Acer 6920G - Thoughts and Summary

We had some initial difficulties getting the Blu-ray drive to function with our test disc (Jumper), but an update to the Acer media software resolved our issues. That's the good news, and watching a Blu-ray movie looked great. Unfortunately, many Blu-ray movies use a 2.35:1 aspect ratio, so the difference between a 16:9 and 16:10 LCD isn't going to be a huge benefit - you still get black bars on the top and bottom. If that were the only problem with Blu-ray support, we wouldn't have any concerns. Unfortunately, consider the following images.

The first image is what we saw after updating our graphics drivers - using official drivers from Acer, no less! We also tried unofficial hacked drivers from LaptopVideo2Go.com, with a similar result (albeit a different error message). We're not actually sure if the problem comes from the drivers we used or if we installed some other program on the laptop that created a conflict; the issue remains unresolved. The second picture is the same movie running without any difficulties, only this time we are using a 720P x264 encode. You want to talk about shooting yourself in the foot? Here we have a laptop equipped with the latest and greatest multimedia hardware, and it refuses to play back a 100% legitimate Blu-ray movie. Meanwhile, it has no difficulty whatsoever playing downloaded HD movies. Sure, quality is a bit better with the original Blu-ray version, but only serious home theater buffs are likely to care. Of course, there are also legitimate HD movie sources out there (the final picture comes via a TVTonic video), and if you happen to have 720P or 1080P 16:9 aspect ratio sources, we definitely like the Acer LCD more for multimedia use than the various WUXGA laptops we've tested.

Besides this particular "driver" snafu, we just have to say in general that our experience with watching Blu-ray movies on computers (and especially laptops) has been less than stellar. First, you need to update your media player software on a regular basis, and often it's quite difficult to find the latest patches. Acer did better than the Alienware m15x in this respect, but when we consider the above we would just as soon save $300 and forget about having a Blu-ray drive - at least for the time being. No, none of this is Acer's fault, but it does mean we recommend a different model of the 6920G than what we are reviewing.

We're going to list off various complaints first, but try not to let the negativity get you down. This really is a decent laptop, but there are a few items that we need to mention before we get to the good points. First, Acer still only ships the 6920G with a 32-bit operating system. If they're going to go ahead and give you 4GB of memory and Vista, there's no reason to continue shipping a 32-bit installation. Okay, so maybe there are a few incompatible programs people might want to use, but many of those will also have problems with Windows Vista and not just 64-bit operating systems. At the very least, it would be nice to have a choice, although considering Acer doesn't allow customized builds this omission is a bit more excusable than with companies that allow you to select individual components (i.e. Dell).

Another point that we need to emphasize - and you will see this later in the benchmarks - is that the GeForce 9500M GS is completely inadequate for running modern games at 1920x1080, or in many cases 1280x800. If you are willing to turn down the details levels and run at lower resolutions, the 9500M GS might be able to deliver an acceptable gaming experience, but for a similar price there are definitely better gaming laptops available. This applies to all three midrange laptops today, but we'll get this point out of the way up front.

Some of the design decisions on the 6920 could have been better. For example, a large area to the left of the keyboard is devoted to the "Acer CineDash media console", a fancy name for some multimedia keys like volume control and next/previous track, plus a few quick launch keys. These keys are touch sensitive, and we inadvertently activated them on a regular basis. The most useful button in this area seems to be the "hold" button that disables all of the other keys. We would have been happier if the multimedia functions were placed above the keyboard like on many other laptops. Otherwise, we didn't have any issues with the Acer keyboard. Another boneheaded move is the placement of the two speakers. Acer includes a base expander that actually helps improve audio quality for the built-in speakers, but then they went and placed one speaker at the far right and the other speaker in the center area above the keyboard. The result is that stereo recordings don't sound quite right because they are shifted to the right side. The various surround sound enhancements may help, and if you sit a bit further away from the laptop the effect isn't as noticeable, but this is really such a strange oversight. All they need to do is change the position of the power button slightly and they could have had the two speakers in the accepted locations.

