Test Setup

Performance Test Configuration
Processor: AM2 4800+ (X2, 2.4GHz, 1MB Cache per core)
RAM: 2 x 1GB Corsair Twin2x2048-8500C5
Tested at DDR2-800 3-3-3 2.2V to 2.3V
Hard Drive(s): Maxtor MaXLine III 7L300S0 300GB SATA2 (16MB Buffer)
Hitachi 250GB SATA2 enabled (16MB Buffer)
System Platform Drivers: NVIDIA - 9.34
ATI - LAN, Audio, SMBus drivers as required
Video Cards: 1 x EVGA 7900GTX - All Standard Tests
2 x EVGA 7900GTX - SLI
1 x ATI X1900XT - ATI Standard Tests (for Reference)
2 x ATI x1900XT (Master + Standard) - CrossFire
Video Drivers: NVIDIA 91.31
ATI Catalyst 6.4
CPU Cooling: AMD FX62 Heatpipe AM2 Cooler
Zalman CNPS9500 AM2
Power Supply: OCZ PowerStream 520W
Motherboards: ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe
Epox MF570SLI
ATI Crossfire Express AM2 Reference
Foxconn C51XEM2AA
Gigabyte GA-M59SLI-S5
Biostar TForce 590-SLI
MSI K9N SLI Platinum
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2

Test conditions were maintained the same, as much as possible, over the platforms tested. For better comparison standard test results (1280x1024) were run with a single NVIDIA 7900GTX on all platforms. A single ATI X1900XT was also tested at standard resolutions on the ATI Reference board. Consider this result a sanity check for single card performance and Crossfire. It should not be directly compared to other test results. Since SLI and Crossfire are not yet interchangeable, 1600x1200 4xAA/8xAF SLI was run on the NVIDIA-based boards with a pair of 7900GTX. 1600X1200 4xAA/8xAF Crossfire was run on the ATI using an X1900 XT Master + Single Crossfire. All results are reported in our charts and color-coded for easier identification of results.

AM2 benchmarking used Corsair PC-8500 (DDR2-1066) 2GB kit at 3-3-3 timings at around 2.2V. In recent months the memory market has moved from a 1GB kit to a 2BG kit being the common memory configuration. Our new DDR2 test standard will therefore be 2GB and we used the 2GB DDR memory for best comparison.

Epox: Overclocking & Memory General Performance & 3D Graphics
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Missing Ghost - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    yep the choice of I/O ports on the back panel is pretty poor
  • Larso - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    Perhaps someone should clarify this for me. I have been noticing how there is a growing interest in how the motherboard makers have done the power conversion for the CPU. Why has this become an issue to investigate?

    I don't think there was a similar focus on the power converters for the netburst chips, which I believe soaked a lot more juice than these AMD chips. I believe they managed to deliver stable power to the netbursts without needing an 8 phase converter cooled by heatpipes??

    I'm fearing that the motherboard producers will start to create extravagant and foolishly designed converters to please the reviewers. I believe there is no good reason to go for an 8 phase design, when a 4 phase would do the job, considering the money that can be spend on each phase. And that ASUS need to cool the converter by heatpipe seems to indicate that the convertion have a bad effeciency, is this really a step forward?

    I really enjoy reading more about the technical solutions on the motherboards, but it just seems to me that the power converter should be less of an issue now, than with the power hungry netburts?
  • Operandi - Friday, June 30, 2006 - link

    A 8 phase design is more efficient then a 4 phase, not less.
  • Missing Ghost - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    It seems to me that the heatpipes are more for cooling the chipset in fact.
  • erwos - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    What WiFi chipset does it use? "It has WiFi" is not terribly precise.

    -Erwos
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    The WiFi chip used on the Asus WiFi module is Realtek RTL8187L. The Features have been updated to reflect this.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    Asus refers to the Wi-Fi in specifications as "WiFi Home USB wireless module supporting IEE 802.11 b/g". There is no mention at all of the supporting chip. The module is attached to the motherboard and the chip is loacated behind heatpipes. We can't read the model number, but the logo is clearly Realtek.
  • highlnder69 - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    On page 8 under Half Life 2 - SLI Gaming Performance, I think that the Asus Single/SLI results are labeled incorrectly. It's currently showing the Single card configuration with the highest FPS results and the SLI with the lowest.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    You are correct, the labels were reversed. They are now corrected.
  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, June 28, 2006 - link

    Someone needs to teach the idiots at Asus about how to design the proper motherboard layout. With an SLI setup with dual width cards, there's no PCI-E slots available.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now