him play with those. I think he is now in the market for an SLR, as some comparison shots he did with his SD600 just blew him away, and that was just in basic JPEG mode.
  • GTVic - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    This is what epinions and CNET is for. I don't think you will find too many serious reviewers who want to spend their time keeping updated on the sub $200 camera market. It is not interesting, there are too many cameras to keep track of and not many people do serious research on that level of purchase.
  • adder - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    well i hope u guys do some lens reviews,and for people who are going in for a entry level dslr may not know much about lenses other then the kits lenses.
  • strikeback03 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    Is the grip the same as the A100? Between the length and positioning of the shutter release/dial, I found the A100 quite uncomfortable to use. For me either the shorter bodies like the Canon Rebels or the taller ones like Nikon D80/Canon 40D are far more comfortable.
  • FATCamaro - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    It is a great point and shoot camera. I use mine a LOT and couldn't be happier. I use it as a point and shoot except for ISO and flash control. The ISO control is incredible simple and useful. I would reccomend this to to anyone switching up to a DSLR from a shitty point and shoot.
  • DanD85 - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    It seems you forget the still available D40/D40x and I think they perfectly fit in the budget DSLRs you have here.
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    Ken Rockwell notwithstanding, the D40 is 6 megapixels and the D40x is the previous model to the D60. Both are capable entry DSLRs that have been updated in the D60, which we did test in our comparison.

    The D40/D40x are 3-point AF, have no sensor cleaning, and come with non-IS kit lenses. Their features have been upgraded on the D60, which is the entry model we tested.
  • xsilver - Monday, October 20, 2008 - link

    also forgotten is the pentax line. The k200d doesnt have live view either but using old lenses on them is a joy.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now