Display Quality, Continued

Besides contrast ratio, brightness levels, and color gamuts, the other metric we like to compare on displays is color accuracy. As always, we use a DTP-94/Monaco Optix XR colorimeter with Monaco Optix XR Pro and ColorEyes Display Pro software. ColorEyes Display Pro almost always generates a better score on laptop LCDs than Monaco Optix XR Pro. Worth noting however is that the color gamut generated by Monaco Optix is usually larger. It seems that Monaco Optix requires a certain color gamut level before it functions optimally, which may be why the ASUS G2P is the only laptop we've tested so far that scores better under Monaco Optix.


Laptop
Display Quality

Laptop
Display Quality

The performance generated by the Samsung LCD used in the P-6831 is lackluster, although it's not dramatically worse (or better) than most of the other laptop LCDs we've tested. What's particularly odd is how poorly the Dell XPS M1730 scores in color accuracy. Our best guess is that there might be some sort of dynamic contrast or software causing the conflict, but we never could generate anything approaching an acceptable result on the M1730.

The above results only compare color accuracy after calibration, however. Scores are much lower across the board prior to calibration. Here are the pre- and post-calibration detailed results for the P-6831 FX.


Display
Quality


Pretty much all of these results are surpassed by even the worst of the desktop LCDs we have tested in the past 18 months. We would really love to see better laptop LCDs; manufacturers, please see to it!

P-6831 FX LCD Quality Other Application Performance
Comments Locked

88 Comments

View All Comments

  • ToeJuice - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    Nevermind... overreacted to the first page... lol
  • bill3 - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    Would you make a gaming laptop your only machine? A 9600GT caliber GPU sounds nice now, but in just a few months as always it will be slipping way behind.

    It's hard enough keeping up to gaming specs on a desktop, seems to me a fixed spec laptop is always a losers choice for gaming.
  • gerf - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    I use my laptop for all computer uses outside of work. I consider it gaming able as well: Dell Vostro 1500 1.6GHz C2D, 8600m 512MB only DDR2, 2GB RAM, 85WHr battery. With the discounts of the day, 3 year warranty and a bag thrown in, it was about $1050.

    What mattered the most was that I get about 5 hours battery life when I'm just running moz, irc, IM, Thunderbird around the house.

    I'm not a Dell employee, but I have to say that this type of lapper could be grouped up there as a reasonable alternative for moderate gamers on the go.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    That sort of system is a standard laptop first and a gaming laptop second. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but if you really like games and want to be able to run at maximum detail, that type of system won't cut it. That's what I'm getting at in the conclusion: the need for balance as well as targeting what type of system you want. If you want long battery life, the 8800M notebooks are currently a poor choice. I'm still waiting to see the first notebooks with HybridPower, so that you can get both 3D performance *and* long battery life.
  • pmonti80 - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    For the kind of people who read anandtech, that laptop is not going to be their only computer. It's a second or third computer, like a desktop pc you can move or if you go to a LAN party, used for such things.

    And for the kind of people not reading anandtech this mobile equivalent of a 9600 GT is more that OK for a couple of years. At the native resolution of 1440x900 they would be able to play any game for 2 or more, just reducing the settings used as games demand more power (1440x900 is just a few less pixels than 1280x1024).

    Just my 2 cents.
  • iclicku - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    I actually bought this laptop to leave at my GF's place so that when I'm over there, I can play games and such. Plus my GF loves to use it as well. I already have a desktop at home and the specs are very similar to the laptop.
  • FXi - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    Nice review. It's very nice to see a notebook that enters the market at a kinder price point (even fully loaded it's far better than Dell or Alienware 17" gaming models).

    Drivers! Seriously anyone who isn't "working with" Nvidia hand in hand right now to get regular driver updates for mobile gaming machines is going to be out of this business when those updates start showing up. SLI absolutely requires serious regular driver updates, and the minute those updates stop (you stop getting supported) your SLI rig is not a single gpu rig in any future games. Kinda sad, eh?

    The TN panel is a bit of a compromise, but folks should seriously consider that the price for what you get is pretty good. One can always move up several thousand and not get dramatically more performance. A cpu upgrade would probably be the only thing most folks might consider paying more for.

    Well done :)
  • pmonti80 - Friday, March 28, 2008 - link

    It's a pitty that I live in spain and can't buy this notebook. Because I would buy it without a second thought if Gateway sold these here.
    Great for Lan's and as a Desktop Replacement. For a decent price.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now