We've listed several complaints so far, and at this point you might think that we didn't really care for the 6920G. In reality, we found plenty to like; you just need to keep the above concerns in mind. We mentioned that the 6920G is designed to be a multimedia computer, and the heart of every multimedia laptop would have to be the display. Forget about the aspect ratio for a moment - even without that advantage, the LCD in the 6920G is without a doubt one of the best laptop displays we've used, particularly in terms of multimedia laptops. (I'd still like to test the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro as a point of reference, but unfortunately I have not had an opportunity to do so.) Color accuracy after calibration is very good - one of the best results we've seen so far - brightness levels are good, and it has the second-best color gamut we've seen on a mobile LCD. The only other laptop that's come close in terms of display quality is ASUS G2P, and while that has a better color gamut we're willing to make a small compromise there in order to get a higher resolution display. Another nice multimedia feature is that Acer includes full support for 5.1 audio output, as well as HDMI support. Battery life is also good (though not great) for a laptop of this size, and you should be able to watch most (non-Blu-ray) movies before your battery runs out of steam.

Overall, the Aspire 6920G isn't perfect, but it does very well in the multimedia arena. If you're a bit more cautious in terms of what software and drivers you choose to install, Blu-ray support and a very good LCD make this a nice mobile movie platform. Get ready to make all of your iPhone/iPod Touch/iPod Video friends turn green with envy when you fire up a high-definition movie. (Then prepare to return the favor as they drop their iPhone/iPod into a pocket and wander off while you try to pack up your seven pound notebook.) The display quality also makes this laptop great for home or business use - all other things being equal, we always prefer working with a better LCD. Down the road, we would like to see LED backlighting and a Centrino 2 platform with DDR3 memory, but those changes would only improve an already good laptop. Acer has definitely been in the market for a long time, and like many large companies the quality of their products can be hit or miss. I've also dealt with Acer support over the years, and while they haven't been the fastest to respond, the problems did get resolved. In this case, the 6920G is a solid offering and definitely better than many of the alternatives.

Acer 6920G – Features and Specifications AVADirect IFL90 – Overview
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link

    Not that it really matters since they're all pretty slow, but the HD 3470 is about half the performance of the HD 2600 and 8600M GS. Like I said in the review, though, if you really care about graphics performance you'll want a lot more than even the 8600M/HD 2600 (or 9600M/HD 3600).

    Personally, the minimum configuration I'd go with on the T400 ends up at around $1350 - because the 80GB default HDD is way too small for me. I personally think the Thinkpad laptops work well but look pretty dull, but build quality has always been good on the systems I've seen/used. I'd love to get one for testing (and in particular I'd like to test the LCD - I've heard some models even have S-IPS panels, but maybe that was only on some of their previous laptops when they were still IBM), but so far no luck there.
  • Voldenuit - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link

    The T60p had an S-IPS panel, as did several other earlier models. The current crop of T400/500/W500 use TN-Film. Notebookreview compared the screen on the T400 favourably against the S-IPS on the T60:
    http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4...">http://www.notebookreview.com/default.a...D=4569&a...

    Bottom line, you shouldn't be doing colour-calibration sensitive work on a laptop in the field anyway, and if you're doing it indoors, you'd probably want an external display for the added resolution if nothing else.
  • strikeback03 - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link

    That review clearly shows that the TN screens still have along way to go to match the S-IPS in anything other than brightness.

    And if you had a decent display on a laptop, why not use it for color-sensitive work? Lenovo is guessing people will with the new W700.
  • Voldenuit - Saturday, September 20, 2008 - link

    Because a typical laptop in the field will be subjected to various (changing) lighting conditions, so any colour calibration on the lcd will be moot. That and most laptop displays don't even give you the option to mess with the ICC profiles.

    The W700 is not exactly "portable", so it is likely to stay anchored in an office.

    The sad practical reality though is that practically no one is making S-IPS screens for laptops anymore (see the lenovo blogs on this issue), so we're stuck with TN-film until the market responds with a demand for higher quality panels.
  • Loknar - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link

    Acer will have to do a lot to win me over. My company bought hundreds and now they are piling up in the corner, defect just after warranty expired. The Acers I'm talking about are centrinos and recent core duos. The construction is terrible. Those currently in use by my staff crashes (from overheating) when programmers are compiling applications. When you shake them it feels like old plastic of 1980's Toyotas, and often there are loose bolts inside.

    My company gave me are core2duo and I use it at home, removed the bottom casing and installed a cooling pad. It still crashes sometimes when my girlfriend plays tetris.

