Compatibility

Google is in a unique position to test the compatibility of something like a browser, given that the company has servers that spend their days indexing the entirety of the internet. You’d think it wouldn’t be too hard to pull from that index and produce a reasonable set of test cases for Chrome.

Plugins like Flash just work, which is nice, but not all websites play nicely with Chrome. Take a look at NVIDIA’s Force Within download page:

The download box won’t load and you’re out of luck with Chrome. Fortunately the NVIDIA example is the exception, for the most part Chrome has been working just fine for me. How about all of you?

Chrome passes the Acid2 test, but gets a 74/100 in the Acid3 test. That’s compared to 78/100 for Safari, 13/100 for IE7 (Wikipedia lists it as a 14 but I was unable to get anything higher than 13) and 71/100 for FF3.


At least Chrome does better than IE7 in the Acid3 test:


Nice

Final Words

In short - I like Chrome. It’s small, quick, efficient, and my only major complaint is that there’s no OS X version yet. As much as I hate having an overly crowded market, it’s the results of this sort of competition that truly beget innovation.

Google has played nice in the market for some time, but its competitors can’t stand idle. Bring on IE8, FF4 and Safari 4, because honestly there is a lot of sense in some of the features Chrome brings to the table.

Performance
POST A COMMENT

106 Comments

View All Comments

  • dickeywang - Thursday, September 4, 2008 - link

    I just hope that they can provide a Linux version that can render the web pages as fast as those browsers in Windows. Reply
  • jvaudio - Thursday, September 4, 2008 - link

    I absolutely hate how tech sites give Google a free pass on their behaviors.

    Taken from Joe Wilcox:

    I've just got to excerpt from this document: "When you type URLs or queries in the address bar, the letters you type are sent to Google so the Suggest feature can automatically recommend terms or URLs you may be looking for."

    Can you say keylogger? What else could "the letters you type" mean?

    Now make sure you read this paragraph at least twice:

    "Your copy of Google Chrome includes one or more unique application numbers. These numbers and information about your installation of the browser (e.g., version number, language) will be sent to Google when you first install and use it and when Google Chrome automatically checks for updates. If you choose to send usage statistics and crash reports to Google, the browser will send us this information along with a unique application number as well."
    WTH? Application numbers? Well, well, browsing is a whole lot less anonymous with Chrome. Why is there no uproar? Microsoft got hammered by the news media in 2001 because Windows XP appeared to send user identifiable activation numbers during setup. Google is identifying your browser with a unique number. What would prevent that number from being associated with a Google ID for Gmail or related service?

    This is a good read on the details of how Google is the Ultimate Big Brother:
    http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/web_service...">http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/...r/chrome...

    With that said, I do use it, but as my third browser. I use IE8 and Opera as my main browsers. I use IE for checking email, banking, grad school, and light surfing. I use Opera for everything else. It is a fantastic browser. I was very excited about Firefox 3 because I haven't used it in years (because it sucked hard after 1.5). It works EXTREMELY poorly on Vista 64 bit. I have completely abandoned its use and it has been replaced by Chrome. If Google can show that it can clean up security issues in a timely manner, I intend to use it on occasion and leave it on my system.
    Reply
  • nerdynick - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    Most innovative new browser features debut in Opera first, ie tabs,
    speed dial, mouse gestures, etc.

    For that reason alone Opera should have been included.
    Reply
  • aeternitas - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    Very poor not to have included Opera. Reply
  • crimson117 - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    quote:

    Chrome launches very quickly, bested only by IE7 in start time


    Had you opened IE7 already since your last reboot? I opened IE7 for the first time after a reboot, and it took ~3 seconds (Wolfdale 3.0GHz, 4GB ram, Vista). Then I closed IE7, waited a minute, and opened IE7 again and it was nearly instant (<1.0s)
    Reply
  • Donkey2008 - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    I've been coming to Anandtech for years now and I always expect a decent technical rundown of software like this. Just because a home has a nice garden and new paint doesn't mean that all is right with the plumbing.

    Why didn't you guys notice that the browser is set to accept ALL cookies by default? Combine that with the DNS Pre-fetching (also on by default) and you have a dangerous combo. One wrong click and you'll have dozens of cookies installed on your machine from sites that you have never even visited (and how many will be a Google ad affiliate by chance?)

    Sorry, but Google is possibly the WORST company on the entire internet to trust when it comes to privacy and this browser wasn't released out of the sheer goodness of their own heart with no strings attached.

    My 2 cents.

    By the way, the Chrome interface is quite nice. I like the simplicity :-)
    Reply
  • crimson117 - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    1. Google Chrome does not behave well with Vista set to use large fonts.

    2. Chrome plus large vista fonts = this text box (the one I'm typing this comment into) is behaving oddly.

    3. Here are some opera memory numbers:
    Just anandtech: 31.4MB
    All 4: 92MB
    Closed 3: 89.9MB
    Reply
  • xoxor - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    While Firefox & IE run DHTML Lemmings fine - Chrome does not actually play the game. I've also run into the NVIDIA site glitch as well as a few other sites.

    The TOS also bother me. Additionally, until I understand more about what it is doing with cache (specifically "Safe Browsing" under \Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data) I'm not comfortable using it.
    Reply
  • roguerower - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    I'm probably just reiterating what everyone else has already said but I'm very disappointed that AT didn't test this new "Wonder Browser" vs. Opera. I switched from IE7 to Opera as a test run and within 10 minutes scrapped IE forever.

    Some interesting concepts...but some things look like they just took them from the O.
    Reply
  • Matt Campbell - Wednesday, September 3, 2008 - link

    So far my impressions are pretty good, but as Google stated their motto is "launch early and iterate", and I think they have a lot of iterations to go before Chrome will start wooing users away from the existing browsers. I agree with Ryan that the privacy statements in the terms of service worry me. I miss my mouse gestures from FF, my company webmail service still doesn't render properly in anything but IE, and Chrome tabs crashed on me several times on flash-heavy websites (though I could indeed kill that single tab without affecting the rest of the brower). It'll stay on my PC, but it will take a lot of changes to dethrone FF. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now