High-Resolution Gaming Performance

For high-quality gaming performance, we also tested at 1600x1200 with 4xAA /8xAF. As just about anyone familiar with current games can tell you, benchmarking with a single high-end graphics card at these stressful settings will make just about any recent game GPU limited. That brings up one of the flaws with Intel's 975X chipset as it does not "officially" support NVIDIA SLI and these users will have to look for another solution. At this time that solution is the 7950GX2.

This card works fine on the 975X chipset except for a couple of anomalies in our test scores on the ASUS board that is under investigation currently. The charts below only includes single GPU performance using a 7900 GTX currently, but you can refer to our Conroe Buyers Guide results to see the performance improvements that SLI/CrossFire and a E6700 bring to the table. We will update our results with the 7950GX2 shortly and will have ATI CrossFire results in our next 975X review.

Half Life 2 - Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance - Quake 4

Gaming Performance - Serious Sam II

If you're serious about gaming at a high resolution with all the eye candy enabled, you will most certainly want to run a multi-GPU configuration (with NVIDIA's 7950 GX2 counting in our book as a multi-GPU solution). Looking specifically at the Abit board, its relative positioning did not change at the higher resolution settings. The spread among these motherboards is extremely minor with differences up to 1% at most due to our GPU limitation. Really, you would still be hard pressed to tell the difference between these boards in gaming performance.

Quick Take

Our preview of the Abit AW9D-MAX now shows a motherboard capable of living up to its heritage. In fact, this is probably the best performing Abit board we have tested since the IC7-MAX3 board that was one of our all time favorite Intel 875 boards. While we noticed a few minor issues with the BIOS during a rigorous test schedule, we have to state once again that the overall performance of the board is extremely impressive at this time. However, our enthusiasm is curtailed by the layout and expansion options on the board. While the minimalist and almost legacy free nature of the board may appeal to some, we found the lack of useable PCI slots to be a major drawback during operation with this board. We did come to accept this limitation as we found the on-board audio solution to be very good for most purposes and accepted the fact that this board would probably not be used in a home theater setup. That still does not excuse Abit for not including more PCI slots or at least changing the location of the single slot provided.

If the typical enthusiast utilizes a CrossFire arrangement then you lose both a PCI Express X1 slot and the only PCI slot. This will probably not be acceptable to most enthusiasts as that PCI slot usually contains an aftermarket sound card or possibly a TV tuner card among other things. Even with a single PCI slot open your choices are still limited if you want to use the system as a media station unless you upgrade to a PCI Express based TV tuner card or plan on utilizing the on-board audio solution. Our other issue has to do with the location of the floppy connector (it could just go away in our opinion) and the 4-pin 12V molex connector (needed for CrossFire) at the bottom of the board next to the audio max connector. The location of the first two SiL3132 SATA ports could be debated but we did not have any issues in using the ports if they were plugged in before we installed our Creative X-FI card. The same holds true for the first two Intel ICH7R SATA ports as our ATI X1900XT card almost blocked these two ports.


We do commend Abit on providing Dolby Master Studio support via the Realtek ALC-882M, dual Gigabit Ethernet controllers that use the PCI-E interface, an e-SATA port, a very effective silent OTES 2 cooling system, and their impressive µGuru technology for overclocking and full system monitoring/control capabilities. Abit has made great improvements in their BIOS capabilities since we last reviewed a motherboard from them. They ensure us we will have a public release BIOS shortly so we can provide a full report on the board's capability and compatibility with a host of components. We found the current overclocking capabilities to be excellent for a 975X based motherboard and stability at the maximum overclocks were superb. We expect continued refinement of the BIOS along with additional performance and overclocking improvements in the near future. It appears after a couple of years of disappointments that Abit has finally delivered a board worthy of the MAX name; we just wish they would have maxed out the PCI slots also.

Standard Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • johnsonx - Saturday, September 9, 2006 - link

    Thanks Gary. Those look interesting; I don't imagine they're overly effective given complete the lack of airflow behind the mainboard in 99.9% of systems. However I suppose just the additional radiative area is enough; in most system layouts they'll be near the upper edge of the mainboard, so convection will carry the heat into the air flow around the power supply and back fan(s).

    Presumably Abit didn't put them back there just to amuse themselves.

  • hibachirat - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Thanks Gary, but...i could have sworn that i saw strips like that on the back of my 775i65 . I didn't pay them any attention...or maybe it was it the motherboard i installed the week before--a Gigabyte. Crap, now i have to disassemble and look...
  • Gary Key - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Pictures will be up later this evening. Sorry about the delay but we had a technical issue.
  • hibachirat - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Yeah, I wanted to see that too. Plus maybe a night shot or mpeg of the disco diodes in action. :-p
    Seriously Abit, scrap the light show and give me back my old school serial and parallel ports! Once or twice a year I need my PC to talk to old hardware. And one PCI slot? This isn't a mATX board.
  • StrangerGuy - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Drop the multipier to 7x when testing mobo overclockability. Think for the E6300 users, besides you may hit the CPU ceiling before the mobo one with 9x.
  • Gary Key - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    We dropped the X6800 down to 8X and again to 6X. As stated our board and bios combination would not post past 460FSB. Abit is getting near 480 in their labs now and we hope to see a new bios spin in the next couple of days for our board. The same limitation holds true with our E6300/6400 processors, very stable up to 448FSB at this time but we hit a hard lock at 460FSB. I will provide an update once the new bios arrives.
  • imaheadcase - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Anyone remember top of the line boards used to cost less than $150?

    These boards are way to expensive, the preminum your paying for a board to OC kinda defeats the purpose of OC to get better performance for cheap imo.
  • mostlyprudent - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    It's all about market share. Even in the good-ole days (6/8 months ago) of AMD 939 and nVidia nForce4, the top boards occassionally debuted above $200, but did not stay there long. 975X chipset based boards were ridiculously priced even when there was no real reason to choose the platform. We NEED more competition!
  • GoatMonkey - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Top of the line boards for a long time didn't include decent sound, network, usb, multiple hard drive controllers with raid capability. You can still get a good board for less than $150, but they sometimes cut some of the high end features that are so nice to have.
  • Jedi2155 - Friday, September 8, 2006 - link

    Same with the DFI Lanparty NF4-Ultra only $130 for pretty much everything you listed along with extra's. SLI was $160 or so.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now