    The battery life and LCD display may seem ok in this lineup. But it is still unacceptable for me, give me a lower spec MacBook anytime. I had to get as far away as Acer as possible and got a MacBookPro, but a simple MacBook would have satisfied my office needs.
  • Foxy1 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    Did anyone happen to catch the score of the OU/Washington game?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    No, but I did go see the BYU/Washington game in person. It was awesome watching the Cougars pull off the win at the end. Despite all the complaints from WA fans, it's worth noting that they had something like three penalties the whole game, they didn't get called for the blatant holds on 4th and 10 during the final drive, and the refs also didn't call the illegal forward pass with one minute remaining where the QB was a yard over the line of scrimmage. After such a demoralizing loss, it's hardly a surprise that they rolled over and played dead for OU.

    Go Cougars!
  • Donkey2008 - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link

    There was no excuse for the unsportsmanlike penalty. BYU fans can point a finger at other calls (which apparantly only they saw) leading up to the touchdown, but the referee influenced the outcome of the game. End of story. UW should have been kicking an EP, not a 35-yard FG.

    The more BYU fans try to deflect that fact, the worse it makes the call look. Just say "hey, it was a bad call. We got lucky" and the whole incident will be over.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, September 19, 2008 - link

    Okay, TOTALLY 100% OFF TOPIC:

    If you throw a ball 25 feet into the air after a TD, that's a penalty. The only people who think it was a "bad call" are WA fans or people that don't like BYU. If you think it's a "bad rule" that should be changed, fine, but that's a different debate.

    I just loved Lou Holtz' commentary on ESPN: "He didn't throw the ball; he just raised his hands and the ball happened to be in them." LOL... That's as insightful as his repeated analysis of how great the Notre Dame team is always going to be.

    Think I'm making this stuff up? How about a little physics to back things up?

    http://www.truveo.com/Endzone-View-of-Locker-Throw...">hang time = 2.36 s - nope, he didn't just "toss it over his shoulder" (unless it mysteriously disappeared for 2.36 seconds)

    The ball is stopped at the apex, which is half the time, so:

    velocity final = vf = 0 m/s
    time = t = 1.18 s
    acceleration = a = -9.8 m/s2

    Solve for distance (height) = d = ??

    First use: vf = vi + a*t
    vi = velocity initial

    0 m/s = vi + (-9.8 m/s2)*(1.18 s)
    0 m/s = vi - 11.564 m/s
    vi = 11.564 m/s

    Now use: vf^2 = vi^2 + 2*a*d

    (0 m/s)^2 = (11.564 m/s)^2 + 2*(-9.8 m/s^2)*(d)
    0 m^2/s^2 = (133.726096 m^2/s^2) + (-19.6 m/s^2)*d
    -133.726096 m^2/s^2 = (-19.6 m/s^2)*d
    (-133.726096 m^2/s^2)/(-19.6 m/s^2) = d
    d = 6.82276 m

    Don't know about you guys, but lofting a football 22.3843 feet into the air seems pretty "high" to me. That's the equivalent of throwing a football (at a 30 degree angle) around 25 yards - perhaps not the hardest he could throw it, but certainly not an "accident" or "toss".

    Is the rule bad? Perhaps. If so, it's up to the schools to make the change, not the refs. If you want to blame someone other than Locker, don't blame the officials; blame PAC-10 and the other conferences that told the officials to clamp down on post-TD celebrations.

    To reiterate: I was *at* the game. How many penalties went against WA? Three, two of which came on the final drive. (Okay, four if you count the offsides call on the final kickoff after their blocked PAT.) How many against BYU? Seven. This wasn't a dirty game, but WA didn't have a single false start or offsides called against them (there are always a couple), not a single hold (again, there are always a few of those), and yet they're going to blame the refs!?

    Here's another completely blown call for you: one minute remaining, ball is on BYU's 41 yard line. Locker completes a pass to the 29 yard line for a first down... except he threw the ball from the 39 yard line (two *YARDS* over the line of scrimmage)!

    Okay, that's the last I'm saying about this in the comments of a laptop review. Who in the heck brought up a football discussion anyway? Someone needs to get their priorities straight....

    [END OFF TOPIC DISCUSSION]
  • bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    how did you bench company of heroes? fraps? the built in test? some custom test?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now