Intel has disclosed today that it will halt further development of its small form factor Next Unit of Compute (NUC) PCs. The tech giant expects its partners to take over and keep serving markets served by its NUC systems as it focuses on much more profitable chips businesses. 

"We have decided to stop direct investment in the Next Unit of Compute (NUC) Business and pivot our strategy to enable our ecosystem partners to continue NUC innovation and growth," a statement by Intel reads. "This decision will not impact the remainder of Intel’s Client Computing Group (CCG) or Network and Edge Computing (NEX) businesses. Furthermore, we are working with our partners and customers to ensure a smooth transition and fulfillment of all our current commitments – including ongoing support for NUC products currently in market."

Intel entered PC business with its ultra-compact NUC desktops in 2013, around the time it exited motherboards market. Initially, the company only targeted SOHO market with its NUC barebones and PCs, but eventually it greatly expanded its NUC range with systems aimed at corporate users that need things like remote management and appropriate support, and even gaming machines. 

Intel's NUC systems have garnered considerable popularity over the years, going toe-to-toe with similar offerings from established PC brands. While small form factor existed before the NUC (and will exist after), Intel's efforts to invigorate the space with its NUC designs were by and large successful, and a lot of the public experimentation we've seen done in the space over the last several years has come from Intel.

Nevertheless, Intel's OEM partners/rivals haven't been standing still during this time, and Intel has fallen behind in some areas. None of Intel's NUCs ever moved to being powered via USB Type-C (something ASUS already does), and Intel's more recent enthusiast NUCs have struggled to differentiate themselves from the competition. Overall, maintaining a wide variety of desktops and laptop platforms has been somewhat taxing (if not distracting) for Intel, whose primary focus lies in the semiconductor industry, rather than finished devices.

While Intel isn't citing any specific reasons in their decision to wrap up development of new NUC PCs, given the contracting PC market and the intense rivalry therein, we wouldn't be surprised if Intel was being rocked by the same market forces that have been putting a squeeze on other PC OEMs. Intel has already reduced its focus on NUCs in the recent years, never offering Performance versions of its 12th and 13th Generation NUCs – and we cannot say that that those machines were missed by the audience. Meanwhile, Intel's enthusiast-grade Extreme NUCs have evolved to be more like fully-fledged desktops rather than compact systems, getting farther and farther away from the NUC's tiny roots. And while the add-in card form-factor used by the NUC Extreme lineup has always looked promising, it is unclear whether they have even been a success for Intel.

Ultimately, as Intel has continued to shed and shutter non-core businesses, it is not entirely unexpected that Intel is axing its NUC program. In its place, the company is urging its OEM/ODM partners – whose bread and butter is designing and selling complete systems – to continue producing and innovating on compact machines for the small office/home office market, business clientele, and gamers. This leaves Intel free to refocus on the highly lucrative chip manufacturing business, as CEO Pat Gelsinger has made a priority over the past couple of years.

Intel's NUC will not be the first business divested by Intel in the recent years. To focus on development on leading-edge CPUs, GPUs, and other lucrative products, Intel left the NAND memory and SSD businesses, axed Optane SSDs, ceased development of notebook models, and even sold its prebuilt server business to MiTAC.

Comments Locked

39 Comments

View All Comments

  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, July 12, 2023 - link

    The NUC, like the ultrabook, came about because OEMS couldnt get it through their thick skulls how to design small hardware properly.

    And like the ultrabook, once OEMS were drug out of their caves and into the light, the NUC is being discontinued.
  • ingwe - Wednesday, July 12, 2023 - link

    Completely agree. Seems like with the thin hardware margins these days, OEMs need someone to take the risk to differentiate before they will jump onboard.
  • Foeketijn - Wednesday, July 12, 2023 - link

    It's a bit of a shame. I sold hundreds, and only had issues with a handfull.
    I'd have the same experience I think, with Lenovo/Dell/HP etc. SFF systems. But I am Always wary about their specific drivers/ is the memory dual channel/ can I use my preferred (fastish) SSD and memory etc. Those OEM's only go for reliability. But don't care for getting the max out of the least.
  • hubick - Wednesday, July 12, 2023 - link

    This sucks. I bought a lot of these (including the Xeon/Extreme model). They were good cuz you could actually get something resembling support for them - with actual Intel people in their support forums, firmware updates, etc. Thinking about alternatives just makes me feel tired that everything in the PC industry is just absolute rock bottom cheaply made unsupported trash these days.
  • Flying Aardvark - Thursday, July 13, 2023 - link

    I had the same experience with NUCs. Loved them. Weren't the best personal computer, but definitely versatile and well supported. I had engineers interact with me a few times on obscure issues that they tried to resolve. They'd work with you. Dell etc won't do this right. This hands the SFF market to Apple and ARM.

    It's a shame they couldn't have just kept 1 model around, the market does need a well-supported all-Intel (quality) SFF devices suited for digital signage, point of sale, office work, etc.
  • boozed - Thursday, July 13, 2023 - link

    "everything in the PC industry is just absolute rock bottom cheaply made unsupported trash these days"

    And even the expensive premium stuff resembles this...
  • PeachNCream - Friday, July 14, 2023 - link

    NUCs are huge anyway these days so it's rather good of Intel to do away with what has turned into a bloated SFF computer with nonstandard components. So long and no one will miss you.
  • timecop1818 - Sunday, July 16, 2023 - link

    name any similarly sized and priced competitors with thunderbolt and recent Intel CPUs. oh, that's right. there aren't any.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, July 17, 2023 - link

    Apparently Intel is now off that list too and given the company is aware of its sales volume and profitability, you should probably direct your sad attempt to set criteria in the name of being an aggressive keyboard warrior nerd toward the company you are mindlessly attempting to white knight in the face of their own product line announcements.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now