Razer Blade 14 (2023): Battery Performance

Note as of 06/21: We are currently re-testing battery life, have identified the problem, and will update this section as soon as we have the updated results.

While battery life is normally one of the key aspects of a notebook computer, gaming laptops are somewhat of an exception. Their high-power components often come with significant battery life penalties, which can tend to tether them to a desk. There are extreme cases of this, such as desktop replacement laptops, where they are meant to be plugged in basically all the time. Still, the Razer Blade 14 operates somewhere in the middle, with the Ryzen 9 7940HS offering up the highly efficient Zen 4 cores on a platter, and with efficiency a key variable to consider in a portable yet powerful notebook, Razer is aiming for a variable mixture of performance and power draw.

The Ryzen 7040HS refreshed Razer Blade 14 has just one battery configuration, with a 68 Wh lithium-ion battery. Razer does include a 2-year limited battery warranty should it fail or the condition becomes untenable. With a high-spec 14$ 240 Hz 2560 x 1600p (16:10) IPS panel, this will likely draw considerable power when gaming.

Razer claims that the Blade 14 (2023) can operate for up to 10 hours on just the battery, which is a good ballpark figure without including strenuous tasks or workloads to aim for. Razer and AMD's in-house testing also claims 9 hours of ADK video playback on the battery, which is impressive if replicable for users.

To test battery life moving forward, we set laptops at both maximum (100%) brightness and also ran tests at 50% brightness. Some laptops and notebooks have various brightness levels, e.g., the Razer Blade 14 (2023) has a maximum brightness of up to 500 nits. 

UL Procyon: Video Playback

UL Procyon Battery Benchmark: Video Playback - 50% Brightness

Using UL Procyon's video playback benchmark at both 100% and 50%, we can get a baseline figure of battery life based on the Razer Blade 14 (2023) gaming notebook, and at a later date, we can test apples-to-apples based on the same brightness level across each notebook we test. 

UL Procyon's video playback test incorporates multiple HD videos and runs until the battery is empty. This includes 1080p Youtube quality video at 30 fps, with square pixels at NTSC level, and VBR 2 pass bitrate encoding with 10 Mbps. 

At 100% brightness using the RTX 4070, we got a mediocre 149 minutes of battery life before it depleted. This is understandable, as a dedicated GPU will use much more power than an integrated one. At 50% brightness, we squeezed an additional 5 minutes of battery life over 100% brightness on the dGPU, meaning the 68.1 Wh battery lasted 154 minutes before draining.

Using the integrated graphics at 50%, we saw a large increase in video playback runtime using UL Procyon's video playback benchmark. We got 7 hours and 30 minutes, which is very reasonable for a battery of this size, constantly running video files.

UL Procyon: Office

The office productivity section of the UL Procyon battery life benchmark encompasses most of Microsoft Office's Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook applications to build a real-world picture of battery life in these types of applications. 

UL Procyon Battery Test, Office - 50% Brightness

Using UL Procyon's office-focused battery test, we got 107 minutes with the RTX 4070 active before the battery was fully depleted. The test itself is quite intensive, with numerous Microsoft Office 365-based workloads in the foreground and background. On the Radeon 780M, the battery lasted just over 7 hours, a much longer runtime for office-based applications and workloads. 

Our previous results had an issue where the notebook set UL Procyon to run from the RTX 4070. Still, as battery life testing takes considerably longer due to depleting and recharging, we're currently working on running more battery tests.

We will update this review with further battery tests in the coming days.

F1 2022 Benchmark Loop: 1600p, High Settings, 50% Brightness

F1 2022 Loop, 1600p, High Settings, 50% Brightness - Battery Deplete Test

To measure real-world battery drain when gaming, we ran F1 2022 at 1600p at high settings and put on a benchmark loop with the battery at 100% and unconnected from the mains. At this time, we start the benchmark and wait until the battery completely depletes.

As is expected, gaming uses more system resources in general and runs both the processor and graphics card intensively, depending on the resolution and settings. In our test, we got 79 minutes of game time before the battery died, which isn't a discredit to battery life or longevity; it's just how it is with desktop replacements and general gaming notebooks.

Even the most efficient of gaming notebooks will require users to either be tethered to a desk and plugged in while gaming or, at the very least, provide mobile gaming without being tethered for short periods of time before they need reconnecting to the mains. This is a notable trait and trade-off with virtually all gaming notebooks and even non-gaming notebooks with discrete mobile graphics chips.

Charging Time

The Razer Blade 14 (2023) notebook includes a compact yet hefty in weight 230 watt AC adapter. The charging cable attached to the power brick/charger is a premium-feeling black braided cable, adding style and quality to the overall package. The braided cable itself isn't too thick, but it's thick enough to add a bit of structure so that it doesn't fray or damage the internal wiring if rubbed against hard surfaces over a prolonged period.

Another point of note with Razer's 230 W AC adapter is that it uses a Razer proprietary connector, which does make it hard to obtain another charger in the unfortunate case that a user loses or misplaces it. The end of the adapter that plugs into the Razer Blade 14 itself has a 90° angled connector, which adds basic yet welcomed cable management. It also plugs into the notebook in both orientations.

Battery Charge Time: 0% to 100%

Using a combination of a high-powered 230 W AC power adapter and a modestly sized 68.1 Wh battery, the Razer Blade 14 (2023) with AMD's Ryzen 7940HS mobile processor charged from 0% to 100% in 99 minutes, which is a fantastic result all things considered.

