abit IP35-Pro Specifications

abit IP35-Pro Specifications
Market Segment Enthusiast - $174.99
CPU Interface Socket T (Socket 775)
CPU Support LGA775-based Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Extreme, or Core 2 Quad Recommended
Chipset Intel P35 (MCH) Northbridge and ICH9R Southbridge
Front Side Bus Speeds Auto, 100 ~ 750 in 1MHz increments
Memory Speed DDR2 Auto, Six Ratios
PCIe Speeds Auto, 100MHz - 200MHz
PCI Speeds Locked at 33.33MHz
Core Voltage Auto, Base to 1.8000 in .0100 increments
CPU Clock Multiplier 6x ~ 12x, downward adjustable for Core 2, upward to 50 for Extreme
DRAM Voltage DDR2 Auto, 1.50V ~ 2.78V in .02V increments, 1.50V standard
DRAM Timing Control Auto, Manual - 9 DRAM Timing Options (tCL, tRCD, tRP, tRAS, tRFC+ 4 sub-timings)
DRAM Command Rate Auto, 1N, 2N
NB Voltage Auto, 1.25V ~ 1.72V in various increments
ICH Voltage Auto, 1.05V ~ 1.38V in various increments
ICHIO Voltage Auto, 1.50V ~ 2.00V in .05V increments
CPU VTT Voltage Auto, 1.20V to 1.57V in various increments
GTLRef 45% ~ 80% in 1% increments
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR3 DIMM Slots
Dual-Channel Configuration
Regular Unbuffered DDR2 Memory to 8GB Total
Expansion Slots 2 - PCIe x16 (1 - x16, 1 - x4 electrical)
1 - PCIe x1
3 - PCI Slot 2.3
Onboard SATA/RAID 6 SATA 3Gbps Ports - ICH9R
(RAID 0,1, 10, 5)
2 eSATA 3Gbps Port - JMicron JMB363
Onboard IDE 1 ATA133/100/66 Port (2 drives) - JMicron JMB363
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 12 USB 2.0 Ports - 4 I/O Panel - 8 via Headers
2 Firewire 400 Ports by TI TSB43AB22A - 2 via Header
Onboard LAN 2 - Realtek RTL8110SC - PCI Gigabit Ethernet controller
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC888 - 8-channel HD audio codec
Power Connectors ATX 24-pin, 8-pin ATX 12V
I/O Panel 1 x PS/2 Keyboard
1 x PS/2 Mouse
2 x SPDIF - Optical Out, Optical In
2 x eSATA
1 x Audio Panel
2 x RJ45
4 x USB 2.0/1.1
Fan Headers 6 - (1) CPU, (1) System, (4) Aux
Fan Control CPU, System, Aux Fan Control via BIOS/uGuru
BIOS Revision B.16
Board Revision 1.00

The abit IP35-Pro targets the enthusiast user, with an emphasis on BIOS features for those interested in overclocking the system. abit provides the standard laundry list of board options such as the JMicron JMB363 chipset for eSATA and IDE support, IEEE 1394 support from TI, decent onboard audio support from the Realtek ALC888, 12 USB ports, Intel Matrix RAID, and Gigabit LAN support from the ubiquitous Realtek RTL8110SC controller chipset. Both LAN ports run off the PCI bus but it is doubtful that most users will ever exceed their throughput rate of 735Mbps.

The board offers a very good mix of expansion slots although utilizing a CrossFire setup will create the physical loss of a PCI slot. We still recommend utilizing the 975X or X38 chipsets for CrossFire operation. The BIOS options for the IP35-Pro are good for a motherboard in this sector, and of course the board features abit's excellent µGuru technology. We ran a few early tests with the QX-9650 Yorkfield CPU and the board would POST and operated fine except for one problem. The CPU multiplier runs at 6X and will continue to do so until the next BIOS update. This a problem we have experienced with most of the P35 boards, and a BIOS code update to include full functionality for the Penryn family is all that's required.
abit IP35-Pro: Board Layout and Features abit IP35-Pro BIOS Overview and Software Features
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • Odeen - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    In this day and age, PCI LAN = fail.
    Dual PCI LAN = double fail.

    Realtek ANYTHING does not belong on a board that advertises itself as a "Pro"

    Whatever happened to the good old days where the south bridge had a MAC that just needed a PHY to have a network connection that was completely independent of other external buses? I know the ATI/AMD RD600 doesn't have a MAC and requires an external network adapter, the ICH9 has a gigabit MAC, and requires merely an Intel 82566 PHY chip to have a gigabit Ethernet connection.

    For that matter, who here uses dual NICs? Please raise your hands and tell me what you use them for. Seems like a waste of power to use a computer for internet connection sharing, in the day and age of $25 wireless routers....
  • Mekreluk - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    Right, so let me get this right.

    You give the IP35-Pro a gold award, and the DFI P35-TR2 a silver award?

    The IP35-Pro had bigger vDroop, reaches a lower FSB with a Quad and scores a mark above the DFI?

    I'm not disputing that it's a good board, after all it's cheaper than the DFI and has uGuru but these motherboards are for enthusiasts. The users who chuck the most expensive, best performing hardware into their online carts without a second thought.

    So, I'm thinking a Vauxhall Zafira should score more than a Lotus Elise because hey! It's slower, costs less and can fit 7 people in it.

