Gaming
Three DX9-era games representing different gaming engines were used to test the performance of Kingston DDR3-1375 in real world gaming. There are more recent gaming titles available, but they are also DX9. We will update games in the memory test suite as soon as a selection of DX10 games with reliable benchmarks are available. At that time the memory test OS will also be moved to Vista.
The Far Cry - River demo was run for three loops and results in fps were averaged over the three runs.
Far Cry performs best with fast DDR2 memory on the P35 chipset, much as we expected. However, the performance of DDR3 on the P35 is much closer to DDR2 on the Asus P5K with the low latency Kingston DDR3. It is also important to note that both DDR3 and DDR2, even in slow DDR3 latencies, are faster than the fastest DDR2 on the P965.
DDR3-1333 reaches speeds almost the same as DDR2-1066 at 4-4-3 timings on the P35. Speeds above 1333 chart new performance territory for DDR3.
Quake 4 and the underlying engine have always proved to be very sensitive to improvements in memory bandwidth. This is amply demonstrated in these memory tests. Again in all cases DDR2 and DDR3 are faster on P35 than the fastest DDR2 on P965. The pattern is the same as in Far Cry but the differences are magnified in Q4. One interesting result is that the low-latency Kingston is now within 1 frame of DDR2 3-3-3 on P35 at both the overlap speeds of 800 and 1066. Kingston DDR3-1333 performance is at about the same speed at DDR2 4-4-3 at 1066 on the same P35 chipset. Speeds higher than 1333 again chart new performance territory.
We include Half-Life 2: Lost Coast as a representative of games that are less sensitive to improvements in memory bandwidth. Lost Coast is played through the Steam engine, where there is the constant worry, for a reviewer, that each new update of Steam will break your test benchmarks. Though the differences are not as dramatic, the pattern is exactly the same as the other two games. All P35 results are faster than the same fast DDR2 results on the P965. DDR2-800 3-3-3 and DDR2-1066 4-4-3 are the fastest in the overlap speeds on the P35 motherboard.
Low latency Kingston DDR3 is all but identical in results to fast DDR2 at both overlap speeds, showing the impact of lowered latency on DDR3 performance. 1333 and above results chart new performance territory, and the Low latency Kingston performance in these higher speeds certainly validates DDR3 as the performance memory for the future.
Three DX9-era games representing different gaming engines were used to test the performance of Kingston DDR3-1375 in real world gaming. There are more recent gaming titles available, but they are also DX9. We will update games in the memory test suite as soon as a selection of DX10 games with reliable benchmarks are available. At that time the memory test OS will also be moved to Vista.
The Far Cry - River demo was run for three loops and results in fps were averaged over the three runs.
| Far Cry- HOC River - 2.66GHz Frames Per Second - Higher is Better |
||||
| Memory | 800 | 1066 | 1333 | 1520 (380x7) |
| Kingston DDR3-1333 KHX11000D3LLK2 |
103.77 5-4-3-10 1.75V |
106.11 6-5-5-12 1.7V |
106.91 7-7-6-15 1.7V |
107.46 8-8-8-22 1.8V |
| Corsair DDR3-1066 CM3X1024-1066C7 |
103.39 6-6-6-15 1.5V |
105.87 7-7-7-20 1.5V |
106.70 9-9-9-25 1.5V |
- |
| DDR2 - P35 Corsair Dominator |
106.30 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
108.00 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
| DDR2 - P965 (10x266) Corsair Dominator |
101.26 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
103.04 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
Far Cry performs best with fast DDR2 memory on the P35 chipset, much as we expected. However, the performance of DDR3 on the P35 is much closer to DDR2 on the Asus P5K with the low latency Kingston DDR3. It is also important to note that both DDR3 and DDR2, even in slow DDR3 latencies, are faster than the fastest DDR2 on the P965.