Razer Blade 14 (2023): Thermal Performance

Putting plenty of premium parts into a 17.99 mm thin gaming notebook like the Razer Blade 14 is challenging, especially in notebooks with limited cooling. Razer uses their patented full vapor chamber cooling solution on the Blade 14, which combines dual 67-bladed fans which suck air in from the front and push it out of the vents on the rear, or bottom of the notebook, depending on how you look at it.

The vapor chamber design, as Razer states, allows heat to move quickly and freely for optimum efficiency, and that's important when you put components in, such as the premium NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (140 TGP). We know that Zen 4 for desktops do run quite warm, but with the Ryzen 7940HS 8C/16T processor limited to a TDP of 54 W, and combining that with the superb performance and power efficiency of the Zen 4 cores, it's a recipe for success, at least on paper.

Using our FLIR thermal imaging camera to take photos after a 1hr loop of the F1 2022 benchmark, we can see that most of the front chassis, including the keyboard and mouse trackpad, stays very cool. That is very cool and shows that Razer's vapor chamber cooling effectively manages heat from emerging externally from the chassis in areas that it's not supposed to. Our thermal imaging camera measured a maximum temperate of 34.8°C on the thin panel between the keyboard and the 14" display, which is technically below a healthy human's body temperature.

Much of the heat from our thermal imaging camera on the rear panel came from near the 68.1 Wh battery. Even the exhaust vents weren't warm, despite pumping out warm air after an hour of F1 2022 gameplay. We observed a maximum temperature of 37.2­°C on the rear panel, which, much like we saw from the front panel, shows the Razer Blade 14's vapor chamber cooling solution is effectively circulating the heat in a way that doesn't impact the rest of the system or chassis.

Thermal Performance: 1hr CPU Average, F1 2022

Focusing on CPU temperatures when gaming, we can see that the vapor chamber cooling within the Razer Blade 14 is doing well. With an average CPU core temperature of 80.2°C after an hour on the Ryzen 9 7940HS, thermal performance is on point, which is impressive given the Blade 14's svelte and thin profile.

Thermal Performance: 1hr GPU Average, F1 2022

Moving onto the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, we can see the vapor chamber keeping the graphics cool, too, with a 1hr average temperature of 75.4°C. As we've mentioned, Razer's patented vapor chamber cooling within the 17.99 mm deep frame is a credit to the Blade 14.

Razer Blade 14 (2023): Graphics Performance Razer Blade 14 (2023): Conclusion
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • olde94 - Wednesday, June 21, 2023 - link

    i'd also add. All those graphs with one bar is just laughable. It would make more sense to combine all in to one graph and have the name of the bar, be what the name of the graph is now, given that it doesn't compare to anything,,,,

    Anandtech has certainly fallen a lot since back in the old days before about 2015.
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, June 21, 2023 - link

    Unfortunately, if we want to test the Phoenix APU any time in the near future, the Blade 14 was a take it or leave it proposition. While I expect it will eventually come to the desktop in some fashion, for now it's a laptop only part. Which means the only way we can review it right now is as part of the laptop.

    To state the obvious, we don't regularly do laptop reviews these days (budget cuts). So we don't have a large collection of comparison systems to run it against. The best we could do (and what we were really interested in anyhow) is how it compares to AMD's Raphael CPU, so that is what we opted to focus our limited testing time on.

    Given infinite time and resources, of course I'd prefer to do much more. But with only a few days to test, we did what we could while still meeting the embargo. The alternative would be not reviewing Phoenix at all, and that's simply not a viable option, especially given how important it is to AMD's product stack over the next few years.
  • cohed - Tuesday, June 20, 2023 - link

    Dave2D made a comparison video between the Razer Blade 14 and Asus Rog Zephyrus G14. The Asus with RTX 4060, similarly specced to the Razer, costs $1600 which is 800$ less than Razer. Just ridiculously overpriced.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEEc65x4SMs
  • WestPole - Tuesday, June 20, 2023 - link

    Similarly spec’ed is the operative phrase. Vendor A similarly spec’ed to vendor B generally has far less variance in performance than often found in pricing.
  • Duwelon - Tuesday, June 20, 2023 - link

    Razer makes the cleanest looking PC laptops by far, but ya the prices are bonkers. They could gain a much bigger chunk of the marketshare if they would ditch excessive RGB bs and at least try to compete with Asus/Lenovo on price. Also I'd like to see mid range laptop CPUs like 7845HX paired with a 4090, it would perform just as well as a high end Intel/AMD laptop CPU and have much better battery life.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, June 22, 2023 - link

    The CPU accounts for a relatively small amount of power budget when compared to a 4090 so I don't believe battery life improvements would be "much better" as you have implied.
  • lemurbutton - Wednesday, June 21, 2023 - link

    That's because Razer is trying to be like Apple, but without Apple Silicon. Razer uses a metal enclosure, it's thinner like Macs which requires more expensive parts and more engineering. Whenever PC makers try to make something like the Macbook, it results in prices at or more expensive than Macs because they can't mass manufacture like Apple can.
  • anshu87 - Tuesday, June 20, 2023 - link

    Battery life in tests by Tom's and Hothardware ranged from 7.5-8.5 hours.
  • StevoLincolnite - Wednesday, June 21, 2023 - link

    Comparing notebook against desktops is fine.

    But to omit any like-for-like testing? Wow;.
  • GreenReaper - Wednesday, June 21, 2023 - link

    I imagine they didn't have any systems like it to test it against, not being known as a laptop reviewer and not having the budget to just buy them (which is pretty sad, come on Future Plc).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now