    Add to that the fact the DFI P35 review walks all over the IP35-Pro one as it's also a more in depth guide into it's overclocking with the GTLREF settings etc.
  • yyrkoon - Friday, November 2, 2007 - link

    It has been said that the vdroop on these boards is associated with inexperienced users *not* using a different 12v rail for the 4 pin PCIe AUX power connection. The only vdroop I had with my IP35-E and E6550 @ 3.33Ghz was a very small MCH vdroop, which was easily corrected in the BIOS by bumping the MCH voltage up one notch. I am also using a Power supply that is known to work well with the IP35 series.

    The award for this board is well warranted in my opinion, and I cannot help but wonder exactly how stable that DFI PoS is, and how easy it is to setup. I could care less if it runs at a slightly higher external clock if it is not stable, or is extremely hard to set up. ANYONE with half a brain can setup the IP35 boards with a reasonable OC in about 1 minute, and these boards work 100% out of the box the way they are intended, and are dahmed stable(meaning I have not experienced a single BSoD, or crash since this board made it into my system).

    As for the 'bad' ethernet performance, ANYONE who is serious about their ethernet performance is going to be using either an Intel Pro 1000 desktop adapter, or an Intel pro 1000 server adapter, and not some PoS onboard ethernet. As for why dual ports ? Maybe someone wants to run their desktop on multiple subnets ? Ive done it before . . . it can be great for remote booting. Now tying the GbE port(s) to the PCI bus is a serious no no, I will agree with that.

    Let me guess . ..you own said DFI P35-TR2 board ? If you like it, fine use it , be happy and quite whining about some review that is 'dis'n' your motherboard . . . and go wonder how serious overclockers on the ABIT forums have hit 4Ghz + with their E6600's on this board.
  • Mekreluk - Sunday, November 4, 2007 - link

    I didn't say the board doesn't warrant the review score, as I said, I know it's a good board but there are users on XS who have gotten a higher clock out of the P35-T2R after migrating from the IP35-Pro.

    How stable the DFI is? Very stable, it's been described as rock stable by C-N, BrotherEsau, Solarfall who are 3 regular posters in the thread over at XS. I didn't actually own the P35-TR2 when I posted my comment before, I don't actually currently have a PC due to having my PC343B custom modified for a dual water cooling loop. I made my observation on real end user experiences with the board. I've since received my DFI board though.

  • Bozo Galora - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    First of all, these AT mobo reviews are always way late, with endless forum posts by Mr. Key about hourly "bios updates" being emailed to him by manuf. Can't they test their own boards - why do they need a reviewer to spot a bug? Abit doesnt know about Vdroop??? Dont they test firewire thruput?
    I'm sick of motherboards that work 90%.
    And I dont want to hear about buggered up bios for months - when you get a "bought in store" retail board, then review it, other than that, stifle yourself.

    You practically sleep with these guys - where's your objectivity? Its not your job to help them bring out a working board. I mean, like they need Gary Key for input - what are THEIR engineers doing all this time?
    And why is it after all these years that mobo makers still cannot create a lousy <1MB bios that works right out of the gate.
    They are still shoving crap out the door and hoping it flies - eventually.

    I say Gary Key must go - get someone who doesnt put out all those "teaser" blurbs. Maybe that's one reason why you only have 422 members online at this moment. Its so annoying.

    And FWIW: Abit is skipping the X38
    http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?%20th...">http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?%20th...
  • Heidfirst - Friday, November 2, 2007 - link

    "And FWIW: Abit is skipping the X38
    http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?%20th...">http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?%20th...
    No, they aren't - in fact IX38 QuadGT DDR2 stock arrived in the UK today.

    As for the dual PCI LAN there is a reason & it's a deliberate design decision - it's upto you whether it's right or wrong for you but as Gary said it won't affect the vast majority of people as it's still waaay faster than domestic broadband & also faster than a single hard drive can cope with.
    By using PCI LAN on the Pro(the IP35-E & plain IP35 use PCI-E LAN) it means that you can use the x16 PCI-E slot & the x4 PCI-E slot & still have another x1 PCI-E slot active (the last PCI-E lane on the chipset is used for the JMicron) for use with a wifi card, soundcard etc.
    Other boards from competitors disable other PCI-E slots when the x16 & x4 are used to their capacity.
    Maybe not so important now when there are still relatively few x1 PCI-E cards available (although 1 of course is abit's AirPace wifi) but in a year or 2?
  • crabnebula - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    One of the negatives I've seen about this board in other reviews is its Firewire throughput, which is considerably slower than competitors.

    See here for example: http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/07/12/abit_i...">http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/07/12/abit_i...

    This might be of importance to some people who use FireWire devices.
  • Heidfirst - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    there was a BIOS released after that which supposedly addressed the firewire transfer rate issue.
  • crimson117 - Thursday, November 1, 2007 - link

    At the start of the review you mentioned a problem with the heatsinks.

    Is abit planning to fix this? It sounds like kind of a serious thing that the heatsinks don't work properly out of the box in 2 of your 3 boards.

    quote:

    Engineering can only take you so far, and unfortunately the execution is not always up to standards. Out of the three boards we tested, two had problems with the heatsink properly making contact on the PWM components and the MCH heatsink was not completely flat. A quick Google search will lead you to a forum user who "fixed" this problem. We tried it on one of our boards and noticed the MCH temperatures dropped 5C while PWM temperatures dropped over 9C when overclocking the board.
  • Gary Key - Saturday, November 3, 2007 - link

    We have abit to screen their production process and to improve this design. We had one board that the PWM heatsink refused to make decent contact with the components and the other two were close to perfect. It could be manufacturing variations in the heatsink design or just plain bad quality control.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now