DDR3-1333 reaches speeds almost the same as DDR2-1066 at 4-4-3 timings on the P35. Speeds above 1333 chart new performance territory for DDR3.
| Quake 4 - id Demo - 2.66GHz Frames Per Second - Higher is Better |
||||
| Memory | 800 | 1066 | 1333 | 1520 (380x7) |
| Kingston DDR3-1333 KHX11000D3LLK2 |
111.2 5-4-3-10 1.75V |
114.7 6-5-5-12 1.7V |
115.5 7-7-6-15 1.7V |
116.0 8-8-8-20 1.8V |
| Corsair DDR3-1066 CM3X1024-1066C7 |
107.9 6-6-6-15 1.5V |
111.8 7-7-7-20 1.5V |
113.2 9-9-9-25 1.5V |
- |
| DDR2 - P35 Corsair Dominator |
112.5 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
115.7 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
| DDR2 - P965 (10x266) Corsair Dominator |
106.00 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
109.7 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
Quake 4 and the underlying engine have always proved to be very sensitive to improvements in memory bandwidth. This is amply demonstrated in these memory tests. Again in all cases DDR2 and DDR3 are faster on P35 than the fastest DDR2 on P965. The pattern is the same as in Far Cry but the differences are magnified in Q4. One interesting result is that the low-latency Kingston is now within 1 frame of DDR2 3-3-3 on P35 at both the overlap speeds of 800 and 1066. Kingston DDR3-1333 performance is at about the same speed at DDR2 4-4-3 at 1066 on the same P35 chipset. Speeds higher than 1333 again chart new performance territory.
| Half Life 2 - Lost Coast - 2.66GHz Frames Per Second - Higher is Better |
||||
| Memory | 800 | 1066 | 1333 | 1520 (380x7) |
| Kingston DDR3-1333 KHX11000D3LLK2 |
108.0 5-4-3-10 1.75V |
109.1 6-5-5-12 1.7V |
109.5 7-7-6-15 1.7V |
109.5 8-8-8-22 1.8V |
| Corsair DDR3-1066 CM3X1024-1066C7 |
107.0 6-6-6-15 1.5V |
108.4 7-7-7-20 1.5V |
108.7 9-9-9-25 1.5V |
- |
| DDR2 - P35 Corsair Dominator |
108.5 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
109.5 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
| DDR2 - P965 (10x266) Corsair Dominator |
103.9 3-3-3-9 2.25V |
104.9 4-4-3-11 2.3V |
- | - |
We include Half-Life 2: Lost Coast as a representative of games that are less sensitive to improvements in memory bandwidth. Lost Coast is played through the Steam engine, where there is the constant worry, for a reviewer, that each new update of Steam will break your test benchmarks. Though the differences are not as dramatic, the pattern is exactly the same as the other two games. All P35 results are faster than the same fast DDR2 results on the P965. DDR2-800 3-3-3 and DDR2-1066 4-4-3 are the fastest in the overlap speeds on the P35 motherboard.
Low latency Kingston DDR3 is all but identical in results to fast DDR2 at both overlap speeds, showing the impact of lowered latency on DDR3 performance. 1333 and above results chart new performance territory, and the Low latency Kingston performance in these higher speeds certainly validates DDR3 as the performance memory for the future.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
42 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
We ran a complete test suite at DDR3-1500 7-7-7-15. Not surprisingly ALL of the results were a bit higher than those reported at 1520 9-8-8-22.As a result we will be replacing the 1520 results on all performance charts with the higher 1500 7-7-7 results. Give us about 15 minutes to complete the update. Enjoy!
photoguy99 - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
It would be a good accomplishment for Barcelona to come out and surpass Core2 performance that wowed the world last year.But how many of these can Barcelona beat:
1) Original Core2 Quad at 2.66Mhz (probably what they were aiming for)
2) Add P35 chipset for 5-10% performance increase
3) Add DD3 at 1333Mhz or higher with low latencies for 5-10% increase
4) Add Penryn core for 5-10% performance increase at same clock speed
5) Penryn releases at 3.2 Ghz, add another 10% increase
When is the pain gonna stop for AMD?
It seems by this fall the Intel platform is going to be a lot faster that the original Core2 or Core2 quad releases.
defter - Friday, May 25, 2007 - link
Since Intel has already demonstrated air-cooled 3.33GHz Penryn based quad cores, and desktop Penryn based CPUs will use 1333MHz FSB and support half multipliers, I guess that desktop Penryn based quad core CPUs can be launched at least at 3.33-3.5GHz if necessary.
TA152H - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
OK, this post really irritates me.You think AMD started design on the Barcelona last year? How else could you possibly say they were aiming for the 2.66 Core 2 before it was even released if this wasn't true? Good grief, think!
The P35 most certainly does NOT add 5-10% application performance. Maybe in specific applications you will see something like this, but overall, it's not that high.
DDR3 at 1333 isn't adding much of anything right now. 5-10%???? Where are you getting these numbers from? In fact, in every gaming benchmark they ran, it was either slower or the same as the DDR2-1066. 5-10% my ass.
Penryn numbers are also made up, it would be extremely optimistic for 5-10% increase in IPC for most applications. Maybe a few will, but broadly, it's probably not true, and absolutely speculative.
Hmmmm, going from 3.0 GHz they have out now, to 3.2 GHz is 10%? I think it's more like 6.67%.
In short, all your assumptions are either, at best speculative, or at worst, just wrong.
Will DDR3 timings go down? Of course, but so will DDR2 since that's the dominant memory. Considering the changes to the Barcelona memory controller, I think you can expect a pretty substantial improvement there, but we won't know until we see it. A lot of stuff we won't know until we see it.
The big thing that bothers me is AMD still has not fully implement memory disambiguation, and while the scheduling of loads is improved to P6 levels, I'm not sure if it's enough. I'm also not crazy about their substantial x87 implementation, as it's a deprecated technology and more and more becoming dead weight. It's not even part of x86-64.
So, I'm not saying Barcelona will be better or worse, we'll see soon enough, but the reasons you give are, at best, specious, and at worst pure nonsense.
yacoub - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
I would guess they would aim for 20-25% improvement over last year's core2duo so somewhere around 3-4 of your 5 should be the level of Barcelona performance if it works out. In that case since I don't think you won't see all 5 of those combined this year, especially at a competitive price-point I think Barcelona still has a chance. =)Anonymous Freak - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
One of my big gripes with the DDR3 reviews so far, which were the same when DDR2 first came out, is the direct comparison of same-bus-speed results. Of *COURSE* DDR3 at 800 MHz will be slower than DDR2 at 800 MHz. As this review shows, even the best DDR3 timings are slower than the best DDR2 timings.But, that's not what DDR3 is designed to do. It's designed to have higher latency in exchange for significantly higher bus speeds, as this test shows. You should be comparing the DDR3-1333 results with the DDR2-800 or 1066 results.
Just as when DDR2 came out, it had much higher latency than DDR1, but faster bus speeds. Try comparing a top of the line DDR2 rig to a top of the line DDR1 rig now. (Say AMD AM2 vs. 939.) The faster bus speed of the DDR2 rig will just blow away the DDR1 rig, regardless of how good the DDR1 timings are. The same will be true with DDR3. Faster timings will come, as will faster bus speeds. The two will cause DDR3 to completely dominate even the fastest overclocked DDR2. Just look at this review, we have fast, but *within spec* DDR3 performing the same as the ultimate in overclocked DDR2. Just wait until we have the equivalent ultra-high-end DDR3 running at a *fully within spec* 1600 Mhz with 5-3-3 timings; and we'll probably see overclocked settings even higher.
lopri - Friday, May 25, 2007 - link
I'm afraid that your assertion is not quite the reality. AM2 CPU's memory controller has never been up to the level of Socket 939 CPU's. Under the same configuration sans memory, Socket 939 rig will always win over Socket AM2 rig.takumsawsherman - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
I doubt you will actually see a significant difference between DDR and DDR2 running on otherwise similar chipsets. It wasn't very difficult to find 2-2-2-5-1 or 2-2-2-6 latencies with DDR memory. Even now, I am finding it hard to consistently source DDR2 for a reasonable price that has a reasonably low latency. But if you were to take 2-2-2-5-1 DDR and 3-4-3-9 DDR2 module pairs and run them with similar chipsets, with the same processors, you may in fact get some victories for DDR in your benchmarks.Bandwidth isn't everything. For some tasks, latency is far more important. Therefore, it is vitally important for someone to actually test real world scenarios and publish results. That way, people can save their money for an upgrade that might have a chance at improving their performance.
bobsmith1492 - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
Don't forget... latency is not just the CAS number; it is a function of the clock speed and the number of cycles of latency. The overall latency time is the important part. DDRII 800MHz at CAS3 will have better latency than DDRI 400MHz at CAS2 (if either of those exist even...)Chunga29 - Thursday, May 24, 2007 - link
Those both exist as unofficial RAM speeds, though the DDR is harder to find these days.